guild history all missing in guild roster

Salix_alba

ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »

Tezzaa wrote: »

ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »

Hi everyone, just to update, we're still working on getting this fixed. As such, it will not be included in Monday's PC incremental patch.

Do we have any kind of ETA when this can be fixed so those os us who run guilds can make short or long term plans to accommodate this breakage?

We just finished testing a fix for this, and are planning to include it in the next incremental patch for both PC and console.

ty can't wait

SammiSakura

The next incremental for PC I believe isn't this Monday, it's the one after...
@ZOS_GinaBruno can you just clarify which patch this will attempt to be fixed in?

RdyP1ayr1

Thank you for announcing that this would be fixed in the April 5th patch for pc and console during the twitch stream!!

Magdalina

RdyP1ayr1 wrote: »

Thank you for announcing that this would be fixed in the April 5th patch for pc and console during the twitch stream!!

So they did, eh? Damn, it's just too bad that they don't have any official place where they could announce this rather than on Twitch streams. Idk, maybe they should make a forum or something for that sort of stuff? What do you think?

Knipskastenmann

Too bad the stream didn't work for me (bad connection, not @ home). Did they say any date for the console patches?

Ramber

What twitch stream? lol sheesh. ZoS has an information problem, no one i know knew about it.

CynderzLite

God forbid they actually communicate in a easy way for their paying customers to be informed on matters involving this game while actually playing this game instead of having to be involved in so many other formats to get any information on what’s actually happening with this game! I am extremely disappointed and frustrated once again in the way this company chooses to handle things but not surprised anymore!

ruifeio

BTW

many posts pointing that PTS forum did talk about this bug

Can anybody take me to that threath ?

[snip]

[Edited to remove Non-Constructive Content]

virtus753

ruifeio wrote: »

BTW

many posts pointing that PTS forum did talk about this bug

Can anybody take me to that threath ?

[snip]

Can you point out where “many posts” said a thread had been started on the forums? I see several saying it was “known” on the PTS and that feedback was submitted.

The devs have said repeatedly that they much prefer /bug reports sent from within the PTS itself to forum threads. I know I’ve done that for many bugs that I haven’t mentioned here. Just because you can’t find a thread doesn’t mean it wasn’t known or reported in the way the devs prefer.

Ramber

So you agree it was not announced to everyone in any meaningful way. Your idea of a mass notification from a programmers note is less then convincing. Its also not official.

virtus753

Ramber wrote: »

So you agree it was not announced to everyone in any meaningful way. Your idea of a mass notification from a programmers note is less then convincing. Its also not official.

Who are you responding to here? I don’t see anyone saying anything about a mass notification from a programmer’s note... Was a post deleted?

QenQuni

Maintenance for the week of March 29:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – March 29
• Xbox One: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – March 30, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®4: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – March 30, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)

With a 6 hour downtime, we can kind of already tell that at least a part of the fixes will be implemented on consoles tomorrow

CynderzLite

QenQuni wrote: »

Maintenance for the week of March 29:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – March 29
• Xbox One: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – March 30, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®4: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – March 30, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)

With a 6 hour downtime, we can kind of already tell that at least a part of the fixes will be implemented on consoles tomorrow

That sure would be nice

rotten333

That sure would be nice

But, wasn't. I see the effort was put in to make it alphabetical on the listings instead of time offline. This looks ok up front, but from a managers point of view is about as useless as *** on a bull. Probably look here for the bug.

Ramber

I Cannot wait for this fix to hit live it will be about time, so many people are waiting to join guilds!!!

MKintr

Too late already. All new member applications have already expired. As expected.

SteveCampsOut

It's FIXED!

April Fools!

karliahquinn

But it's the 2nd...

MKintr

Even April Fools' jokes are too late with ESO

Kwoung

I sincerely hope this will be fixed when I login tomorrow.

karliahquinn

So now everyone is 624 months offline

Great fix

kasser0le

karliahquinn wrote: »

So now everyone is 624 months offline

Great fix

as one of my officers put it
'great, now we all get kicked'

ListerJMC

Came here to check what the situation was, because it doesn't look like the patch worked.

Unfortunately, having everyone show as being 600+ months offline is not much better than it was before. I can't reliably make space for new people

fierackas

karliahquinn wrote: »

So now everyone is 624 months offline

Great fix

yup

ruifeio

ListerJMC wrote: »

Came here to check what the situation was, because it doesn't look like the patch worked.

Unfortunately, having everyone show as being 600+ months offline is not much better than it was before. I can't reliably make space for new people

What? ROTFL

Doc45

New inactivity policy for social guilds: 50 years

ruifeio

Doc45 wrote: »

New inactivity policy for social guilds: 50 years

"Information about offline players from the Friends/Guild lists are now correctly shown for players that have been offline for a while"

quoted from patch notes

guild history was gone bye bye

Edenprime

Is this going to be fixed? I know I have 54 inactives in my guild, so the server has that information, but we don't

Pyvos

My guess is they allegedly sorted it roughly two days ago but either the timestamps are FUBAR or they're failing to get them, so it's reverting to the default UNIX epoch timestamp (Unix epoch is 00:00:00 UTC on 1 January 1970), which is about 624mo ago.

karliahquinn

I apparently haven't been online since 1969