could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Still u NEVER will be able to get those title at lvl 10. and if u made it with your pet/shield sorc dont mena that u deserve to run flawless title on your stamplar?
if you want separate achieves for role, I'm fine with that. I'd say it's pretty clear that someone probably didn't clear vMoL as a tank on their DPS or by DPSing with their healer...Merlin13KAGL wrote: »It has entirely nothing to do with people playing a different class/role.Of course it is optional. Playing ESO is optional.
This is merely a request to make end game players that collect achievements have more room to play their alt and try different play style.
It encourage people to play different class and different role.
Its a good thing.
Just because you can clear (enter content here) on your templar healer, does not automatically mean you can clear same content on your NB DPS or your Warden tank. The good stuff, skins, dyes, costumes, are already account wide once you unlock them.
What (missing) achievement is the one that bothers you so?Actually, it's both. See above.could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Yes it is the player who complete the achievement not the toon, that is the logic behind it.
Clearance on one does not automatically guarantee clearance on the other, and different roles/classes play very differently, requiring different levels of mastery.
Well in that case then toons are not supposed to change skills and roles, but they can and they do.
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »if you want separate achieves for role, I'm fine with that. I'd say it's pretty clear that someone probably didn't clear vMoL as a tank on their DPS or by DPSing with their healer...Merlin13KAGL wrote: »It has entirely nothing to do with people playing a different class/role.Of course it is optional. Playing ESO is optional.
This is merely a request to make end game players that collect achievements have more room to play their alt and try different play style.
It encourage people to play different class and different role.
Its a good thing.
Just because you can clear (enter content here) on your templar healer, does not automatically mean you can clear same content on your NB DPS or your Warden tank. The good stuff, skins, dyes, costumes, are already account wide once you unlock them.
What (missing) achievement is the one that bothers you so?Actually, it's both. See above.could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Yes it is the player who complete the achievement not the toon, that is the logic behind it.
Clearance on one does not automatically guarantee clearance on the other, and different roles/classes play very differently, requiring different levels of mastery.
Well in that case then toons are not supposed to change skills and roles, but they can and they do.
Again, what achivement are you missing that precludes you playing the game?
If anything it adds more unnecessary grind to the game for example I don't have a lot of skill points on my Mag DK but my Stam has almost all since it's my main; It would be nice to get all my skill points on my Mag DK too.
Judging by how hostile some people are about this account wide comment.
I suspect they make real money out of it from illegal service of some sort ? Perhaps selling achievements ?
I dont know i just find it absurd to see a very select few seems to really go against it when they got nothing to lose (or do they ?)
No, people are against the idea because they don't like it.
When people disagree with you, it is not because they are somehow breaking the rules or making money out of something. It's simply because they don't agree with your idea.
Well the last vote shows more people wants it.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
I am simply wondering why the nayers are so loud.
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »if you want separate achieves for role, I'm fine with that. I'd say it's pretty clear that someone probably didn't clear vMoL as a tank on their DPS or by DPSing with their healer...Merlin13KAGL wrote: »It has entirely nothing to do with people playing a different class/role.Of course it is optional. Playing ESO is optional.
This is merely a request to make end game players that collect achievements have more room to play their alt and try different play style.
It encourage people to play different class and different role.
Its a good thing.
Just because you can clear (enter content here) on your templar healer, does not automatically mean you can clear same content on your NB DPS or your Warden tank. The good stuff, skins, dyes, costumes, are already account wide once you unlock them.
What (missing) achievement is the one that bothers you so?Actually, it's both. See above.could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Yes it is the player who complete the achievement not the toon, that is the logic behind it.
Clearance on one does not automatically guarantee clearance on the other, and different roles/classes play very differently, requiring different levels of mastery.
Well in that case then toons are not supposed to change skills and roles, but they can and they do.
Again, what achivement are you missing that precludes you playing the game?
Nothing, this is a request to improve the game.
