OK, I can understand that if you don't PvP and don't go to Cyrodiil, you may not be familiar with the ridiculous load times that often happen and the frequent crashes. I can understand if you don't group while questing that you would not be familiar with all the bugs surrounding that. Maybe you don't go to group dungeons often and see that many times you can't complete the dungeon because they are bugged. Maybe you have never gone to a public dungeon so you have never seen the big mound of people all piled up on the boss's spawn point so that it dies almost the instant it spawns....and on and on.
I can understand not seeing some of those thing, but i would find it hard to believe that you have not seen any of them. More importantly, i would have to cry foul if you were to claim that you have not seen quest objectives, on a regular basis, that were missing, or not intractable because they are out of phase. That is something that everyone has to deal with multiple times a night, and logging out of the game and back in to try and fix has been accepted as part of the regular routine.
Individually, they are forgivable this soon after launch, but the shear volume and regularity of them are beginning to wear people down.
Just because you don't encounter bugs doesn't mean they don't exist. I haven't encountered any either but I certainly do believe all the reports I've seen. Video proof of it seems pretty irrefutable IMO.
OK, I can understand that if you don't PvP and don't go to Cyrodiil, you may not be familiar with the ridiculous load times that often happen and the frequent crashes. I can understand if you don't group while questing that you would not be familiar with all the bugs surrounding that. Maybe you don't go to group dungeons often and see that many times you can't complete the dungeon because they are bugged. Maybe you have never gone to a public dungeon so you have never seen the big mound of people all piled up on the boss's spawn point so that it dies almost the instant it spawns....and on and on.
I can understand not seeing some of those thing, but i would find it hard to believe that you have not seen any of them. More importantly, i would have to cry foul if you were to claim that you have not seen quest objectives, on a regular basis, that were missing, or not intractable because they are out of phase. That is something that everyone has to deal with multiple times a night, and logging out of the game and back in to try and fix has been accepted as part of the regular routine.
Individually, they are forgivable this soon after launch, but the shear volume and regularity of them are beginning to wear people down.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »If you don't agree with at least the bug parts of what he said. You are a blind fanboy. Enough said.
He exaggerated the bugs.
No, he didn't. He overly focused on the negative aspects, but the bugs he mentioned (and showed) are very real and very prevalent.
I have never fallen through the world. Not once. Yet after watching the video you would think it was a regular part of the gameplay.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »If you don't agree with at least the bug parts of what he said. You are a blind fanboy. Enough said.
He exaggerated the bugs.
No, he didn't. He overly focused on the negative aspects, but the bugs he mentioned (and showed) are very real and very prevalent.
I have never fallen through the world. Not once. Yet after watching the video you would think it was a regular part of the gameplay.
When I was watching it I was laughing because all of those things-including falling though the world, have happened to me.
ChairGraveyard wrote: »WhinyJoe is a total loser and couldn't provide a real "review" to save his life.
Instead he just baits idiots into giving him views so he can get ad revenue. People here are so damned gullible.
"jimredtalon wrote: »I have never had gay sex but I hear its a common thing in society and I can accept that.
I was so excited for this game, i forked out $2100 for a new computer in preparation for ESO. Bought the Imperial Edition for $120 AUD and invested hours apon hours into theory-crafting, only to find a boring, tedious, dysfunctional game.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »I like Angry Joe a lot, but most of the footage he used was from early access or beta because the vast majority of the bugs he showed are fixed.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The bots and gold sellers are a huge issue, but every MMO with an economy has those issues.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The rest of his video is filled with a ton of misinformation and attempts to put down the game like the mention of gold drops and "boss" drops. The actual "bosses" he showed were just people at the end of major quest lines... not really a boss like open world bosses or the bosses in dungeons that actually do have a chance at dropping good loot. Misinformation about economy and how players generate money. Misinformation about Imperial Edition and items that came with it.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Phasing can be an issue, but the phasing is meant to create immersion for the SOLO PLAYER... not for the group player. There is group content in the game with the public dungeons (more so at VR levels), dark anchors, instanced dungeons and the Adventure Zone content that is coming. He complains about immersion but conveniently skips how the solo experience of the game through phasing is actually very immersive.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He craps on WildStar (in other videos) for being the same old WoW formula questing... then craps on ESO for attempting something different. That is why developers don't like to take chances to change the genre... because people like him can't make up their mind on what they want. If ESO fails because of phasing it would be another nail in the coffin for championing innovation.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Honestly, the review was made to bandwagon on the ESO hate train to generate views and money.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He praised Guild Wars 2 for having a lot of the very same things that ESO has and in many ways Guild Wars 2 was a much shallower game which is why they can't charge monthly for subs because people wouldn't do it.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »I like Angry Joe a lot, but most of the footage he used was from early access or beta because the vast majority of the bugs he showed are fixed.
