@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
go outside at midnight......look up.
the sky is air.... it is colourless. what you see during the day, if it's not cloudy, are photons scattering off of nitrogen molecules in the air.
depending on where you live looking at a clear sky either very early morning or very late afternoon/evening the sky has an orange/red tinge... angle of refraction comes into play there - again from molecules in the air.
nimander99 wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
go outside at midnight......look up.
the sky is air.... it is colourless. what you see during the day, if it's not cloudy, are photons scattering off of nitrogen molecules in the air.
depending on where you live looking at a clear sky either very early morning or very late afternoon/evening the sky has an orange/red tinge... angle of refraction comes into play there - again from molecules in the air.
Anyhooser, how bout them Gambling Boxes neh?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
Blackbird71 wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
Ok, let's extend the analogy a bit. Let's say that I'm a regular customer for a particular bakery, as I greatly enjoy their fresh-baked goods. After some time, this baker begins offering little boxes of assorted, mass-produced, dry, stale cookies (think: any local store brand version of Oreos, etc.). The next time I walk into this bakery, the owner points at the new boxes and suggests I try a few. I politely decline, as I have no interest in them and find them unappealing, and so I opt to get one of my usual fresh pastries of choice. While I personally don't care for the boxes, some people enjoy them as a quick snack, and they seem to sell rather well among certain customers. This continues for a while; every time I come in, the little boxes of dry bits are there, and I keep passing them by for the deliciousness of fresh goodness. Except that after a few weeks, I notice that things have been changing. Each week, the boxes seem to take up more and more of the bakery's inventory and shelf space. Meanwhile, there seems to be more and more wrong with the fresh-baked selection: first everything is a bit burnt, then there is too much salt. Some days, certain pastries are completely unavailable, and a few favorite items seem to have disappeared from the menu completely. One time I even find a loaf of bread covered in mold. I ask the baker about this drop in quality, and he tells me, "Yes, I know, I've been meaning to do something about that; don't worry, I'll get to it soon. In the meantime, have you tried a cookie box?" I give him a puzzled look and continue on my way. I keep coming back for a while longer, but in the space of a few months, the quality of the "fresh" goods in the bakery as degraded so far as to be wholly inedible, and there is hardly anything to choose from anyway, as 90% of the shelf space is now taken up by the dreaded boxes. In disgust, I turn around and leave what used to be my favorite bakery, both saddened and angered at what it has become, and at the prospect that I will never again enjoy one of their delicious pastries, as they no longer exist in any recognizable form.
So I go about searching for a new bakery, and after some time I find one that I enjoy. It's not the same as my previous bakery was, as the offerings are different, but it is good, the food is fresh and delicious. Pretty soon, I become a regular patron, and a stop in at this new bakery is a part of my daily routine. This goes on for several months, but then one day I enter my new favorite bakery and there on the counter is a small display of the exact same little boxes of assorted, mass-produced, dry, stale cookies that my previous bakery carried.
What should I do? Those boxes destroyed the previous bakery I used to enjoy, and I am filled with dread at the prospect that the same will happen to my new favorite bakery. Now I have a few options: I could keep coming to this new bakery, and buying their fresh goods for as long as I continue to enjoy them, knowing that eventually I'll be hunting for another shop. Or I could cut to the chase, sever all ties with this bakery now and go find someplace new without waiting for this one to go bad. Or I could complain to the owner of the new bakery, and make my apprehension known, explain what happened to my last bakery and let him know that if he continues to carry those boxes that he will lose me as a customer at the first sign that he is neglecting or altering his other products. If I take this last option, it is only on the hope that if enough other customers do likewise, the baker will rethink his decision to offer the dreaded product, or at the very least will be very attentive and mindful of his main products.
No, I don't know for certain that this baker will let these boxes dominate his business the way the previous baker did, but all the signs I have seen so far are pointing to the same chain of events occurring. And so, knowing that I really enjoy this bakery's offerings in their current state, while also not being one to sit quietly and just accept what I'm given, and not really being interested in having to find yet another bakery, I take this last option. I'm not telling the baker how to make his recipes, nor am I telling him how to run his business, but I am most definitely telling him what I as a consumer am willing to accept and pay for. If I'm lucky, he'll listen to me, and I'll be able to continue my patronage, but if not, then it's off to another bakery.
