Androconium wrote: »Then there are the blatantly sexist and racist loading screens. You all know them well enough by now.
All the white characters are beautiful; all the thieves have dark skin; all the ugly people are animals.
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »
Not of the comment, of the "incident" itself.
Queen Ayrenn is a serious hotty - even my thick-as-brick Nord thinks so.
All The Best
I can't even imagine what the incident would be. Too many possible interpretations.
lordrichter wrote: »Ratings of M/18 don't require that everything be sexualized. I think it is fine as it is.
ESO is the most "family friendly" Elder Scrolls release. Then again Elder Scrolls has been editing/censoring lore books since Skyrim.
That said, the outfits for female characters and female NPCs are mainly designed for men and are very much over-sexualized. It really doesn't make much sense to me that ESO has skimpy outfits but at the same time is afraid of uncensored lore.
I suppose what I'm saying is that it's ridiculous to censor lore while at the same time having skimpy outfits all over the place. Characters aren't and shouldn't be PC as that is who they are -- the same goes for lore -- but outfits are completely on the Dev.
Do you think the game's content is overly sexualized, appropriately humorous, or too prudish?
Some examples:
- Dark Seducers telling you, "You look like a sturdy one. Shall I treat you to my whip or my riding crop?"
- Constant references to "sleek Khajiit" and "sweet meat."
- Queen Ayrenn's reference to an incident involving a purple velvet dress and a drunken schoolmarm.
- Lorebooks titled "The Lusty Argonian Maid" with very suggestive content
- Spider daedra bosses telling you they are waiting in anticipation and not to keep them waiting any longer
- Womanizing-like comments on the part of Razum-Dar
- The quest involving the naked nord
- The quest involving the other nord who lost his pants
- Other similar examples (feel free to list below)
Valkysas154 wrote: »