Luke_Flamesword wrote: »Problem is tank meta in PvP and dk as best tank class always will be better in that meta. You can of course nerf to the ground their damage but than it will AGAIN useless in PvE. I play dk as dd mostly in PvE and I don't want another serious nerf, because PvP is inbalanced.
Dk is a tank who can also do incredible damage in pvp. Few days ago i was hitten by DK's crit wisp 11K!, even through my 2100 impen...
My blastbone NEVER HIT SO HARD AS DK CAN!
sneakymitchell wrote: »Don’t worry soon class identity will be a myth.
On the other hand why Dragonknight is very good in trials is basically recently released content has a main with a mini boss or multiple bosses, and some small adds all together. Dragonknight has strong dots which can be applied to multiple targets all at once. So class shines where area damage is important which is majority of the content basically.
Also majority of the damage is flame damage and there is a monster set that buffs flame damage by five percent with a relatively high uptime. Their own kit also has a skill that buffs flame damage by six percent.
maybe it doesn't need nerfs, it's just everything else that needs buffs
Van_Winkle wrote: »Lol. If DK is so OP, why there is so much wardens in pvp? Nobody cares, that wardens have everything that DK haves and much more? Just another "nerf everything that i can't kill!!!1" thread.
Van_Winkle wrote: »Lol. If DK is so OP, why there is so much wardens in pvp? Nobody cares, that wardens have everything that DK haves and much more? Just another "nerf everything that i can't kill!!!1" thread.
emilyhyoyeon wrote: »On the other hand why Dragonknight is very good in trials is basically recently released content has a main with a mini boss or multiple bosses, and some small adds all together. Dragonknight has strong dots which can be applied to multiple targets all at once. So class shines where area damage is important which is majority of the content basically.
Also majority of the damage is flame damage and there is a monster set that buffs flame damage by five percent with a relatively high uptime. Their own kit also has a skill that buffs flame damage by six percent.
They have been this way the past year+. It wasn't this overwhelmingly DK before that.
Van_Winkle wrote: »Lol. If DK is so OP, why there is so much wardens in pvp? Nobody cares, that wardens have everything that DK haves and much more? Just another "nerf everything that i can't kill!!!1" thread.
How to say you have no idea about class balance without saying it.
emilyhyoyeon wrote: »On the other hand why Dragonknight is very good in trials is basically recently released content has a main with a mini boss or multiple bosses, and some small adds all together. Dragonknight has strong dots which can be applied to multiple targets all at once. So class shines where area damage is important which is majority of the content basically.
Also majority of the damage is flame damage and there is a monster set that buffs flame damage by five percent with a relatively high uptime. Their own kit also has a skill that buffs flame damage by six percent.
They have been this way the past year+. It wasn't this overwhelmingly DK before that.
Sorry, how do you see that DKs are the top DDs there, is it the color of the name? (Genuine question, not bashing / baiting)
xylena_lazarow wrote: »They effectively deleted the Elder Dragon passive from PvP. DK no longer has a melee reach advantage and gained nothing in return for losing that advantage. It's much more significant than it first looks, especially when it comes to the faster paced competitive action. Meanwhile, NBs spamming 7m range Veiled Strike on you is gonna be FUN...
Lucifer9th wrote: »For PVP aspect, magma armor and morphs needs to not reduce player damage
Dk don't need a god mode in pvp to perform
Van_Winkle wrote: »Van_Winkle wrote: »Lol. If DK is so OP, why there is so much wardens in pvp? Nobody cares, that wardens have everything that DK haves and much more? Just another "nerf everything that i can't kill!!!1" thread.
How to say you have no idea about class balance without saying it.
Really? I have no idea about class balance?) And what are you know about this?) "Nerf DK cause they kill me!!!" - is this how you know situation?)
Id also like to spit in here that blockcasting heals with snb or froststaff is way too strong too, all classes can do it ofc, but classes with burstheals such as DK does it with such ease.
ketsparrowhawk wrote: »Right but the Templar keeps your healthbar full. Even offensively spec'd plars are essentially healers on the back bar. DK support mostly takes the form of offense. If they don't have that then their usefulness in a team comp is minimal. Currently the only reason to bring a DK vs a Warden in group BG's is the DK has better killing power. Take that away then there is very little reason not to just replace them with a Warden.
Fair point re Mist Form. Everyone competes with Sorcs now.
Not "literal" oblivion damage.
Id also like to spit in here that blockcasting heals with snb or froststaff is way too strong too, all classes can do it ofc, but classes with burstheals such as DK does it with such ease.
Doesnt every class in the game have access to a stong burst heal ? The cause of the tank meta arnt dks or any other class, and its not blockcasted healing either. The Problem lies within the hybridisation, some years ago most of the stamina specs were limited to either vigor or rally for their heals, while magica specs mostly relied on their classheals or had to slot a restro in order to heal (which prevented them from stacking to much defense on their backbar and made it easyer for zos to balance the diffrent specs). These days 99% of the magica specs in pvp have one morph of vigor equiped, all stamina specs use their class specific burst heal even though it costs magica (BoL/Dragonblood/ResistenFlesh/Sacrifice etc.)
The hybrid scaling just enabeled too much healing for all classes.
DirtyDeeds765 wrote: »What you really meant to say was, "No buffs for classes other than DK?".
The answer isn't making the DK weak like other classes. Its making other classes strong like the DK.
@DirtyDeeds765
ketsparrowhawk wrote: »DirtyDeeds765 wrote: »What you really meant to say was, "No buffs for classes other than DK?".
The answer isn't making the DK weak like other classes. Its making other classes strong like the DK.
@DirtyDeeds765
This mindset always makes me laugh.
One class is overpowered so we need to rebalance the ENTIRE GAME rather than just address the one problem class. Glad you're not my boss.