What bugs did he show are fixed? I still crash with most of a group every day in pvp.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The bots and gold sellers are a huge issue, but every MMO with an economy has those issues.
Maybe so, but this is the first mmo I have played where they really intrude on gameplay and immersion because of the way public dungeons are set up.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The rest of his video is filled with a ton of misinformation and attempts to put down the game like the mention of gold drops and "boss" drops. The actual "bosses" he showed were just people at the end of major quest lines... not really a boss like open world bosses or the bosses in dungeons that actually do have a chance at dropping good loot. Misinformation about economy and how players generate money. Misinformation about Imperial Edition and items that came with it.
And you think AJ exaggerates?! The drops are pitiful, even from bosses and there is a paywall to content even though the game has a sub- even if he didn't get the details 100% correct, his observations are accurate.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Phasing can be an issue, but the phasing is meant to create immersion for the SOLO PLAYER... not for the group player. There is group content in the game with the public dungeons (more so at VR levels), dark anchors, instanced dungeons and the Adventure Zone content that is coming. He complains about immersion but conveniently skips how the solo experience of the game through phasing is actually very immersive.
Yes eso has the two edged sword of phasing that on the one hand gives a sense of meaning to in game choices, but on the other takes away the ability to quest easily with friends. And the immersion you get from it is destroyed by the 1000 other joes questing in the same "phase".
All the other group content you mention have serious issues- public dungeons are basically the bot farmer paradise, dungeons are troll paradise.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He craps on WildStar (in other videos) for being the same old WoW formula questing... then craps on ESO for attempting something different. That is why developers don't like to take chances to change the genre... because people like him can't make up their mind on what they want. If ESO fails because of phasing it would be another nail in the coffin for championing innovation.
Yes he craps on games or elements in games he doesn't like, he gives enormous praise to games he does like. When a game does something new which is actually good (in his opinion) he says so.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Honestly, the review was made to bandwagon on the ESO hate train to generate views and money.
He gave a well justified negative review. He is clearly upset and disappointed because he was really looking forward to this game.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He praised Guild Wars 2 for having a lot of the very same things that ESO has and in many ways Guild Wars 2 was a much shallower game which is why they can't charge monthly for subs because people wouldn't do it.
GW2 has more than eso, even at launch it was a fuller, more complete, less buggy game. Ur sub has nothing to do with what a game offers. Darkfall is sub-based and that has a fraction of the content and polish of many f2p games. A plethora of sub-based games have gone f2p and many of them have lot more content than eso.
A sub does not = good game, and more often than not history shows that it = fail.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »I like Angry Joe a lot, but most of the footage he used was from early access or beta because the vast majority of the bugs he showed are fixed.
What bugs did he show are fixed? I still crash with most of a group every day in pvp.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The bots and gold sellers are a huge issue, but every MMO with an economy has those issues.
Maybe so, but this is the first mmo I have played where they really intrude on gameplay and immersion because of the way public dungeons are set up.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The rest of his video is filled with a ton of misinformation and attempts to put down the game like the mention of gold drops and "boss" drops. The actual "bosses" he showed were just people at the end of major quest lines... not really a boss like open world bosses or the bosses in dungeons that actually do have a chance at dropping good loot. Misinformation about economy and how players generate money. Misinformation about Imperial Edition and items that came with it.
And you think AJ exaggerates?! The drops are pitiful, even from bosses and there is a paywall to content even though the game has a sub- even if he didn't get the details 100% correct, his observations are accurate.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Phasing can be an issue, but the phasing is meant to create immersion for the SOLO PLAYER... not for the group player. There is group content in the game with the public dungeons (more so at VR levels), dark anchors, instanced dungeons and the Adventure Zone content that is coming. He complains about immersion but conveniently skips how the solo experience of the game through phasing is actually very immersive.
Yes eso has the two edged sword of phasing that on the one hand gives a sense of meaning to in game choices, but on the other takes away the ability to quest easily with friends. And the immersion you get from it is destroyed by the 1000 other joes questing in the same "phase".
All the other group content you mention have serious issues- public dungeons are basically the bot farmer paradise, dungeons are troll paradise.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He craps on WildStar (in other videos) for being the same old WoW formula questing... then craps on ESO for attempting something different. That is why developers don't like to take chances to change the genre... because people like him can't make up their mind on what they want. If ESO fails because of phasing it would be another nail in the coffin for championing innovation.
