PC players have this game on easymode for the most part of character growth, they let addons do the work for things like mage guild books, skyshards, combat timers/announcements, etc...watch tv and "do the work" as they say.
Imagine the outrage if ZOS blocked all addons.
Zone guide should have location for all skyshards & lorebooks that way console players can cheat the system also😉
Just to be clear, not all PC players use such addons. Some, myself included, use no addons at all while others simply avoid those which hand everything to them on a plate.
PC players have this game on easymode for the most part of character growth, they let addons do the work for things like mage guild books, skyshards, combat timers/announcements, etc...watch tv and "do the work" as they say.
Imagine the outrage if ZOS blocked all addons.
Zone guide should have location for all skyshards & lorebooks that way console players can cheat the system also😉
Just to be clear, not all PC players use such addons. Some, myself included, use no addons at all while others simply avoid those which hand everything to them on a plate.
You're the minority, & a very small one at that.
PC players have this game on easymode for the most part of character growth, they let addons do the work for things like mage guild books, skyshards, combat timers/announcements, etc...watch tv and "do the work" as they say.
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »The defense force for this saying "it's optional!" is disgusting. It's not even account-wide for Christ's sake.
The defense force for this saying it's a rip-off is disgusting. It's not even mandatory...
And pls, leave out Christ. We all pray to Alkosh.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Massive_Stain wrote: »There's literally no reason to buy all skyshards unless you are really that lazy and have lots of money to spend. I'm disappointed cyrodil shards aren't there tbh. Those would be the ones I'm really interested in
If there wasnt a reason to buy the damn things, it wouldnt be in the store would it? You would think that if a company didnt think they could make a buck off of something they wouldnt bother spending resources creating a means to unlock such a thing on a character.
There has been a large demand for this by the playerbase due to those players not having the time or energy to constantly chase down skyshards on every character they want to make. But the amount of money ZOS wants for said players to pay out to unlock all of the skyshards is the inexcusable part of this.
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »It's entirely defensible:
- It's optional.
- It requires that you've already collected the skyshards on another character.
- it's optional.
- it's granular to the zone level; you won't find many people buying the full set.
- it's optional.
- Given point #2, it doesn't prey on new players: you've done it once, so you know what you're getting into.
- It's optional.
Don't like it, don't buy it. I won't, but I'm certainly not troubled by a pay-to-catch-up mechanic. There are drastically bigger issues in ESO I can spend my time worrying about.
This "don't like it don't buy it" mentality is precisely why we're in the situation we're in now. This is some cancerous Nexon-tier monetization.
You forget that those don't have shelf-life. It costs near zero to add some lines of code into the shop. There could be 0 demand but it would cost them nothing to keep them in the store.Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Massive_Stain wrote: »There's literally no reason to buy all skyshards unless you are really that lazy and have lots of money to spend. I'm disappointed cyrodil shards aren't there tbh. Those would be the ones I'm really interested in
If there wasnt a reason to buy the damn things, it wouldnt be in the store would it? You would think that if a company didnt think they could make a buck off of something they wouldnt bother spending resources creating a means to unlock such a thing on a character.
There has been a large demand for this by the playerbase due to those players not having the time or energy to constantly chase down skyshards on every character they want to make. But the amount of money ZOS wants for said players to pay out to unlock all of the skyshards is the inexcusable part of this.
"Unless you are really that lazy and have lots of money to spend". They didn't say there was no reason, they just said there was no reason unless... Just like there's no reason to buy any of the cosmetic stuff, unless you like the way it looks and want to buy it for your characters or account.
Supply and demand is a wonderful system. If there were a large supply of overpriced skyshards But no demand for them, then there wouldn't be very much benefit to the company for trying to sell them. So, I would wager, that if the company doesn't sell very many of these skyshard packs, they will likely lower the price or change how the pack operates. However, I would also wager, that there are going to be enough people who purchase these packs to justify them being the way that they are. Whether or not some of the other players do or don't like it.
