Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
It does not sound like a very smart idea to tell the player base they could be banned for reporting questionable behavior. Does not make much sense as it does not harm anyone.
Goregrinder wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
It does not sound like a very smart idea to tell the player base they could be banned for reporting questionable behavior. Does not make much sense as it does not harm anyone.
They would only be banned if they falsely accuse someone. If they accurately accuse someone with tons of physical evidence, then there is no problem with that.
Cancel culture needs to stop, false accusations need to be minimized and be punished.
Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
Goregrinder wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
It does not sound like a very smart idea to tell the player base they could be banned for reporting questionable behavior. Does not make much sense as it does not harm anyone.
They would only be banned if they falsely accuse someone. If they accurately accuse someone with tons of physical evidence, then there is no problem with that.
Cancel culture needs to stop, false accusations need to be minimized and be punished.
VaranisArano wrote: »SammiSakura wrote: »ZOS_JessicaFolsom ZOS_GinaBruno this is still happening! They keep applying to guilds, then adding a second account in, the proceeding to list and buy mundane stuff at ridiculous prices. We are kicking and blocking as fast as we can, but theyre just making new accounts. Please can something be done about this? we are keeping screenshots and logs of names as much as we can
In the meantime, have you considered temporarily restricting your guild invite privileges so they cannot add the second account? That sucks for the guild members who are using it responsibly, but it might help.
That is quite problematic now, when guild finder exists. Technically even if all trade guilds would agree and limit their recruiting even further during the time when recruiting is already slow, that would make it harder for launderers to join actual trading guild, but that won't stop them joining in random social/PvP/PvE/RP guilds, which got 50+ members and just enough people to get store open and continue internally trading.
As long as ZOS do nothing, we can't do much about the problem. These cases which were reported by GMs are only a top of iceberg and unfortunately there isn't much what guilds can do about it.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but simple line of "we are investigating the issue" would be something nice to hear from their side.
The question remains, why is it the job of any Player, let alone Guildleader to try to stop these things from happening? It's already more than enough that it's coming to light because of those determined few. Why do they have to be jury, judge and executioner?
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »where are they getting all the gold that they need to launder? 100's of millions?
@karthrag_inak
It's just not that much gold if that is your focus, especially if bots are in play (not saying they are). I was never an active trader, but easily accumulated mid 8 figures in this game, and I spend/hoard like crazy. I knew multiple people (who I am fairly certain never used a bot) that were well into 9 figures, but of course, that was their focus.
But if they are getting the 8 or 9 figure sums by legitimate in-game means, then there is no need to launder said gold ...
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »where are they getting all the gold that they need to launder? 100's of millions?
@karthrag_inak
It's just not that much gold if that is your focus, especially if bots are in play (not saying they are). I was never an active trader, but easily accumulated mid 8 figures in this game, and I spend/hoard like crazy. I knew multiple people (who I am fairly certain never used a bot) that were well into 9 figures, but of course, that was their focus.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Does that mean it was an exploitable issue somewhere in the system?...have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »But i have to ask.Does that mean it was an exploitable issue somewhere in the system?...have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
It would seem there was exploit or else there would not be a need to roll out a fix.
It does bring to light that it is better and appropriate to report an exploit when one discovers it instead of utilizing it for personal gain. One is beneficial to the game and the other is deserving of Zos taking action.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Good to hear that Zos does look into these matters. It shows that players reporting suspicious behavior is appropriate.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »But i have to ask.Does that mean it was an exploitable issue somewhere in the system?...have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
It would seem there was exploit or else there would not be a need to roll out a fix.
It does bring to light that it is better and appropriate to report an exploit when one discovers it instead of utilizing it for personal gain. One is beneficial to the game and the other is deserving of Zos taking action.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »I honestly don't see how anything actually gets laundered.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks to everyone for bringing this to our attention. We wanted to let you know we’re taking care of the offending accounts, and have already rolled out a fix to prevent this from continuing to happen.THANK YOU!
That’s really great to hear. How about the guilds that was used to launder this gold. Should they treat the gold like when the multi bidding bugged? Hate to see some good people get in trouble for other malicious activities
Goregrinder wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
It does not sound like a very smart idea to tell the player base they could be banned for reporting questionable behavior. Does not make much sense as it does not harm anyone.
They would only be banned if they falsely accuse someone. If they accurately accuse someone with tons of physical evidence, then there is no problem with that.
Cancel culture needs to stop, false accusations need to be minimized and be punished.
karthrag_inak wrote: »Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »where are they getting all the gold that they need to launder? 100's of millions?
