BisDasBlutGefriert wrote: »It's just a video of a guy hovering way above some wayshrines literally shooting missiles down at the players below in a relentless bombardment. Which explode like mortars when they hit the ground killing whoever is caught in them.
People around the wayshrines try firing magic and arrows back at the guy, but they seem to hit short every time.
In zone chat, he's talking about zos's Customer service. And that's pretty much the extent of both videos.
Like he's trying to prove a point on how the Customer service here is almost non-existent.
I've had quite a few posts removed and some lovely emails sent to me, but all of my support tickets have been resolved within 48hrs. 🤷🏼♂️
furiouslog wrote: »I think the issue motivating these actions is that bots and scripts that use exploits in the game used for cheating go unaddressed for long periods of time and are not publicly acknowledged - we can submit tickets for cheating, botting, etc, but the amount of time it takes to fill those holes is probably not acceptable to this person. Or maybe they had a crown store problem, or a billing problem, or they are just sick of poor game performance, and this is revenge intended to embarrass ZOS.
Whoever authored this exploit took the time to fill out some amusing graphical detail and a user-friendly interface. Quality product, honestly.
I’ve had numerous instances of chests and resources being used by someone else when there’s no one around. I know it’s relatively trivial but I don’t understand it so I wondered if it was connected?
If you've played on Pc Eu you probably heard about the guy who's casually taking down players in cities with rapid firing missiles on them while flying through the sky, who's randomly referring to a current post on the forums about customer support.
Here's some videos that show him cheating, they weren't done by me so I take no credit for them
[snip]
@ZOS_GinaBruno you might want to look at this
[Edited to remove Naming and Shaming]
To do it openly and blatantly like that is either to get attention for themselves or to bring attention to the existence of such things in the game. Imagine the shenanigans people get up to when they try to keep things hidden.
If you read zone chat, it was more of a statement about ZOS and cheating, I guess.
ZOS will ban the guy in the video, probably give a strike to the OP, and call it a day. Beer o' clock!
(not necessarily in that order)
TequilaFire wrote: »I know it is wrong, but blowing up Vulkhel Guard would be so much fun!
This isn't a simple cheat, script or bot, this "hacker" circumvented ZoS code which is crap in the first place.
In order for the game not to be hacked again ZoS would have to reencode the whole game code. Am I the only one that sees this?
SeaGtGruff wrote: »I haven't seen the video, but back when there was talk about a "flying cheat" being used to harass RP groups, the person who did it claimed it wasn't a cheat.
Then there was the video of the guy who found a way to go offmap in Western Skyrim, found a duplicate of Solitude, and was up on top of a wall shooting down at people.
I'm wondering if this might be something similar-- find a way to go offmap, find a path that lets you walk out above a town on an "invisible walkway," and shoot down at people?
Even if that's something that can be done within the game without using a hack, IMO it would still qualify as an exploit.
Plus, there's the question of how this person was able to use an attack associated with a trial or dungeon boss.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »I haven't seen the video, but back when there was talk about a "flying cheat" being used to harass RP groups, the person who did it claimed it wasn't a cheat.
Then there was the video of the guy who found a way to go offmap in Western Skyrim, found a duplicate of Solitude, and was up on top of a wall shooting down at people.
I'm wondering if this might be something similar-- find a way to go offmap, find a path that lets you walk out above a town on an "invisible walkway," and shoot down at people?
Even if that's something that can be done within the game without using a hack, IMO it would still qualify as an exploit.
Plus, there's the question of how this person was able to use an attack associated with a trial or dungeon boss.
No this guy was using an attack ability that only one Trial boss has access to. Most definitely a cheat.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »SeaGtGruff wrote: »I haven't seen the video, but back when there was talk about a "flying cheat" being used to harass RP groups, the person who did it claimed it wasn't a cheat.
Then there was the video of the guy who found a way to go offmap in Western Skyrim, found a duplicate of Solitude, and was up on top of a wall shooting down at people.
I'm wondering if this might be something similar-- find a way to go offmap, find a path that lets you walk out above a town on an "invisible walkway," and shoot down at people?
Even if that's something that can be done within the game without using a hack, IMO it would still qualify as an exploit.
Plus, there's the question of how this person was able to use an attack associated with a trial or dungeon boss.
No this guy was using an attack ability that only one Trial boss has access to. Most definitely a cheat.
And hence the last line of my post, which I had thought clearly implied that some kind of cheat or hack must have been used for that part at least. I guess that wasn't clear, so I'm clarifying now.
