ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.
purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »Sounds like bait and switch.
psychotrip wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »Sounds like bait and switch.
How do you mean?
Prof_Bawbag wrote: »Maybe I'm reading waaaaaaaay too much into what Gina said, but it seems these changes are indeed intentional rather than being a 'bug'. If it was indeed a bug, why would they need to talk through "options", why not discussing possible fixes?
purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »Sounds like bait and switch.
How do you mean?
I don't understand the logic behind offering something, selling it on the basis that players can even preview it and then changing it for no apparent reason. If there was an exploit to be fixed that's fine but provide warning of what you are about to do and give the reasoning. They have the right to do this, yes, but is it good business practice? 8magine that all these fantastic mounts everyone bought were suddenly changed into lifeless donkeys. Not cool right? Why? Because that's not what you bought. I don't think I'm exaggerating when you consider that players are losing decorations they payed for.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.
I think what has everyone scratching their head is this: Why mess with these things at all?
Whether it's shrinking a cavern, removing windows from a house, seaweed from a beach or changing lanterns/lighting that was purchased in good faith, changing something after the buyer has spent crowns on it isn't very ethical no matter whether legal/TOS compliant or not.
It's like if someone bought a new car, and a month later they woke up one morning to find that the dealer had stopped by in the middle of the night and removed the rear window while the car was parked in the driveway. I think that's how people feel about this.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.
JasonSilverSpring wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hi everyone, apologies for the delay in replying. We're talking through some possible options, and will let you know what we plan to do regarding these changes. Will keep you all in the loop and let you know what's decided as soon as possible.
@ZOS_GinaBruno, are you all also looking into the changes to Hunding's Palatial Hall (missing items on beach) and Mathiisen Manor (windows removed from interior)?
Have there been any changes to any other homes?
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
By the way... whatever options are presented for a fix... the raining inside a house really has to be fixed above anything else. It's very annoying, never used to be this way, and doesn't make any logical sense.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
Lady_Rosabella wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
@ZOS_GinaBruno so you're gonna take livable space away from others who used those spaces because some idiot decided they wanted to see if they could access the unplayable areas? What ever happened to using invisible walls, say at the edge of the water? Hubby and I had planned on buying more furnished crown store houses, as we each have already bought three, but we will not be spending cash on another, if this is going to happen.
You should at least remove the "Invisible Wall" you used on the opposite side that contains so much livable space and that already has a solid stone wall to keep people like that from accessing unplayable areas. That's the least you can do for punishing so many for the actions of a few.
Oh and btw, thanks for letting everyone know in advance so they could remove the items they had placed in those areas instead of them being loss under giant boulders. Obviously, by your responses on June 6-7, Gina you didn't even know they were doing this, apologies to you for being kept in the dark along with everyone who purchased the cavern.
And I suppose the raining inside the cavern and the hanging lanterns not swinging anymore and being stuck in a sideways position was intentional as well?
Hubby and I have been loyal plus members since July 2014, never missed a month of paying $14.99 EACH and have bought numerous, and I mean numerous Crown Packs. We have stuck with ZOS even when nearly everyone we played with since the beginning has left this game. And this is what you do to paying customers and people who spend money on Crowns to keep the game going and so the staff can get paid? I think it's time to reflect on where your loyalties lie.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
Tavore1138 wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
OK That's super, if very angry making for those that own it - why does the Mathiesen house need it's windows bricked up and why did Hundings need it's random decorations removed?
Tavore1138 wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.
OK That's super, if very angry making for those that own it - why does the Mathiesen house need it's windows bricked up and why did Hundings need it's random decorations removed?
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Ok everyone, regarding the changes made to Earthtear Cavern, this was actually an intentional change in order to prevent an issue where you could access an unplayable area outside of the home. As such, we will not be reverting this change since it was done to fix an issue. These changes went live sooner than we expected, which is why there wasn't a documented patch note for it; we apologize for the confusion this caused.