Facefister wrote: »You forget that those don't have shelf-life. It costs near zero to add some lines of code into the shop. There could be 0 demand but it would cost them nothing to keep them in the store.Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Massive_Stain wrote: »There's literally no reason to buy all skyshards unless you are really that lazy and have lots of money to spend. I'm disappointed cyrodil shards aren't there tbh. Those would be the ones I'm really interested in
If there wasnt a reason to buy the damn things, it wouldnt be in the store would it? You would think that if a company didnt think they could make a buck off of something they wouldnt bother spending resources creating a means to unlock such a thing on a character.
There has been a large demand for this by the playerbase due to those players not having the time or energy to constantly chase down skyshards on every character they want to make. But the amount of money ZOS wants for said players to pay out to unlock all of the skyshards is the inexcusable part of this.
"Unless you are really that lazy and have lots of money to spend". They didn't say there was no reason, they just said there was no reason unless... Just like there's no reason to buy any of the cosmetic stuff, unless you like the way it looks and want to buy it for your characters or account.
Supply and demand is a wonderful system. If there were a large supply of overpriced skyshards But no demand for them, then there wouldn't be very much benefit to the company for trying to sell them. So, I would wager, that if the company doesn't sell very many of these skyshard packs, they will likely lower the price or change how the pack operates. However, I would also wager, that there are going to be enough people who purchase these packs to justify them being the way that they are. Whether or not some of the other players do or don't like it.
russelmmendoza wrote: »I am so frustrated with the any race any alliance token, I thought they were helping players by putting faction locks on campaign. To help curb the faction hopping in cyrodiil.
Then they come out with this anyrace anyalliance token, damnnnnmn!!!!!!!!!!!
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »Keep in mind this is on top of an "optional membership" that isn't quite optional for anyone that plays in any serious capacity,
albertberku wrote: »I dont really care about the crown store or prices. I buy what i want, i would still buy if everything would be 10x more expensive than their current prices. But if you design something to be a grind, and then allow people to pay for it to avoid the grind, then it is not OPTIONAL. It is a grind by design and it is designed to make some people pay. If there would be no payment option the grind would be less. I am not judging if it is right or wrong, i dont care at all. But all these "Optional" comments are just so naive.
Ydrisselle wrote: »russelmmendoza wrote: »I am so frustrated with the any race any alliance token, I thought they were helping players by putting faction locks on campaign. To help curb the faction hopping in cyrodiil.
Then they come out with this anyrace anyalliance token, damnnnnmn!!!!!!!!!!!
It doesn't allow to change your alliance.
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »It's entirely defensible:
- It's optional.
- It requires that you've already collected the skyshards on another character.
- it's optional.
- it's granular to the zone level; you won't find many people buying the full set.
- it's optional.
- Given point #2, it doesn't prey on new players: you've done it once, so you know what you're getting into.
- It's optional.
Don't like it, don't buy it. I won't, but I'm certainly not troubled by a pay-to-catch-up mechanic. There are drastically bigger issues in ESO I can spend my time worrying about.
This "don't like it don't buy it" mentality is precisely why we're in the situation we're in now. This is some cancerous Nexon-tier monetization.
albertberku wrote: »I dont really care about the crown store or prices. I buy what i want, i would still buy if everything would be 10x more expensive than their current prices. But if you design something to be a grind, and then allow people to pay for it to avoid the grind, then it is not OPTIONAL. It is a grind by design and it is designed to make some people pay. If there would be no payment option the grind would be less. I am not judging if it is right or wrong, i dont care at all. But all these "Optional" comments are just so naive.
Optional- adjective- available to be chosen but not obligatory
I haven't bought any of these skyshard packs, and I play just fine. I think you misunderstand what the word optional means, hence why I posted what the dictionary says the meaning is.
Just because you feel that they're pushing you to pay for something, doesn't mean you're required to do so. You're not going to automatically lose by not paying. Your characters aren't going to be weaker because you didn't pay for more skyshards. All of your lock picks aren't going to automatically break because you didn't buy the skyshard packs.You aren't going to suddenly be unable to complete content due to a lack of paying for skyshards.
The only thing naive is your belief that the words optional and obligatory are synonymous.
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »The defense force for this saying "it's optional!" is disgusting. It's not even account-wide for Christ's sake.