HoloYoitsu wrote: »After being in all 3 factions, DC has consistently been by far the most toxic, salt filled refuse pile of any of them in the /zone pvp.God_flakes wrote: »Ghost-Shot wrote: »God_flakes wrote: »PrinceFabious wrote: »PrinceFabious wrote: »You do realize TWO zergs rerolled AD right?
Dont you play on Haderous? I certainly don't see you fighting TF at primetime.
Groups like you are why I dont play TF in prime time. Im glad you guys brag about stacking 24 people along with other pugs and guilds that rerolled. If you seriously think thats an accomplishment, then please, keep the guild retired. We dont need that trash
When was the last time your guild won a campaign?
LOL - wrong time to ask that question.
Personally dont care about winning campaigns. Dont know why anyone does, or finds any accomplishment in it. You better have a strong night force if you want to 'win campaigns'.
Not entirely true.
And they still lost.
I dont think they lost. I dont know what this picture is ?PrinceFabious wrote: »PrinceFabious wrote: »You do realize TWO zergs rerolled AD right?
Dont you play on Haderous? I certainly don't see you fighting TF at primetime.
Groups like you are why I dont play TF in prime time. Im glad you guys brag about stacking 24 people along with other pugs and guilds that rerolled. If you seriously think thats an accomplishment, then please, keep the guild retired. We dont need that trash
When was the last time your guild won a campaign?
LOL - wrong time to ask that question.
Personally dont care about winning campaigns. Dont know why anyone does, or finds any accomplishment in it. You better have a strong night force if you want to 'win campaigns'.
Some people care about winning campaigns because they are competitors and team players... Others are just selfish pr***s
Winning campaigns makes you a competitor? LOL. Nightcapping and zerging wins campaigns. Im sure youve embraced one or both of these to achieve your competitive desires.
Ataggs plays in my raid, and we hold the map primetime against groups 3-4 times our size. We did it for 30 days straight and won, that makes her a competitor, yes.
What a coincidence, FENGRUSH holds the map against groups 3-4 times his size too!
And notice how i don't come into your threads and talk *** to you about it.
I didnt come talking smack. I laughed at a very direct comment of someone trying to belittle someones comment by saying "whens the last time your guild won a campaign" - when that guys guild literally was the leading effort in winning the campaign. Total foot in mouth. Then it doesnt matter because 'it wasnt a competitive server, but a buff server' amongst other comments from your guild members.
But its FENGRUSH coming to "your thread' and talking trash? Its actually VE being overly defensive even when trolled and going out of their way to post their relevance. Keep it up. Fabious is on EP faction btw and generally doesnt speak too kindly of me. Niether do your members. I have no issues laughing at people making an idiot of themselves even to my enemies though. Loosen up, kids!
^^^
If anything, if I was AD I would be super insulted that one guild thinks they carried the entire faction to victory. I think all of us old timers realize it truly is a team effort-even when a faction doesn't work well together as a team. As we all know, the pvp community has become so thinned out, even just 24 more bodies in a faction can turn the tide in a campaign. That doesn't mean your guild single handedly won a campaign, it means your extra 24 men tipped the scales. Gratz AD, gratz Ve, happy retirement. Hope to see at least a few of you back on DC side.
Why would anyone want to go back to such a toxic faction?
Please let's not be melodramatic. All 3 factions have their toxicity and drama. Right now you guys are all rainbows and butterflies over Ad. It's whatever. If you're retiring-what do you care what other members of Ve do?
Particularly, the difference between DC and EP is like night and day.
If it wasn't for all the AD solo players, AD would have lost. Congrats solo players.
PrinceFabious wrote: »PrinceFabious wrote: »You do realize TWO zergs rerolled AD right?
Dont you play on Haderous? I certainly don't see you fighting TF at primetime.
Groups like you are why I dont play TF in prime time. Im glad you guys brag about stacking 24 people along with other pugs and guilds that rerolled. If you seriously think thats an accomplishment, then please, keep the guild retired. We dont need that trash
When was the last time your guild won a campaign?
LOL - wrong time to ask that question.
