If you all hate it so much to give "real world examples", why the heck do you do it? Just stop it. No need to do things you hate. I promise, it will all be good even without them.liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »I hate to use real world examples but...
Yeah, I always find myself a little put down when the necklaces and rings aren't visible. A bone or even flower necklace would be nice, same goes for belts and gloves. The gloves can look well rather plain, and just having some extra detail could easily spruce em up.Snowstrider wrote: »HaldaAinur wrote: »I for one would like macho and pretty armor to appear. I don't mean boobs and butts huggers- just flattering, and decorated armor, for both sexes.
The armor we currently have is flattering, but sometimes we want something a little more grandoise, a little more flashy. Add a few flower patterns, spiky armor and such. I can think of plenty of ways to make girly heavy armor- ornate patterning/carvings in the metal, belts with more elegant designs, jewlerry you can actually see, nymph and tribal style costumes. Why not sell pattern/skin packs that you can apply to armor the same way you do dyes? Something as small as that can completely change a look. I like how so many people in this thread immediately assumed OP was demanding cleavage windows and lingerie...
I agree,I mean the armor in the game isnt detailed or unique at all wish we could have something with all kinds of accessoaries in them,More detailed armors like in the cinematic trailers
HaldaAinur wrote: »Yeah, I always find myself a little put down when the necklaces and rings aren't visible. A bone or even flower necklace would be nice, same goes for belts and gloves. The gloves can look well rather plain, and just having some extra detail could easily spruce em up.Snowstrider wrote: »HaldaAinur wrote: »I for one would like macho and pretty armor to appear. I don't mean boobs and butts huggers- just flattering, and decorated armor, for both sexes.
The armor we currently have is flattering, but sometimes we want something a little more grandoise, a little more flashy. Add a few flower patterns, spiky armor and such. I can think of plenty of ways to make girly heavy armor- ornate patterning/carvings in the metal, belts with more elegant designs, jewlerry you can actually see, nymph and tribal style costumes. Why not sell pattern/skin packs that you can apply to armor the same way you do dyes? Something as small as that can completely change a look. I like how so many people in this thread immediately assumed OP was demanding cleavage windows and lingerie...
I agree,I mean the armor in the game isnt detailed or unique at all wish we could have something with all kinds of accessoaries in them,More detailed armors like in the cinematic trailers
I really would love to see textures and patterns added in though, either bought at the crown store, or unlocked with more achievements. Say a 'battered texture' for your armors if you get defeated several times, a 'polished shine' if you go so long without getting killed. People love collecting dyes, and this could be expanded into not just extra detailing but unique visible accessories
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »I would like to point out one thing here. Armour isn't masculine or feminine. It servers a function and looks the way it does to suit that purpose.
I hate to use real world examples but would you ware a skimpy heat *** suit to go study a volcano? Or a slimy hazmat suit in a plague outbreak?
What function do the robes in this game serve in relation to your example?
And why can't they be more feminine and serve the exact same purpose? : o
Armour hinders magic so you ware cloth. come on that's fantasy RPG 101.
Armour isn't a fashion statement it's a tool. You don't go looking for the prettiest looking hammer or screwdriver, you choose the one that serves its purpose.
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »I would like to point out one thing here. Armour isn't masculine or feminine. It servers a function and looks the way it does to suit that purpose.
I hate to use real world examples but would you ware a skimpy heat *** suit to go study a volcano? Or a slimy hazmat suit in a plague outbreak?
What function do the robes in this game serve in relation to your example?
And why can't they be more feminine and serve the exact same purpose? : o
Armour hinders magic so you ware cloth. come on that's fantasy RPG 101.
Armour isn't a fashion statement it's a tool. You don't go looking for the prettiest looking hammer or screwdriver, you choose the one that serves its purpose.
Exactly how does having a more feminine cloth outfit hinder you from practicing magic MORE than long bulky robes...?
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »I would like to point out one thing here. Armour isn't masculine or feminine. It servers a function and looks the way it does to suit that purpose.
I hate to use real world examples but would you ware a skimpy heat *** suit to go study a volcano? Or a slimy hazmat suit in a plague outbreak?
What function do the robes in this game serve in relation to your example?
And why can't they be more feminine and serve the exact same purpose? : o
Armour hinders magic so you ware cloth. come on that's fantasy RPG 101.
Armour isn't a fashion statement it's a tool. You don't go looking for the prettiest looking hammer or screwdriver, you choose the one that serves its purpose.
Exactly how does having a more feminine cloth outfit hinder you from practicing magic MORE than long bulky robes...?
Since when has cloth been considered armour?
ChuckyPayne wrote: »As women in general, love to dress up. They like the beautiful feminine clothes. This is same in the game.
Argonian Cloth Lvl1 armor or the Dark Seducer costume is feminine armor..
IMO the key to remember is there is a contextual difference between a high fantasy setting, and a hand down the pants fantasy.
Have you even SEEN Nocturnal's Robes?
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »I would like to point out one thing here. Armour isn't masculine or feminine. It servers a function and looks the way it does to suit that purpose.