What you and others are doing is akin to coming into the bakery while I am telling the baker what I am willing and not willing to buy, and then telling me to shut up because (according to you) as a consumer, I shouldn't be expressing my purchase needs, wants, and conditions to the baker who supplies them. You keep pointing at the fresh goods in the bakery and saying, "they're still here, you have no right to complain!" Well, that's just it; they are still here for now, but I know from experience how quickly that may change, and I want to prevent that before it happens rather than sit around and wait for it to come about. Oh, and back at the old bakery, even at the very end, there were people just like you, pointing at the burnt and moldy pastries and telling me, "they're still here, you have no right to complain! The baker said he'd get around to making better stuff eventually, so you should just keep buying these!" No thank you! As a consumer, I have every right to "complain," or as I see it, to voice my opinion before things get bad and hope that they get better because of it.
Now to sidetrack just a bit, let's set all of that aside for a moment and wind back to the previous analogy, "One Tamriel" is around the corner, and if that's not swapping my scones for blueberry muffins, I don't know what is. Some may like blueberry muffins, some may not, but either way, the almond scones will no longer be available.
Blackbird71 wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
Ok, let's extend the analogy a bit. Let's say that I'm a regular customer for a particular bakery, as I greatly enjoy their fresh-baked goods. After some time, this baker begins offering little boxes of assorted, mass-produced, dry, stale cookies (think: any local store brand version of Oreos, etc.). The next time I walk into this bakery, the owner points at the new boxes and suggests I try a few. I politely decline, as I have no interest in them and find them unappealing, and so I opt to get one of my usual fresh pastries of choice. While I personally don't care for the boxes, some people enjoy them as a quick snack, and they seem to sell rather well among certain customers. This continues for a while; every time I come in, the little boxes of dry bits are there, and I keep passing them by for the deliciousness of fresh goodness. Except that after a few weeks, I notice that things have been changing. Each week, the boxes seem to take up more and more of the bakery's inventory and shelf space. Meanwhile, there seems to be more and more wrong with the fresh-baked selection: first everything is a bit burnt, then there is too much salt. Some days, certain pastries are completely unavailable, and a few favorite items seem to have disappeared from the menu completely. One time I even find a loaf of bread covered in mold. I ask the baker about this drop in quality, and he tells me, "Yes, I know, I've been meaning to do something about that; don't worry, I'll get to it soon. In the meantime, have you tried a cookie box?" I give him a puzzled look and continue on my way. I keep coming back for a while longer, but in the space of a few months, the quality of the "fresh" goods in the bakery as degraded so far as to be wholly inedible, and there is hardly anything to choose from anyway, as 90% of the shelf space is now taken up by the dreaded boxes. In disgust, I turn around and leave what used to be my favorite bakery, both saddened and angered at what it has become, and at the prospect that I will never again enjoy one of their delicious pastries, as they no longer exist in any recognizable form.
So I go about searching for a new bakery, and after some time I find one that I enjoy. It's not the same as my previous bakery was, as the offerings are different, but it is good, the food is fresh and delicious. Pretty soon, I become a regular patron, and a stop in at this new bakery is a part of my daily routine. This goes on for several months, but then one day I enter my new favorite bakery and there on the counter is a small display of the exact same little boxes of assorted, mass-produced, dry, stale cookies that my previous bakery carried.
What should I do? Those boxes destroyed the previous bakery I used to enjoy, and I am filled with dread at the prospect that the same will happen to my new favorite bakery. Now I have a few options: I could keep coming to this new bakery, and buying their fresh goods for as long as I continue to enjoy them, knowing that eventually I'll be hunting for another shop. Or I could cut to the chase, sever all ties with this bakery now and go find someplace new without waiting for this one to go bad. Or I could complain to the owner of the new bakery, and make my apprehension known, explain what happened to my last bakery and let him know that if he continues to carry those boxes that he will lose me as a customer at the first sign that he is neglecting or altering his other products. If I take this last option, it is only on the hope that if enough other customers do likewise, the baker will rethink his decision to offer the dreaded product, or at the very least will be very attentive and mindful of his main products.