Also, I've now seen the video, which presumably shows an overlay from the cheat program on the guy's screen.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »Are you sure about that? The video I saw looked like it was at least partly from the attacker's view, and the way it consisted of several short scenes cut together made it look like a product advertisement, not to mention that the UI that I was referring to appeared to have a name that was unflattering of ZOS, and the option fields looked like they might be referring to hacks.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »Are you sure about that? The video I saw looked like it was at least partly from the attacker's view, and the way it consisted of several short scenes cut together made it look like a product advertisement, not to mention that the UI that I was referring to appeared to have a name that was unflattering of ZOS, and the option fields looked like they might be referring to hacks.
gatekeeper13 wrote: »To do it openly and blatantly like that is either to get attention for themselves or to bring attention to the existence of such things in the game.
Any player who at least once stepped into pvp knows this game has cheaters.
But when you try to drag an attention to this issue, there is a swarm of tryharders messaging you "nono youy are just anoob, , you don't know mechanics, l2p git gut kek".
Later you link them a video with a guy walljumping Cyrodill keep and killing people out of invisibility unable to be caught yet get response "sorry its 2019 year give fresh proof or gtfo".
And look, here is a 1 day old video of a guy blantantly winpocket editing trial bosses abilities.
The fact we have a proof is just because this guy is willingly doing so to be recorded.
But answeer the question to yourself - if this game allows player to fly around and shoot boss spells, how many hidden cheaters there around who are using 3d party software not so blantantly ? For passives ? For small but cruical boosts ? For range checks ? For teleports ? Gold gains ?
Nothing here is funny or hilarious, this is plain sad.
That just goes to show how "effective" the server-side sanity checks are. Assuming that there are any...SeaGtGruff wrote: »I haven't seen the video, but back when there was talk about a "flying cheat" being used to harass RP groups, the person who did it claimed it wasn't a cheat.
Then there was the video of the guy who found a way to go offmap in Western Skyrim, found a duplicate of Solitude, and was up on top of a wall shooting down at people.
I'm wondering if this might be something similar-- find a way to go offmap, find a path that lets you walk out above a town on an "invisible walkway," and shoot down at people?
Even if that's something that can be done within the game without using a hack, IMO it would still qualify as an exploit.
Plus, there's the question of how this person was able to use an attack associated with a trial or dungeon boss.
No this guy was using an attack ability that only one Trial boss has access to. Most definitely a cheat.
That just goes to show how "effective" the server-side sanity checks are. Assuming that there are any...SeaGtGruff wrote: »I haven't seen the video, but back when there was talk about a "flying cheat" being used to harass RP groups, the person who did it claimed it wasn't a cheat.
Then there was the video of the guy who found a way to go offmap in Western Skyrim, found a duplicate of Solitude, and was up on top of a wall shooting down at people.
I'm wondering if this might be something similar-- find a way to go offmap, find a path that lets you walk out above a town on an "invisible walkway," and shoot down at people?
Even if that's something that can be done within the game without using a hack, IMO it would still qualify as an exploit.
Plus, there's the question of how this person was able to use an attack associated with a trial or dungeon boss.
No this guy was using an attack ability that only one Trial boss has access to. Most definitely a cheat.
Earlier this year there was the vSO poison incident in Craglorn. Which was probably also the result of similar cheating, but at least in that case it could be potentially explained by a bug in the game causing the effect to remain on a player who has left the trial (abruptly disconnected, for example).
However, in this case there can be exactly 0 doubt - the hacker was obviously using a boss ability never meant to be accessible to player characters.
And FWIW, all it would have taken to stop that kind of cheating dead in its tracks would be to give each ability a flag like "bIsUsableByPlayers" and enforce a server-side check on that.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »Are you sure about that? The video I saw looked like it was at least partly from the attacker's view, and the way it consisted of several short scenes cut together made it look like a product advertisement, not to mention that the UI that I was referring to appeared to have a name that was unflattering of ZOS, and the option fields looked like they might be referring to hacks.
Sounds like we saw different videos.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »Are you sure about that? The video I saw looked like it was at least partly from the attacker's view, and the way it consisted of several short scenes cut together made it look like a product advertisement, not to mention that the UI that I was referring to appeared to have a name that was unflattering of ZOS, and the option fields looked like they might be referring to hacks.
I have not seen that one. The one I saw at the top of this thread and was from a player/observer perspective.