None. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses in different game types, roles, builds etc. There are too many variables to consider one better than the other.
For example nightblades suffer in end game pve but excel in pvp. So do they suck or are they good? Well, both... depends on the situation.
So yeah, pointless and generic poll, no offence
Dragonknights make you think, "Awesome powerful swordsman." But 98% of it's skills and morphs are Magicka. Dragonknights lose their appeal drastically when you're forced to use a Staff in order to make full use of the class.
You do realize ganking requires a fair bit of skill, many NBs are glass cannons and only get 1 chance to kill their victim, if they fail their initial attack are usually screwed. many need to utulize stealth as they do not have the defense to fight in the open.None. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses in different game types, roles, builds etc. There are too many variables to consider one better than the other.
For example nightblades suffer in end game pve but excel in pvp. So do they suck or are they good? Well, both... depends on the situation.
So yeah, pointless and generic poll, no offence
I almost never see any good nb stam or mag on pvp, I see only gangers who arnt to skilled and nonstop I see skilled especially sorcs, dk's and just healbots
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »You do realize ganking requires a fair bit of skill, many NBs are glass cannons and only get 1 chance to kill their victim, if they fail their initial attack are usually screwed. many need to utulize stealth as they do not have the defense to fight in the open.None. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses in different game types, roles, builds etc. There are too many variables to consider one better than the other.
For example nightblades suffer in end game pve but excel in pvp. So do they suck or are they good? Well, both... depends on the situation.
So yeah, pointless and generic poll, no offence
I almost never see any good nb stam or mag on pvp, I see only gangers who arnt to skilled and nonstop I see skilled especially sorcs, dk's and just healbots
Whatelse73b14_ESO wrote: »Yep, none. Everyone has their preference and has a way to enjoy their play. You should've put a "none" option on this one really.
Magicka NB and Stamina DK!
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »You do realize ganking requires a fair bit of skill, many NBs are glass cannons and only get 1 chance to kill their victim, if they fail their initial attack are usually screwed. many need to utulize stealth as they do not have the defense to fight in the open.None. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses in different game types, roles, builds etc. There are too many variables to consider one better than the other.
For example nightblades suffer in end game pve but excel in pvp. So do they suck or are they good? Well, both... depends on the situation.
So yeah, pointless and generic poll, no offence
I almost never see any good nb stam or mag on pvp, I see only gangers who arnt to skilled and nonstop I see skilled especially sorcs, dk's and just healbots
IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »
IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »
StamDK is the worst Stam class in PvP. It has the lowest damage, no movement abilities, relies on a clunky spammable and is completely outclassed by stamsorc in every area apart from Spell resist.
That's really what you have to compare them to—stamsorcs. You do the same combos, you can run the same gear sets etc—and StamSorc will have more damage, more healing, more movement, more sustain and more group utility.
Stamplars have similar (slightly lesser healing), but possess more damage, more utility and more gear diversity. Example—you can run dualwield/2h with a setup like 2x Slime, 5x Ravager, 5x BonePirate—and that's because you aren't reliant upon the worst spammable in elder scrolls. Edit: Almost forgot, Stamplars are literally Tankier. 8% dmg reduction. It never ends.
Stamblades are in a class of their own, better damage, better sustain, better passives (have I mentioned passives yet? Because outside of Battleroar, DKs have the worst passives for Stam-based PvP) and more options for different playstyles. Oh, and they aren't reliant upon the worst spammable in elder scrolls. Oh, and they have the best stam ult in PvP.
Just because you can build a StamDK into an average class with decent damage/sustain etc—that doesn't diminish the fact that every other Stamclass is superior.
I'm not concerned with PvE—because from everything I've read all Stambuilds are sort of pointless in PvE right now. Although, from everything I've read/seen—StamDK is the highest end-game StamDD.
Read above for my thoughts on StamDK. It might be "Viable" in the sense that you can at least get some kills with it—it's still the worst Stamclass by a mile.
MagDKs in PvE are great DDs right now—maybe they're borderline unplayable next patch. As far as PvP, they're viable but have the worst sustain in Elder Scrolls. They're great in duels, they're great for Small-scale (2-4 man pvp) everything else—not really. No Magbuild really shines right now in solo play besides MagSorc. There's really no reason to bring a MagDK into organized group play (10-12 man) either as they offer nothing outside of an AoE heal debuff. So you have to ask at that point, do I want another destro ult ticking for 7-8k per sec, or a Standard? I'll take another destro ult.
They do at least have a place in PvP, I must stress that—there are areas where MagDK is BiS. StamDK? No—no to the power of a thousand. Even the people in PvP who want to build fortresses to sit there, hold block and do nothing—even in that Scenario it's better to have a blazplar than a dk.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »You do realize ganking requires a fair bit of skill, many NBs are glass cannons and only get 1 chance to kill their victim, if they fail their initial attack are usually screwed. many need to utulize stealth as they do not have the defense to fight in the open.None. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses in different game types, roles, builds etc. There are too many variables to consider one better than the other.
For example nightblades suffer in end game pve but excel in pvp. So do they suck or are they good? Well, both... depends on the situation.
So yeah, pointless and generic poll, no offence
I almost never see any good nb stam or mag on pvp, I see only gangers who arnt to skilled and nonstop I see skilled especially sorcs, dk's and just healbots
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »
StamDK is the worst Stam class in PvP. It has the lowest damage, no movement abilities, relies on a clunky spammable and is completely outclassed by stamsorc in every area apart from Spell resist.
That's really what you have to compare them to—stamsorcs. You do the same combos, you can run the same gear sets etc—and StamSorc will have more damage, more healing, more movement, more sustain and more group utility.
Stamplars have similar (slightly lesser healing), but possess more damage, more utility and more gear diversity. Example—you can run dualwield/2h with a setup like 2x Slime, 5x Ravager, 5x BonePirate—and that's because you aren't reliant upon the worst spammable in elder scrolls. Edit: Almost forgot, Stamplars are literally Tankier. 8% dmg reduction. It never ends.
Stamblades are in a class of their own, better damage, better sustain, better passives (have I mentioned passives yet? Because outside of Battleroar, DKs have the worst passives for Stam-based PvP) and more options for different playstyles. Oh, and they aren't reliant upon the worst spammable in elder scrolls. Oh, and they have the best stam ult in PvP.
Just because you can build a StamDK into an average class with decent damage/sustain etc—that doesn't diminish the fact that every other Stamclass is superior.
I'm not concerned with PvE—because from everything I've read all Stambuilds are sort of pointless in PvE right now. Although, from everything I've read/seen—StamDK is the highest end-game StamDD.
Read above for my thoughts on StamDK. It might be "Viable" in the sense that you can at least get some kills with it—it's still the worst Stamclass by a mile.
MagDKs in PvE are great DDs right now—maybe they're borderline unplayable next patch. As far as PvP, they're viable but have the worst sustain in Elder Scrolls. They're great in duels, they're great for Small-scale (2-4 man pvp) everything else—not really. No Magbuild really shines right now in solo play besides MagSorc. There's really no reason to bring a MagDK into organized group play (10-12 man) either as they offer nothing outside of an AoE heal debuff. So you have to ask at that point, do I want another destro ult ticking for 7-8k per sec, or a Standard? I'll take another destro ult.
They do at least have a place in PvP, I must stress that—there are areas where MagDK is BiS. StamDK? No—no to the power of a thousand. Even the people in PvP who want to build fortresses to sit there, hold block and do nothing—even in that Scenario it's better to have a blazplar than a dk.
Don't they have some sort of debuff that increases everyone's fire damage?