No, I don't know for certain that this baker will let these boxes dominate his business the way the previous baker did, but all the signs I have seen so far are pointing to the same chain of events occurring. And so, knowing that I really enjoy this bakery's offerings in their current state, while also not being one to sit quietly and just accept what I'm given, and not really being interested in having to find yet another bakery, I take this last option. I'm not telling the baker how to make his recipes, nor am I telling him how to run his business, but I am most definitely telling him what I as a consumer am willing to accept and pay for. If I'm lucky, he'll listen to me, and I'll be able to continue my patronage, but if not, then it's off to another bakery.
What you and others are doing is akin to coming into the bakery while I am telling the baker what I am willing and not willing to buy, and then telling me to shut up because (according to you) as a consumer, I shouldn't be expressing my purchase needs, wants, and conditions to the baker who supplies them. You keep pointing at the fresh goods in the bakery and saying, "they're still here, you have no right to complain!" Well, that's just it; they are still here for now, but I know from experience how quickly that may change, and I want to prevent that before it happens rather than sit around and wait for it to come about. Oh, and back at the old bakery, even at the very end, there were people just like you, pointing at the burnt and moldy pastries and telling me, "they're still here, you have no right to complain! The baker said he'd get around to making better stuff eventually, so you should just keep buying these!" No thank you! As a consumer, I have every right to "complain," or as I see it, to voice my opinion before things get bad and hope that they get better because of it.
Now to sidetrack just a bit, let's set all of that aside for a moment and wind back to the previous analogy, "One Tamriel" is around the corner, and if that's not swapping my scones for blueberry muffins, I don't know what is. Some may like blueberry muffins, some may not, but either way, the almond scones will no longer be available.
Esquire1980g_ESO wrote: »MMORPG.com just got into the lockbox mix that's over here. The answer over there? Stop complaining.
http://www.mmorpg.com/showFeature.cfm/feature/11120/Five-Things-MMO-Gamers-Should-Stop-Complaining-About.html
Started a bit of a storm over there also. Advertising budget?
starkerealm wrote: »Every point you guys mentioned are all assumptions.
My god, you mean you don't have a 60 hour a week job that pulls in a six figure salary? The horror.Also all the Crown Store items are junk.
Yeah, you might want to go shout that on the PVP boards a little louder, given the Imperial race is in the crown shop.
No kidding? So when I purchased the Imperial Edition of ESO way way back a few years ago, I actually won the game?
Who knew?? Awesomeness! Yes 4 P2W!
starkerealm wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »Every point you guys mentioned are all assumptions.
My god, you mean you don't have a 60 hour a week job that pulls in a six figure salary? The horror.Also all the Crown Store items are junk.
Yeah, you might want to go shout that on the PVP boards a little louder, given the Imperial race is in the crown shop.
No kidding? So when I purchased the Imperial Edition of ESO way way back a few years ago, I actually won the game?
Who knew?? Awesomeness! Yes 4 P2W!
Yep, you can leave, you won all the things. Or, you know, you paid real money for a statistical advantage over other players, which is the actual definition for P2W. You could look it up, if you were so inclined.
They will, but I doubt it will be on the pts. They likely won't because if the chance is changed from pts to live people will be upset. They will likely keep them a mystery so you don't know how much they are ripping you off for.I don't know if this has been posted yet.
I just got done reading the PTS Patch Notes and did not read anything about Crown Crates. So maybe they will not be adding it in this this update.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
go outside at midnight......look up.
the sky is air.... it is colourless. what you see during the day, if it's not cloudy, are photons scattering off of nitrogen molecules in the air.
depending on where you live looking at a clear sky either very early morning or very late afternoon/evening the sky has an orange/red tinge... angle of refraction comes into play there - again from molecules in the air.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
go outside at midnight......look up.
the sky is air.... it is colourless. what you see during the day, if it's not cloudy, are photons scattering off of nitrogen molecules in the air.
depending on where you live looking at a clear sky either very early morning or very late afternoon/evening the sky has an orange/red tinge... angle of refraction comes into play there - again from molecules in the air.
What if I told you that the sky... was made of air???? I literally addressed your point in my comment which you quoted. Additionally, the midnight sky is blue, a very dark shade of blue, but scattered starlight does indeed lend it a blue hue. You can say that it's not blue "all the time", much how like a tomato isn't red all the time, depending on its ripeness, but arguing that it's not blue is another point of semantic nonsense that you're not going to get any traction with. :-p
Anyway, how long do you think before exclusive dye colors show up in the gambling boxes?