Look, there is a ridiculous amount of achievement to keep up with in this game with DLC and all.
As someone who tries to get everything, we are stuck with one toon. While we have many other that we would like to have fun with thats it.
And it doesnt affect you, if you dont care about achievements just dont look at it. If you do then this would give you the choice to play all the other 5 classes and 3 roles as youd like. Its in the spirit of ESO.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
You realize you kind of counter your own argument with this, right?Merlin13KAGL wrote: »if you want separate achieves for role, I'm fine with that. I'd say it's pretty clear that someone probably didn't clear vMoL as a tank on their DPS or by DPSing with their healer...Merlin13KAGL wrote: »It has entirely nothing to do with people playing a different class/role.Of course it is optional. Playing ESO is optional.
This is merely a request to make end game players that collect achievements have more room to play their alt and try different play style.
It encourage people to play different class and different role.
Its a good thing.
Just because you can clear (enter content here) on your templar healer, does not automatically mean you can clear same content on your NB DPS or your Warden tank. The good stuff, skins, dyes, costumes, are already account wide once you unlock them.
What (missing) achievement is the one that bothers you so?Actually, it's both. See above.could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Yes it is the player who complete the achievement not the toon, that is the logic behind it.
Clearance on one does not automatically guarantee clearance on the other, and different roles/classes play very differently, requiring different levels of mastery.
Well in that case then toons are not supposed to change skills and roles, but they can and they do.
Again, what achivement are you missing that precludes you playing the game?
Nothing, this is a request to improve the game.
Look, there is a ridiculous amount of achievement to keep up with in this game with DLC and all.
As someone who tries to get everything, we are stuck with one toon. While we have many other that we would like to have fun with thats it.
And it doesnt affect you, if you dont care about achievements just dont look at it. If you do then this would give you the choice to play all the other 5 classes and 3 roles as youd like. Its in the spirit of ESO.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
The Uninvited wrote: »Only thing I wish to be account wide is mount speed and stamina
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »You realize you kind of counter your own argument with this, right?Merlin13KAGL wrote: »if you want separate achieves for role, I'm fine with that. I'd say it's pretty clear that someone probably didn't clear vMoL as a tank on their DPS or by DPSing with their healer...Merlin13KAGL wrote: »It has entirely nothing to do with people playing a different class/role.Of course it is optional. Playing ESO is optional.
This is merely a request to make end game players that collect achievements have more room to play their alt and try different play style.
It encourage people to play different class and different role.
Its a good thing.
Just because you can clear (enter content here) on your templar healer, does not automatically mean you can clear same content on your NB DPS or your Warden tank. The good stuff, skins, dyes, costumes, are already account wide once you unlock them.
What (missing) achievement is the one that bothers you so?Actually, it's both. See above.could be odd to run arround in low lvl char like lvl 10 with a Grand Overlord title? or Flawless? or any other title u just dont get the first hour u play the game?
As a player who has flawless and dromathra destroyer on multiple charachters, i would still like them to be accountwide aswell, it is not the characer who completed it, but the player behind the screen
Yes it is the player who complete the achievement not the toon, that is the logic behind it.
Clearance on one does not automatically guarantee clearance on the other, and different roles/classes play very differently, requiring different levels of mastery.
Well in that case then toons are not supposed to change skills and roles, but they can and they do.
Again, what achivement are you missing that precludes you playing the game?
Nothing, this is a request to improve the game.
Look, there is a ridiculous amount of achievement to keep up with in this game with DLC and all.
As someone who tries to get everything, we are stuck with one toon. While we have many other that we would like to have fun with thats it.
And it doesnt affect you, if you dont care about achievements just dont look at it. If you do then this would give you the choice to play all the other 5 classes and 3 roles as youd like. Its in the spirit of ESO.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
If you're truly a completionist, you'd want to earn those on all alts. if you're not (you're basically asking for credit from a different alt), the most of the missing achieves won't matter one way or the other.