@karthrag_inak
It's just not that much gold if that is your focus, especially if bots are in play (not saying they are). I was never an active trader, but easily accumulated mid 8 figures in this game, and I spend/hoard like crazy. I knew multiple people (who I am fairly certain never used a bot) that were well into 9 figures, but of course, that was their focus.
but to maintain this (if they are selling gold) they have to get figures that high routinely. I have low 8 figures in gold, and it is far from my main pursuit and i could see an easy way to triple that amount if i made a serious go at it, with 18 master crafters, i have mats out the wazoo. but to get 100s of millions routinely, repeatedly, just seems hard to fathom, outside of it being some kind of gold exploit.
karthrag_inak wrote: »Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »karthrag_inak wrote: »where are they getting all the gold that they need to launder? 100's of millions?
@karthrag_inak
It's just not that much gold if that is your focus, especially if bots are in play (not saying they are). I was never an active trader, but easily accumulated mid 8 figures in this game, and I spend/hoard like crazy. I knew multiple people (who I am fairly certain never used a bot) that were well into 9 figures, but of course, that was their focus.
but to maintain this (if they are selling gold) they have to get figures that high routinely. I have low 8 figures in gold, and it is far from my main pursuit and i could see an easy way to triple that amount if i made a serious go at it, with 18 master crafters, i have mats out the wazoo. but to get 100s of millions routinely, repeatedly, just seems hard to fathom, outside of it being some kind of gold exploit.
like i said before, to earn 1 billion gold legitimately, here is the math.
ESO has been out for 5 years. 365 days x 5 (years) is 1,825 days. 1,000,000,000/1825 = 547,945.
someone would have to pull in at least 547,945 gold PER DAY, every day for 5 years. so unless these people are pulling in MULTPLE millions of gold PER DAY (24 hours) all year round, there is no way to legitimately make this much gold just like that. Math does not lie, but people certainly do. And this that we're seeing is almost certainly 99.9% fraudulent gold laundering. Stop defending it or trying to rationalize it and call a spade a spade.
Goregrinder wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »Emma_Overload wrote: »And, i have yet to see anything legitimate sell for more than 2 or 3 million. And those are a few certain rare items. It would not take much to stop these stupid high sales. Or ban people based on these sales until they make their case they are a legitimate player.
LOL do you hear yourself? In civilized societies, the burden of proof is on the accusers. Why should some random player have to prove their innocence? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I've seen in this thread, and I'm right to condemn it. Now the mob is coming after me:
It is appropriate for a player to bring these concerned to Zos. It is up to Zos to look into it and see if they can find any wrong doing that is actionable. Petty bickering about it in the forums is meaningless as it serves no purpose. Well, none except to keep this thread active.
I feel like if ZOS investigates, finds no wrong doing, than the accuser should be punished for false accusations. A 1-year ban should be good for first time offenders.
It does not sound like a very smart idea to tell the player base they could be banned for reporting questionable behavior. Does not make much sense as it does not harm anyone.
They would only be banned if they falsely accuse someone. If they accurately accuse someone with tons of physical evidence, then there is no problem with that.
Cancel culture needs to stop, false accusations need to be minimized and be punished.
@UrigallOreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »I honestly don't see how anything actually gets laundered.
Oreyn, A better term might be "conversion" Might not be case this time but much of the organised, gold farming is geared towards accumulating in-game gold then converting it into r/l money.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »Yeah, laundering is simply not an appropriate term. It's not like there is a tax collector in ESO. I guess what I still struggle with is why would you need to do such a thing as a gold seller? I dont want to get a ban for talking about gold selling, but I don't really see how this would be helpful to a hypothetical gold seller. You would think you would want as little record of the transaction as possible. I would guess that in most instances, you buy gold from some shady website, get an ingame message, meet under some dirty bridge in deshaan and do a trade. The only possible record of that would be screen shots from the buyer or seller or whatever ZOS has server side. Seems like "laundering" money via a guild trader is just a good way to get caught IMO, because all your guild mates have access to the transactions, which certainly raise some eyebrows.
Waffennacht wrote: »I see no evidence of ToS being broken with what I see.
I see things that would imply that the ToS may have been broken in the past; aka circumstancal evidence.
So unless you have evidence of the act in which the ToS being broken with; I do not see how ZoS could take action
Waffennacht wrote: »I see no evidence of ToS being broken with what I see.
I see things that would imply that the ToS may have been broken in the past; aka circumstancal evidence.
So unless you have evidence of the act in which the ToS being broken with; I do not see how ZoS could take action
Good point. Only ZoS can investigate and make a judgement towards it.