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »@anitajoneb17_ESOanitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Blackbird71 wrote: »If I have a standing order with a baker for two dozen almond scones each day, and one day he decides to stop making almond scones, and without consulting me instead gives me blueberry muffins when I show up for my order, I will definitely complain, demand a refund, and if necessary go to another bakery. That is my right as a consumer.
.../...
Now, if before changing his menu, the baker lets me know that he's considering discontinuing the almond scones, and I really enjoy his almond scones, I may take time to try to reason with the baker and convince him to keep making the scones.
.../...
This is representative of what you see in this thread and other places; ZOS has announced a planned change, and invested consumers are attempting to convince ZOS that they would prefer to continue with the game that they paid for, rather than to have it change into something that they didn't. .../...
Except that in this case, the baker is not discontinuing almond scones. He simply put another cake on his offer - which you don't have to buy and which doesn't impact your almond scones. Because you dislike that other cake, you think it's unhealthy, too expensive, the baker is too profit-oriented, etc. And because you're scared that this other cake will be so successful that your almonds will be discontinued (but we're not there yet and might never get there).
The baker will be interested in your feedback regarding this other cake. But don't start telling him how to bake them (you don't know his particular recipe), or how to make money (you know nothing of his cost structure). It's your favourite bakery but it doesn't make it your bakery.
For now our almond scones are NOT impacted. If you think the direction the baker is heading is bad, you might already look for another baker - that's your right. I prefer to enjoy the almond scones for as long as they're there. IF one day they're impacted or changed, I might change bakeries too, but for now it's fine for me. But I don't tell the baker how to bake nor how to run his business.
You're kind of missing some things in this analogy. For instance, the baker is still selling almond scones, but all the best scones are going inside an undetermined number of boxes. Also going inside the boxes, in undetermined amounts, are packs of 27 birthday candles, packages of paper plates, plastic forks, and sugar packets (all of which you can buy normally). All the boxes are guarantees to have one of those accessory items that you don't actually want or need (and can buy straight-up anyway), but the box also has a chance of containing a really good almond scone. Baker spends hours on these really special scones, you see, and they are of an indisputably higher quality than the ones that normally get sold. But the baker says you have to play the box game to get a chance at the good scones.
Now, this is not what your previous arrangement was, and it is super obvious to everyone that nobody actually wants to play the box game. But this baker is the only one that even sells almond scones, and the next single-serving scone isn't going to come out for years so it's pretty much this or nothing. Baker's got a copyright on scones, you see.
Under those circumstances, you are entirely within your right to tell the baker not to do that. Baker doesn't need to comply, but you can't tell someone they can't tell someone something when someone is telling something to someone sometimes. Actions don't exist in a vacuum and customer feedback is important to running a business.
Now buy this box from me, it occasionally contains a lesson on perspective.
- You don't have to care about what's inside the boxes if you don't intend to buy them anyway (which you don't, do you ?)
- The "premium scones" won't necessarily be better quality - so far, noone has seen them and only the baker says so.
- Even in the "premium scones" are of better quality, that doesn't make the standard scones less tasty, does it ? I don't want to sound patronizing here, but if you stop enjoying what you have just because there's something better that you can't have, you might experience frustration more often than necessary.
- And yes, baker has a copyright on THOSE scones, but there are other bakers with other scones which are very tasty too. And even then, you can also try something else but scones for breakfast. Don't let your well-being depend upon one single supplier !
- In terms of feedback, companies want to know what you like and dislike in their products, and why. They're not interested in you telling them what they should or shouldn't do.
- If you're right by saying that "nobody wants to play the box game", then don't worry : they won't last long. Products that don't sell don't last. Unfortunately, I think you're wrong and many people will play the box game. Which is why the baker does them.
- I do have to care about what's inside the boxes because the items inside them ought to be sold on the open market, not as an incentive to play the gambling box game.
- It's incredibly dishonest to argue that the premium scones won't be better quality, everyone knows it's going to happen. Not a logically sound argument there, but it's like arguing that the sky ain't blue.
- My regular scones are just fine, I like my regular scones. I buy so many regular scones, tell my friends about them, post pictures of them, and generally hype the scones. If the premium scones were on the normal market, I could do the same with those, and would love to do the same with those, and the baker wants me to do that with the premium scones, but I can only get a chance at them by playing with the gambling boxes. I can't stress enough that it's a CHANCE at getting them. No matter how much you spend, you are not ever guaranteed to get a premium scone. It's not about enjoying the regular scones less, it's about not having a reasonable avenue to enjoy the premium scones as well.