Yes he craps on games or elements in games he doesn't like, he gives enormous praise to games he does like. When a game does something new which is actually good (in his opinion) he says so.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Honestly, the review was made to bandwagon on the ESO hate train to generate views and money.
He gave a well justified negative review. He is clearly upset and disappointed because he was really looking forward to this game.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He praised Guild Wars 2 for having a lot of the very same things that ESO has and in many ways Guild Wars 2 was a much shallower game which is why they can't charge monthly for subs because people wouldn't do it.
GW2 has more than eso, even at launch it was a fuller, more complete, less buggy game. Ur sub has nothing to do with what a game offers. Darkfall is sub-based and that has a fraction of the content and polish of many f2p games. A plethora of sub-based games have gone f2p and many of them have lot more content than eso.
A sub does not = good game, and more often than not history shows that it = fail.So how are you liking the game so far?
But it does affirm the people who have fixated on hating the game, so I'm sure it'll be relentlessly promoted - while positive reviews will be ignored or downplayed as not being honest.
Think of Angry Joe as Fox News. He has an agenda (fame or fortune), and that is to make money for himself. Think for yourself, stop letting other people think for you. If you don't have the money to risk trying a new game, whether it passes your fails your test, then you need to make other things a priority instead of gaming.
darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »I like Angry Joe a lot, but most of the footage he used was from early access or beta because the vast majority of the bugs he showed are fixed.
What bugs did he show are fixed? I still crash with most of a group every day in pvp.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The bots and gold sellers are a huge issue, but every MMO with an economy has those issues.
Maybe so, but this is the first mmo I have played where they really intrude on gameplay and immersion because of the way public dungeons are set up.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »The rest of his video is filled with a ton of misinformation and attempts to put down the game like the mention of gold drops and "boss" drops. The actual "bosses" he showed were just people at the end of major quest lines... not really a boss like open world bosses or the bosses in dungeons that actually do have a chance at dropping good loot. Misinformation about economy and how players generate money. Misinformation about Imperial Edition and items that came with it.
And you think AJ exaggerates?! The drops are pitiful, even from bosses and there is a paywall to content even though the game has a sub- even if he didn't get the details 100% correct, his observations are accurate.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Phasing can be an issue, but the phasing is meant to create immersion for the SOLO PLAYER... not for the group player. There is group content in the game with the public dungeons (more so at VR levels), dark anchors, instanced dungeons and the Adventure Zone content that is coming. He complains about immersion but conveniently skips how the solo experience of the game through phasing is actually very immersive.
Yes eso has the two edged sword of phasing that on the one hand gives a sense of meaning to in game choices, but on the other takes away the ability to quest easily with friends. And the immersion you get from it is destroyed by the 1000 other joes questing in the same "phase".
All the other group content you mention have serious issues- public dungeons are basically the bot farmer paradise, dungeons are troll paradise.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He craps on WildStar (in other videos) for being the same old WoW formula questing... then craps on ESO for attempting something different. That is why developers don't like to take chances to change the genre... because people like him can't make up their mind on what they want. If ESO fails because of phasing it would be another nail in the coffin for championing innovation.
Yes he craps on games or elements in games he doesn't like, he gives enormous praise to games he does like. When a game does something new which is actually good (in his opinion) he says so.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »Honestly, the review was made to bandwagon on the ESO hate train to generate views and money.
He gave a well justified negative review. He is clearly upset and disappointed because he was really looking forward to this game.darkdruidssb14_ESO wrote: »He praised Guild Wars 2 for having a lot of the very same things that ESO has and in many ways Guild Wars 2 was a much shallower game which is why they can't charge monthly for subs because people wouldn't do it.
GW2 has more than eso, even at launch it was a fuller, more complete, less buggy game. Ur sub has nothing to do with what a game offers. Darkfall is sub-based and that has a fraction of the content and polish of many f2p games. A plethora of sub-based games have gone f2p and many of them have lot more content than eso.
A sub does not = good game, and more often than not history shows that it = fail.So how are you liking the game so far?
I already posted many times my opinion of the game, but to sum up I think ESO is walking a tightrope between brilliantly meshing single player rpg and mmo gameplay, and failing to be good at either.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »Most people know he is right, you can't argue with video proof, but at the same time. I had people try to argue that this is not op as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxBlMayv12M#t=683
so ya, this game is broke.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »You can't base the game off looks. He thought it look like crap, and he is right. To him it does look like crap. There is no point in argue what peoples taste are.
This game is broken with balance, and having to relog each time people die, or zone.
This is a FACT, you can't argue with a fact. The bugs in this game are too much to ignore.