I hate to use real world examples but would you ware a skimpy heat *** suit to go study a volcano? Or a slimy hazmat suit in a plague outbreak?
What function do the robes in this game serve in relation to your example?
And why can't they be more feminine and serve the exact same purpose? : o
Armour hinders magic so you ware cloth. come on that's fantasy RPG 101.
Armour isn't a fashion statement it's a tool. You don't go looking for the prettiest looking hammer or screwdriver, you choose the one that serves its purpose.
Exactly how does having a more feminine cloth outfit hinder you from practicing magic MORE than long bulky robes...?
Since when has cloth been considered armour?ChuckyPayne wrote: »As women in general, love to dress up. They like the beautiful feminine clothes. This is same in the game.
Argonian Cloth Lvl1 armor or the Dark Seducer costume is feminine armor..
This thread isn't about traditional armour, I don't think. The OP is talking about all of the "armors", which include light and medium.
At least, that's how I take it seeing as how he considers Argonian Cloth Lvl 1 as armor in the very first post.
Have you even SEEN Nocturnal's Robes?
How does a daedric prince wearing a skimpy dress equate to players/the people of tamriel wearing skimpy armour? Skimpy CLOTHING, yes, it makes sense. Especially in warmer areas or in less...reputable areas *cough Ebon Flask cough* But armour? No.
I'd like to see something along those lines... nocturnals looks like something you'd expect for a costume or stealable clothing, and a light "fur" armor crafting style, or medium "ancient nord - nedic" styles would fit well I suppose. (come to think of it, those two could be the same style... one for light, one for medium...)ChuckyPayne wrote: »Skyrim fur armor:
http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/File:Fur_1_woman.jpg
Ancient nord:
http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Aela_the_Huntress
Skyrim Nocturnal's Clothes
http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Nocturnal's_Clothes
ROTFLliammozzb16_ESO wrote: »The show wasn't cancelled she was perma banned for exploiting.
Rune_Relic wrote: »Have you even SEEN Nocturnal's Robes?
How does a daedric prince wearing a skimpy dress equate to players/the people of tamriel wearing skimpy armour? Skimpy CLOTHING, yes, it makes sense. Especially in warmer areas or in less...reputable areas *cough Ebon Flask cough* But armour? No.
But it does beg the question of heavy armour in the alik'r desert.
I mean if we are talking practical clothing....you'd be a cooked turkey ready for stuffing after 5 minutes.
Have you even SEEN Nocturnal's Robes?
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »Do what you want with cloth, but leather and plate serves a purpose and should reflect that.
HaldaAinur wrote: »Yeah, I always find myself a little put down when the necklaces and rings aren't visible. A bone or even flower necklace would be nice, same goes for belts and gloves. The gloves can look well rather plain, and just having some extra detail could easily spruce em up.Snowstrider wrote: »HaldaAinur wrote: »I for one would like macho and pretty armor to appear. I don't mean boobs and butts huggers- just flattering, and decorated armor, for both sexes.
The armor we currently have is flattering, but sometimes we want something a little more grandoise, a little more flashy. Add a few flower patterns, spiky armor and such. I can think of plenty of ways to make girly heavy armor- ornate patterning/carvings in the metal, belts with more elegant designs, jewlerry you can actually see, nymph and tribal style costumes. Why not sell pattern/skin packs that you can apply to armor the same way you do dyes? Something as small as that can completely change a look. I like how so many people in this thread immediately assumed OP was demanding cleavage windows and lingerie...
I agree,I mean the armor in the game isnt detailed or unique at all wish we could have something with all kinds of accessoaries in them,More detailed armors like in the cinematic trailers
I really would love to see textures and patterns added in though, either bought at the crown store, or unlocked with more achievements. Say a 'battered texture' for your armors if you get defeated several times, a 'polished shine' if you go so long without getting killed. People love collecting dyes, and this could be expanded into not just extra detailing but unique visible accessories
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »HaldaAinur wrote: »Yeah, I always find myself a little put down when the necklaces and rings aren't visible. A bone or even flower necklace would be nice, same goes for belts and gloves. The gloves can look well rather plain, and just having some extra detail could easily spruce em up.Snowstrider wrote: »HaldaAinur wrote: »I for one would like macho and pretty armor to appear. I don't mean boobs and butts huggers- just flattering, and decorated armor, for both sexes.
The armor we currently have is flattering, but sometimes we want something a little more grandoise, a little more flashy. Add a few flower patterns, spiky armor and such. I can think of plenty of ways to make girly heavy armor- ornate patterning/carvings in the metal, belts with more elegant designs, jewlerry you can actually see, nymph and tribal style costumes. Why not sell pattern/skin packs that you can apply to armor the same way you do dyes? Something as small as that can completely change a look. I like how so many people in this thread immediately assumed OP was demanding cleavage windows and lingerie...