Personally dont care about winning campaigns. Dont know why anyone does, or finds any accomplishment in it. You better have a strong night force if you want to 'win campaigns'.
Some people care about winning campaigns because they are competitors and team players... Others are just selfish pr***s
Winning campaigns makes you a competitor? LOL. Nightcapping and zerging wins campaigns. Im sure youve embraced one or both of these to achieve your competitive desires.
Ataggs plays in my raid, and we hold the map primetime against groups 3-4 times our size. We did it for 30 days straight and won, that makes her a competitor, yes.
What a coincidence, FENGRUSH holds the map against groups 3-4 times his size too!
And notice how i don't come into your threads and talk *** to you about it.
If it wasn't for all the AD solo players, AD would have lost. Congrats solo players.
AD has some of the best quality solo players. I'm sorry, but having walks or mano running solo in a fight or making zone call outs does indeed help substantially. Our pugs were excellent counter siegers, something my group hates to do and something blue pugs were never as adept at doing. I only have blue to compare against, and while AD were better to have in the middle of a fight, blue did a better job scouting keeps and making zone call outs. Each had strengths.
Look, when the other side wins it's because of:
1. Zerging
2. lagging out the server
3. Keep stacking
4. purple, orange or green alliance
5. exploiting
6. night-capping
7. day-capping
8. afternoon-capping
9. Pv-dooring
10. an abundance of stupid potatoes
When your side wins, it's because of:
1. Strategy
2. Smarts
3. balls (and ovaries too)
4. well-made small-man groups
5. tight knit defense
6. razor sharp offense
7. honor
8. brave men and women
9. overcoming the purple, green or orange alliance
10. smart stupid potatoes
I play AD and like that we won, but if any side deserves some credit I would have to say blue did very well as they consistently lagged behind by 1 bar population wise for a couple hours at a time every day until prime time, and yet they still came within 1000 points of first.
Look, when the other side wins it's because of:
1. Zerging
2. lagging out the server
3. Keep stacking
4. purple, orange or green alliance
5. exploiting
6. night-capping
7. day-capping
8. afternoon-capping
9. Pv-dooring
10. an abundance of stupid potatoes
When your side wins, it's because of:
1. Strategy
2. Smarts
3. balls (and ovaries too)
4. well-made small-man groups
5. tight knit defense
6. razor sharp offense
7. honor
8. brave men and women
9. overcoming the purple, green or orange alliance
10. smart stupid potatoes
I play AD and like that we won, but if any side deserves some credit I would have to say blue did very well as they consistently lagged behind by 1 bar population wise for a couple hours at a time every day until prime time, and yet they still came within 1000 points of first.
booksmcread wrote: »
Look, when the other side wins it's because of:
1. Zerging
2. lagging out the server
3. Keep stacking
4. purple, orange or green alliance
5. exploiting
6. night-capping
7. day-capping
8. afternoon-capping
9. Pv-dooring
10. an abundance of stupid potatoes
When your side wins, it's because of:
1. Strategy
2. Smarts
3. balls (and ovaries too)
4. well-made small-man groups
5. tight knit defense
6. razor sharp offense
7. honor
8. brave men and women
9. overcoming the purple, green or orange alliance
10. smart stupid potatoes
I play AD and like that we won, but if any side deserves some credit I would have to say blue did very well as they consistently lagged behind by 1 bar population wise for a couple hours at a time every day until prime time, and yet they still came within 1000 points of first.
PrinceFabious wrote: »Wasnt VE on DC the two previous campaigns?????!!!?!?!?!
PrinceFabious wrote: »Wasnt VE on DC the two previous campaigns?????!!!?!?!?!
PrinceFabious wrote: »Wasnt VE on DC the two previous campaigns?????!!!?!?!?!
This cycle was the first time Ve fought entirely on AD? They would have to confirm.
PrinceFabious wrote: »Oh, so you played DC and lost the two previous campaigns. Cool. Im good now. DC response *but we didnt go as hard or tried hard, we let them win, we wainted until we had a nightcap guild like RAM to join us*
#1 guild VE