If you're looking for an account-wide summary of achieves, that's something I could be on board with.
Also, I have to assume you're talking about all achieves, not just things like Undaunted, shards, lorebooks, etc?
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Judging by how hostile some people are about this account wide comment.
I suspect they make real money out of it from illegal service of some sort ? Perhaps selling achievements ?
I dont know i just find it absurd to see a very select few seems to really go against it when they got nothing to lose (or do they ?)
No, people are against the idea because they don't like it.
When people disagree with you, it is not because they are somehow breaking the rules or making money out of something. It's simply because they don't agree with your idea.
Well the last vote shows more people wants it.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
I am simply wondering why the nayers are so loud.
you need to realize that forum polls mean nothing. they do not represent the player base.
VaranisArano wrote: »There are a lot of achievements that are specific to characters - anything combat related, for one. You don't fight the same on different characters so it wouldn't make sense for characters to share those achievements without earning them.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Judging by how hostile some people are about this account wide comment.
I suspect they make real money out of it from illegal service of some sort ? Perhaps selling achievements ?
I dont know i just find it absurd to see a very select few seems to really go against it when they got nothing to lose (or do they ?)
No, people are against the idea because they don't like it.
When people disagree with you, it is not because they are somehow breaking the rules or making money out of something. It's simply because they don't agree with your idea.
Well the last vote shows more people wants it.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
I am simply wondering why the nayers are so loud.
you need to realize that forum polls mean nothing. they do not represent the player base.
lol you need to realize that it means something.
Its an indication, a sample that represents a whole.
You could argue with its size. But thats the data that we have.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319473/do-u-want-account-wide-achievement-titles
PeteDahhSneak wrote: »But it doesn't have to be black and white. There can be an account wide achievement score along with a character achievement score. Much how things are crafted by different players and labelled as such, at the bottom of an achievement where it shows you the title/dye you'd earn for completing it, it can be labelled as being completed by your other character and the date you did it. If you complete it again on another character, it doesn't count toward your account wide achievement score - only your character's score. Things like titles, skins could be kept as character achievements to keep the opposition happy, even though again I don't understand the logic behind it.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »But it doesn't have to be black and white. There can be an account wide achievement score along with a character achievement score. Much how things are crafted by different players and labelled as such, at the bottom of an achievement where it shows you the title/dye you'd earn for completing it, it can be labelled as being completed by your other character and the date you did it. If you complete it again on another character, it doesn't count toward your account wide achievement score - only your character's score. Things like titles, skins could be kept as character achievements to keep the opposition happy, even though again I don't understand the logic behind it.
Frankly what I don't understand is the logic of people who care about achievements if there's no title/skin/dye/reward attached to them.
Whenever I roll a new character, there are useful things that need to be done (lorebooks, skyshards, leveling legderdemain, crafts, skill lines, discovering wayshrines, etc. ) . But achievements ? Why not just ignore the ones that you don't feel like doing again and go on with your game ? Let's consider the highest achievement score of all your characters to be your (as a player) achievement score and be done with it ... ?
PeteDahhSneak wrote: »There are different reasons people play the game. Some people just do dungeons/trials, some people sit in BG/Cyrodiil. I try to do everything the game has to offer. More specifically, I try to what ZOS tells me is an 'achievement'. But from what I'm seeing, the theme for those who are against this is "I don't get it, stop caring about achievements, it's fine the way it is". Well no, it's how I enjoy the game, and if I was capable of contributing to say, killing 1000 dwarven constructs on an ALT, I'd do that instead of getting off and playing another game because I'm tired of using the same skills on my templar that I've been using for 2½ years. Having (some) account wide achievements doesn't affect you at all. The naysayers are the ones who don't care about achievements. So.. what am I missing here?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »There are different reasons people play the game. Some people just do dungeons/trials, some people sit in BG/Cyrodiil. I try to do everything the game has to offer. More specifically, I try to what ZOS tells me is an 'achievement'. But from what I'm seeing, the theme for those who are against this is "I don't get it, stop caring about achievements, it's fine the way it is". Well no, it's how I enjoy the game, and if I was capable of contributing to say, killing 1000 dwarven constructs on an ALT, I'd do that instead of getting off and playing another game because I'm tired of using the same skills on my templar that I've been using for 2½ years. Having (some) account wide achievements doesn't affect you at all. The naysayers are the ones who don't care about achievements. So.. what am I missing here?