I agree,I mean the armor in the game isnt detailed or unique at all wish we could have something with all kinds of accessoaries in them,More detailed armors like in the cinematic trailers
I really would love to see textures and patterns added in though, either bought at the crown store, or unlocked with more achievements. Say a 'battered texture' for your armors if you get defeated several times, a 'polished shine' if you go so long without getting killed. People love collecting dyes, and this could be expanded into not just extra detailing but unique visible accessories
That's one thing I have noticed the art style in realistic looking MMO's always tends to look bland when it comes to armour. Where as more cartoonie MMO's like WoW have some amazing armour sets.
blackevil86 wrote: »[liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »Do what you want with cloth, but leather and plate serves a purpose and should reflect that.
And what purpose is that? Oh u mean the fictional protection they give? Everything in a game is fiction. Even gear. U can make a bikini have 200% more protection than a full heavy set on a whim, just for the lulz... And who are you to judge me if i go around like that for my own personal pleasure doing the same stuff u do in your HA?
There would be a difference if the fiction was closer to reality, but be honest to yourselves, wearing cloth irl u die from 1 hit on the head with a resto staff. In game, cloth is just like heavy armour just weaker. Its like having layered gear. Heavy armour has lets say 10 layers of protection, while cloth only has 3. but it has protection, contrary to reality, where it does not.
Stop looking for realism in fiction. Or i will start implying that Smaug is not even close to what a dragon is supposed to be. xD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smaug
Psychobunni wrote: »ViciousWayz wrote: »Also, I get why some people want their "immersion"... but this is an MMO, not single player. If it were, then we'd each be the only hero running around. There is nothing wrong with giving people options. We have to see everyone's pets, fugly characters half the time, men in bridal gowns now, skeletons, goblins, now draug, etc...all who are "barely" protected...yet their gear underneath those disguises is what protects them. You can justify this from a number of different angles, there's no good argument against it.
I would have no objection if the OP said feminine "costumes" such as the brides dress, skeletons, goblins......however he said armor. The armor is fine. If someone wants to look like a garden utensil , make em buy it in the crown store as a skin
Yes it is fiction but you still have to apply realism to it. Look at Dragon age, it's fantasy (elves, dwarves, demons, dragons magic, the whole shabang) and they do armour pretty legit and even reference to "boob plate" and how stupid it is (even in their fantasy setting) with the quote posted earlier between iron Bull and Cassandra.
If we just go - "Well it's fiction/fantasy, you can't app;y realism" Where do you draw the line? I want my character to jump as high as a mountain! Gravity? Pft stop trying to apply realism into my fantasy!
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »someone always uses this argument to justify themselves, look we all get that it's a game, what we're saying is we like the more realistic design choices they've made and would prefer they stay that was as opposed to having everyone run around dressed up like they were "actors" in "The lord of the Bangs: Fellowship of the bang"you can feel free to disagree with those of us that like things as is, and we'll continue to disagree with you.
blackevil86 wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »someone always uses this argument to justify themselves, look we all get that it's a game, what we're saying is we like the more realistic design choices they've made and would prefer they stay that was as opposed to having everyone run around dressed up like they were "actors" in "The lord of the Bangs: Fellowship of the bang"you can feel free to disagree with those of us that like things as is, and we'll continue to disagree with you.
Isn't CHOICE part of the realism u seek? Oh, so u never see boobs hanging out irl? Or a dude that want to show off his fake muscles?
Freedom of choice m8...
liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »Emma_Eunjung wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »If they go around dressed like xena then they should have their armour value cut down to 1/4 to reflect their choice of armour.
We already did... it's called Light Armor.
You never watched xena did you.
She wore medium armour that consisted of a leather bra and skirt. It had 0 value as armour.
blackevil86 wrote: »Yes it is fiction but you still have to apply realism to it. Look at Dragon age, it's fantasy (elves, dwarves, demons, dragons magic, the whole shabang) and they do armour pretty legit and even reference to "boob plate" and how stupid it is (even in their fantasy setting) with the quote posted earlier between iron Bull and Cassandra.
If we just go - "Well it's fiction/fantasy, you can't app;y realism" Where do you draw the line? I want my character to jump as high as a mountain! Gravity? Pft stop trying to apply realism into my fantasy!
there is no physics in ESO therefore there is no gravity. Its just a constant check for ground collision and in case there is none, the "body" will be moved down until collision is reached. Where is the realism in that? It is fictionally represented to emulate reality, but no physical laws apply. Basically its just like PACMAN with z-axis. And now try to say there is realism in PACMAN...
blackevil86 wrote: »liammozzb16_ESO wrote: »someone always uses this argument to justify themselves, look we all get that it's a game, what we're saying is we like the more realistic design choices they've made and would prefer they stay that was as opposed to having everyone run around dressed up like they were "actors" in "The lord of the Bangs: Fellowship of the bang"you can feel free to disagree with those of us that like things as is, and we'll continue to disagree with you.
Isn't CHOICE part of the realism u seek? Oh, so u never see boobs hanging out irl? Or a dude that want to show off his fake muscles?
Freedom of choice m8...
uhm, i don't know where this whole choice thing came from, unless you are referenceing design choices by the dev team....in which case i think you need to work on your reading comprehension. But go online and see if you can find a bullet proof vest with a boob window, i haven't looked but i'll bet you can't find one, it's not funtional that way, you wouldn't find it in anything beyond ceremonial non functional armors either, and thats the setting the devs created, and i for one like it.