spartaxoxo wrote: »

No. It should be balanced and not removed.

so your ok with half made systems being put into the game because SUBCLASSING should have been BALANCED before being released not after , and now the players are looking at 3-4 YEARS of class change in the name of BALANCING SUBCLASSING something the development team SHOULD ALREADY OF DONE BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE SYSTEM

Geez, why don't they just make beam more costly to use.

When populated, IC has the best PvP the game has to offer.

The problem is it's never populated. ZOS killed IC when they made it so that you could only spawn in districts that your alliance owned. It made it so that as soon as one side of a fight got the upper hand or a good grouo kill, the fight ends instead of allowing for reinforcements to come back in.

PvP is further hindered with the cheesy method of instantly avoiding fights by queueing into Cyrodiil as soon as people think they can't win a fight, completely invalidating the entire risk vs reward of the zone.

ZOS fixing both of these issues would go a long way towards bringing back big sustained fights in IC.

xylena wrote: »

edward_frigidhands wrote: »

[snip]

Vengeance has not been born yet. GH players are desperately trying to prevent its birth. Why do you think that is? If Vengeance was no threat to GH, these threads wouldn't exist.

I'm not sure why Vengeance needs a solid year of "testing" but once live, which PvP mode will the noobs stick with? The accessible one, or the one with ball groups, procs, and instakills? Nobody outside GH forum posters is gonna put up with that crap just to tinker with bad sets.

Vengeance was born and forgotten the second GH was allowed to run along side it. You said it will continue to grow in population but it has only gone down since it's inception. No company would ever look at a graph of a vastly declining population and say it has yet to take off.

You also stated GH won't grow but it hits pop cap every single day. If the devs increased the limit it would even further outshine vengeance but they allocate their resources to come up with a replacement for GH rather than just improving it. Obviously the lag is the issue and that's why they don't want even more players going to GH, but ques can hit over 100 people on some nights while vengeance can't break a 1 bar population for more than 20 minutes.
[edited to remove quote]

ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »

Destai wrote: »

SilverBride wrote: »

Their avatars say MOD or DEV across them but having different colors would distinguish them more. But a list of all the staff that post along with a description of what they do would be very helpful.

They do, yes, but there's another area that could use some differentiation, as shown in the screenshot above. I would like this ZOS Icon to be reserved for non-moderator comments only. I'm clicking on it because I'm looking for actual commentary from ZOS. @ZOS_Kevin or @ZOS_JessicaFolsom is this something you could look into?

But yes, a list of who does what would be helpful.

Yep, this is something we can work on as a pinned post in January. Thanks for the suggestion!

Thanks, I appreciate it. Will you also be looking into changing the moderation iconography as outlined in my screenshot? Would really appreciate the ZOS icon being reserved for CM and dev comments only. Maybe give Mods a different icon, if it's possible.

Subclassing has made builds more homogeneous. This along with Account wide achievements has diluted the value of having alternate toons and running through the story with those.

As one who likes to quest and explore, the reduction of PvE content over the last few years.

Microsoft ownership, layoffs (should've kept the developers and kicked out the marketing team) and the push for AI.

ESO has begin to feel like a Crown Store with a game attached.

Yes, they are a pain, however they have the cutest butt wiggle. I just like riding behind them, it makes me laugh!