That makes sense. Hadn't seen it that way.
I think the point where we disagree is that you put the player in the 1st position (the character being just a "tool", and you want to swap tools every now and then) and I put the character first. I like to have my game absolutely clean and blank when I start a new character, and I like this character to have its own path, adventure, progress and choices.
So that's incompatible (not saying one approach is better than the other).
Actually you made me think it over. I'm still against account-wide achievements (at character level), but I would/will support your suggestion of an account-based summary and result. I think that could make everyone happy.
PeteDahhSneak wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »But it doesn't have to be black and white. There can be an account wide achievement score along with a character achievement score. Much how things are crafted by different players and labelled as such, at the bottom of an achievement where it shows you the title/dye you'd earn for completing it, it can be labelled as being completed by your other character and the date you did it. If you complete it again on another character, it doesn't count toward your account wide achievement score - only your character's score. Things like titles, skins could be kept as character achievements to keep the opposition happy, even though again I don't understand the logic behind it.
Frankly what I don't understand is the logic of people who care about achievements if there's no title/skin/dye/reward attached to them.
Whenever I roll a new character, there are useful things that need to be done (lorebooks, skyshards, leveling legderdemain, crafts, skill lines, discovering wayshrines, etc. ) . But achievements ? Why not just ignore the ones that you don't feel like doing again and go on with your game ? Let's consider the highest achievement score of all your characters to be your (as a player) achievement score and be done with it ... ?
There are different reasons people play the game. Some people just do dungeons/trials, some people sit in BG/Cyrodiil. I try to do everything the game has to offer. More specifically, I try to what ZOS tells me is an 'achievement'. But from what I'm seeing, the theme for those who are against this is "I don't get it, stop caring about achievements, it's fine the way it is". Well no, it's how I enjoy the game, and if I was capable of contributing to say, killing 1000 dwarven constructs on an ALT, I'd do that instead of getting off and playing another game because I'm tired of using the same skills on my templar that I've been using for 2½ years. Having (some) account wide achievements doesn't affect you at all. The naysayers are the ones who don't care about achievements. So.. what am I missing here?
Judging by how hostile some people are about this account wide comment.
I suspect they make real money out of it from illegal service of some sort ? Perhaps selling achievements ?
I dont know i just find it absurd to see a very select few seems to really go against it when they got nothing to lose (or do they ?)
SydneyGrey wrote: »The only kind of achievements I'd want account-wide are the ones that take ridiculously long to get, like the I Like Ma'iq one, or the fishing achievement. Pretty much 99% of the rest I'm fine with not being account-wide. If everything was account-wide, then there'd be no more achievements to strive for after a while.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »But it doesn't have to be black and white. There can be an account wide achievement score along with a character achievement score. Much how things are crafted by different players and labelled as such, at the bottom of an achievement where it shows you the title/dye you'd earn for completing it, it can be labelled as being completed by your other character and the date you did it. If you complete it again on another character, it doesn't count toward your account wide achievement score - only your character's score. Things like titles, skins could be kept as character achievements to keep the opposition happy, even though again I don't understand the logic behind it.
Frankly what I don't understand is the logic of people who care about achievements if there's no title/skin/dye/reward attached to them.
Whenever I roll a new character, there are useful things that need to be done (lorebooks, skyshards, leveling legderdemain, crafts, skill lines, discovering wayshrines, etc. ) . But achievements ? Why not just ignore the ones that you don't feel like doing again and go on with your game ? Let's consider the highest achievement score of all your characters to be your (as a player) achievement score and be done with it ... ?