- I have plenty of baked goods from other stores, but this baker has The Elder Scones, so no, not really an option.
- Telling a company what you like and dislike is exactly equivalent to telling them what to do or not to do. You're not going to get any traction on this point, you are trying to play a semantics game that doesn't exist.
- You are misapprehending what I'm saying about the gambling boxes. Just because nobody wants to play the gambling game doesn't mean that people won't play. I don't like the process of sending out resumes, but I do it because there's a chance that I'll get hired by a better company. There is sufficient incentive to try. The difference is, the baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
just being pedantic here.... the sky isn't blue
I mean if we really want to go for it, color can be seen as a property of an object, not just a mere qualia, and as such we should be able to make a reproducible determination of an object's color. Thus, the sky IS often blue, at least componentially, due to the fact that our atmosphere scatters more blue light than light of other colors. You can measure the blueness with various colorimetry techniques. Of course, some might argue that an object's color is only a function of what light it reflects, not refracts, but that's not an especially useful distinction when it comes to normal human experiences.
go outside at midnight......look up.
the sky is air.... it is colourless. what you see during the day, if it's not cloudy, are photons scattering off of nitrogen molecules in the air.
depending on where you live looking at a clear sky either very early morning or very late afternoon/evening the sky has an orange/red tinge... angle of refraction comes into play there - again from molecules in the air.
What if I told you that the sky... was made of air???? I literally addressed your point in my comment which you quoted. Additionally, the midnight sky is blue, a very dark shade of blue, but scattered starlight does indeed lend it a blue hue. You can say that it's not blue "all the time", much how like a tomato isn't red all the time, depending on its ripeness, but arguing that it's not blue is another point of semantic nonsense that you're not going to get any traction with. :-p
Anyway, how long do you think before exclusive dye colors show up in the gambling boxes?
The baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »As to the rest (game will become P2W, developers will focus on crate items and not on the game, etc...) that's all extrapolation (based on other games, but still extrapolation).
Wow, listening to the PAX presentation I'm shocked that the boxes implementation will be even worse than we thought.
Wow, listening to the PAX presentation I'm shocked that the boxes implementation will be even worse than we thought.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »But even if enough or many people buy them (which is likely to be the case) it doesn't have to impact you.
I will never understand how people can be that bothered and frustrated about not being able to buy something non-essential.
nimander99 wrote: »
Is it so hard to understand that cosmetics are essential to some us?
How would you feel if they included, for example, dungeon access or whatever you may consider essential?
Edit: All we ask for is that every item that's intended for the crown crate, can be bought directly for crowns even if only for a limited time.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »As to the rest (game will become P2W, developers will focus on crate items and not on the game, etc...) that's all extrapolation (based on other games, but still extrapolation).
They have been selling advantages for cash since day 1, it did become only worse (markedly so) over time, and they do focus on the cash shop.
It is extrapolation based on this game, if an extrapolation at all.
GhostwalkerLD wrote: »It's good to see that more people are voting. Let's keep this thread going at least until 100 pages. Well over 1000 players have voted, and frankly I don't care that ZOS is just going to ignore them, we can at least say that we voiced our objections over these stupid lockboxes.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »The baker could just as easily not offer a gambling service. The baker, who really has no business offering a gambling service to begin with, can just sell their premium scones on the regular market. Bam, money made, problem solved. Not to be pedantic, but it shouldn't be that hard to grasp the concept.
You're not pedantic, you're simply rude.
Anyway, as an answer to you and to all who have commented later in the thread : I'm sorry but I still think you're making a whole fuss about nothing. Don't like boxes ? don't buy them, bam, problem solved. (also not very hard to grasp).
You're free to think you're entitled to tell ZOS what to do and what not to do - you're wasting your time, but hey, that's your call.
I insist that not buying the boxes is still the best way to get rid of them. But even if enough or many people buy them (which is likely to be the case) it doesn't have to impact you.
I will never understand how people can be that bothered and frustrated about not being able to buy something non-essential.
As to the rest (game will become P2W, developers will focus on crate items and not on the game, etc...) that's all extrapolation (based on other games, but still extrapolation). If it gets there with ESO, it will be soon enough to rage, quit or both over it.
But you're free to see everything negative.