Go watch ezareth kill shiliza the 'unkillable' dk. It actually looks pretty easy.
pkb16_ESO2 wrote: »Temp is dead...
chongguang wrote: »After observing this thread since its post and making some discussion with players from other forums. I can give a short summary to the theme with less bias as I can.
First of all, PVP content can be divided into 4 parts or 4 purposes
1. Dueling
2. group pvp (both include large and small here)
3. roaming/soloing
4. getting score
For Dueling, all 4 classes are balanced , the key points are building in using and skills of players. Thereby all the 4 class get 1 score or I can say they are all have 0 score at all.
Then sorcerers can fit for the rest of 3 parts, while other 3 may not have this ability. Eg, DK is not good at roaming/ soloing as they lack of escape abilities
chongguang wrote: »After observing this thread since its post and making some discussion with players from other forums. I can give a short summary to the theme with less bias as I can.
First of all, PVP content can be divided into 4 parts or 4 purposes
1. Dueling
2. group pvp (both include large and small here)
3. roaming/soloing
4. getting score
For Dueling, all 4 classes are balanced , the key points are building in using and skills of players. Thereby all the 4 class get 1 score or I can say they are all have 0 score at all.
Then sorcerers can fit for the rest of 3 parts, while other 3 may not have this ability. Eg, DK is not good at roaming/ soloing as they lack of escape abilities
Dueling : Tie (very rock paper scissors at the moment)
Group pvp: DK (amazing group synergies and can hold ground)
Roaming : Sorcs tie with NBs
Getting Score: DK (can dish out aoes, hold ground, and tank)
SafiyerAmitora wrote: »
chongguang wrote: »chongguang wrote: »After observing this thread since its post and making some discussion with players from other forums. I can give a short summary to the theme with less bias as I can.
First of all, PVP content can be divided into 4 parts or 4 purposes
1. Dueling
2. group pvp (both include large and small here)
3. roaming/soloing
4. getting score
For Dueling, all 4 classes are balanced , the key points are building in using and skills of players. Thereby all the 4 class get 1 score or I can say they are all have 0 score at all.
Then sorcerers can fit for the rest of 3 parts, while other 3 may not have this ability. Eg, DK is not good at roaming/ soloing as they lack of escape abilities
Dueling : Tie (very rock paper scissors at the moment)
Group pvp: DK (amazing group synergies and can hold ground)
Roaming : Sorcs tie with NBs
Getting Score: DK (can dish out aoes, hold ground, and tank)
Dueling: Tie (agree, completely !)
GP : DK, but I think sorcerers are also good at this
Roaming: agreed, completely again
Getting Score: eh....my friend told me that Templar is the easiest one for this, as they can just use 1 button healer skill in group to get score without question
SafiyerAmitora wrote: »
Blabafat is great at it. For the stam version, I thing ebonheart templar or whatever his name is, is pretty good.
SafiyerAmitora wrote: »
Blabafat is great at it. For the stam version, I thing ebonheart templar or whatever his name is, is pretty good.
pkb16_ESO2 wrote: »SafiyerAmitora wrote: »
Blabafat is great at it. For the stam version, I thing ebonheart templar or whatever his name is, is pretty good.
I know the vids, but you have to see that blabafat is very skilled, he plays impirial and he bursts the guy in the vids with hte combo meteor+ detonation+jabs. Its quite easy to counter for skilled players and i dont know if he would do that good in duells with it.
@blabafat maybe a comment from you would be nice.
the vids from Legend (ebonheart templar) arent that good. To kill some low lvl and bad players... i make same *** daily but it doesnt prove a templar is in good spot.
All in all the poll speaks for itself and good player knew it, templar are bad at moment as offensive Pvp Players and their issues are well known.
I still like to play it (im also impirial and im still doing good) but if i see what my NB can do and my lowy DK... i realize temps are weak...
[...]pkb16_ESO2 wrote: »SafiyerAmitora wrote: »
Blabafat is great at it. For the stam version, I thing ebonheart templar or whatever his name is, is pretty good.
I know the vids, but you have to see that blabafat is very skilled, he plays impirial and he bursts the guy in the vids with hte combo meteor+ detonation+jabs. Its quite easy to counter for skilled players and i dont know if he would do that good in duells with it.
@blabafat maybe a comment from you would be nice.
the vids from Legend (ebonheart templar) arent that good. To kill some low lvl and bad players... i make same *** daily but it doesnt prove a templar is in good spot.
All in all the poll speaks for itself and good player knew it, templar are bad at moment as offensive Pvp Players and their issues are well known.
I still like to play it (im also impirial and im still doing good) but if i see what my NB can do and my lowy DK... i realize temps are weak...
Could go on and on about it but I am sure there are still some idiots out there whining about Jesus Beam even though there are non-executes that can hit as hard in less time even when not in execute range and are not channeled.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »It's amazing that NB and Templars are fairly neck and neck for the weakest class and DKs snd sorcs seem fairly close to being the strongest, according to the player base. There is a huge gap. What does this tell you @zos? Maybe Your balance is way out of wack?
i dont pvp in this game because its a joke, but if it were guild wars 2 i'd say 2h warrior
And the only class that you can kill is NPC.I dunno, guys. I'm a DK Tank build in PvP and the only classes that can kill me are Fear-*** nightblades and Sorcs (the ones that aren't silly enough to use frags on me). So, I'd say that sorcs are probably the biggest competitor to the DKs here (Nightblades are just annoyances, really, IME).
Really, though, it all depends on the scenario and the build, but it's definitely between Sorc and DK. I don't honestly have enough experience with Sorcs to say if they're all that great, but from what I've seen... they have shields, but their DPS is pretty ***. They'll sustain a fight for dayz, though.
twistedmonk wrote: »This is what I've seen in PvP.
Stamina NB - 2hander/bow - is the currently strongest class in PvP. Basically you just need 3 main skills - crit charge/wrecking blow/rally and dodge roll a lot.
current pvp populations are from most played to least played are : NB, Sorc, Templar, DK.
Go watch ezareth kill shiliza the 'unkillable' dk. It actually looks pretty easy.
LegendaryMage wrote: »The opponents that always gave me the toughest fights were good NBs, not even counting BoL sorcs except a few very good ones, but those are rare. I love fighting them (NBs) but they are obviously balanced for 1v1 the most in my opinion.
Yes, sorcerers are strong and can do some cool things in 1v1 if played right, but no, they can't slice you up as quickly as NBs from what I've seen. If I was a NB in 1v1 with a sorc, I would try to get him out of shields without CCing him (step1) and then fear + burst with ulty, it's gg for sure every single time.
@Soulac Yeah, I'm talking about you too imba cat. You need a nerf ASAP.
twistedmonk wrote: »This is what I've seen in PvP.
Stamina NB - 2hander/bow - is the currently strongest class in PvP. Basically you just need 3 main skills - crit charge/wrecking blow/rally and dodge roll a lot.
current pvp populations are from most played to least played are : NB, Sorc, Templar, DK.