There are different reasons people play the game. Some people just do dungeons/trials, some people sit in BG/Cyrodiil. I try to do everything the game has to offer. More specifically, I try to what ZOS tells me is an 'achievement'. But from what I'm seeing, the theme for those who are against this is "I don't get it, stop caring about achievements, it's fine the way it is". Well no, it's how I enjoy the game, and if I was capable of contributing to say, killing 1000 dwarven constructs on an ALT, I'd do that instead of getting off and playing another game because I'm tired of using the same skills on my templar that I've been using for 2½ years. Having (some) account wide achievements doesn't affect you at all. The naysayers are the ones who don't care about achievements. So.. what am I missing here?
i think i qualify as a naysayer..... but i do care about achievements.
Judging by how hostile some people are about this account wide comment.
I suspect they make real money out of it from illegal service of some sort ? Perhaps selling achievements ?
I dont know i just find it absurd to see a very select few seems to really go against it when they got nothing to lose (or do they ?)
But I do have something to lose. I lose the sense of achievement for getting the 1000 chest achievement on my 4th character.
Or the joy of getting a Daedric General on a character that still needs that one (I already completed this on 3 characters).
Also the annoyance of getting the Flawless Tailfeather on 2 "wrong" characters before I got it on my collector.
And the warm and fuzzy feeling of finding a "new" skyshard.
Or the sense of accomplishment of finishing a hard achievement on more than one class.
And the general ability of tracking what my characters have or haven't done on an individual basis.
Having achievements by character is a plus for me.SydneyGrey wrote: »The only kind of achievements I'd want account-wide are the ones that take ridiculously long to get, like the I Like Ma'iq one, or the fishing achievement. Pretty much 99% of the rest I'm fine with not being account-wide. If everything was account-wide, then there'd be no more achievements to strive for after a while.
Nooooo... not M'aiq! Must get I Like M'aiq on all characters!!!
PeteDahhSneak wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »PeteDahhSneak wrote: »But it doesn't have to be black and white. There can be an account wide achievement score along with a character achievement score. Much how things are crafted by different players and labelled as such, at the bottom of an achievement where it shows you the title/dye you'd earn for completing it, it can be labelled as being completed by your other character and the date you did it. If you complete it again on another character, it doesn't count toward your account wide achievement score - only your character's score. Things like titles, skins could be kept as character achievements to keep the opposition happy, even though again I don't understand the logic behind it.
Frankly what I don't understand is the logic of people who care about achievements if there's no title/skin/dye/reward attached to them.
Whenever I roll a new character, there are useful things that need to be done (lorebooks, skyshards, leveling legderdemain, crafts, skill lines, discovering wayshrines, etc. ) . But achievements ? Why not just ignore the ones that you don't feel like doing again and go on with your game ? Let's consider the highest achievement score of all your characters to be your (as a player) achievement score and be done with it ... ?
There are different reasons people play the game. Some people just do dungeons/trials, some people sit in BG/Cyrodiil. I try to do everything the game has to offer. More specifically, I try to what ZOS tells me is an 'achievement'. But from what I'm seeing, the theme for those who are against this is "I don't get it, stop caring about achievements, it's fine the way it is". Well no, it's how I enjoy the game, and if I was capable of contributing to say, killing 1000 dwarven constructs on an ALT, I'd do that instead of getting off and playing another game because I'm tired of using the same skills on my templar that I've been using for 2½ years. Having (some) account wide achievements doesn't affect you at all. The naysayers are the ones who don't care about achievements. So.. what am I missing here?
i think i qualify as a naysayer..... but i do care about achievements.
Why are you a naysayer?
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »the idea that one toon getting any achievement means that any other i create should get the same thing is just silly. what, i get a bsc so my children should also get one without doing the work?