posthumecaver wrote: »mybuild
So can anybody tell me do I have to change my build completely or it is still going to be viable?
@posthumecaver , as far as I understand your build (which is very similar to mine) is no longer going to be viable in 1.6. Particularly, if you are depending on Critical Surge for self-healing (like pretty much every Sorcerer out there) you will be greatly disappointed by the way it has been nerfed. Crushing Shock has also been nerfed. I think we will probably need to re-learn how to play the game.
xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »They're not using it because they have better damage options. When it was double hitting for 600+ damage a pop every sorc I came across was using that ability. i still see some people running the build with it but they've mostly swapped to higher damage builds. Anyway a massive Heal that cost no mana and you can spam virtually forever is in no way a million times inferior to GDB because someones keyboard keys get stuck.
Yet you come here again and again telling ppl you know better about a class you don´t play. Nothing constructive is coming from you.
xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »kelly.medleyb14_ESO wrote: »Hello,
I know there are allready many threads about sorcerers in the forums and I read almost all, but I think many of them ignore facts or don't make good comparisons or dont make realistic suggestions. First of all I will make clear that this post is about PVE balance, the sorcs in PVP are fine if you know how to play them. I played a sorc since the beta, I'm playing some pvp (rank 19) in organised groups or solo and do a lot of dungeons and raids (AA and HR hardmode clear, SO clear). Some of the arguments are similar to other threads and I wont quote them all, just see this here as a summary with some additional feedback.
The big questions is what ZOS wants the Sorcerer to be? What roles should it fill out? @ZOS_GinaBruno can you answer this?
In my opinion there is a good space for the sorcere as a ranged magicka caster, supporting the group with magicka and providing magicka based debuffs like spellpenetration. And if you take a close look at it we aren't so far away as you will see in the suggestions section.
This text will be longer so i will make some structure using the spoiler function. Just click on the headlines you are interested in.
Situation in 1.5 compared to 1.6.3 concerning raid and dungeon groupsSituation in 1.5Survivability compared to other classes
Tank: Dragonknight (DK) > Templar (T) > Nightblade (NB) >= Sorcerer (S)
Healer: T >> S > NB >= DK
DPS: DK > NB > S > T
Does this look like "play what you want and play how you want"?
While DKs and Temps have at least one role where they are way better than other classes, NB and specially sorcs had no role where they are the best, but NBs are still able to deal 1.300 DPS while a sorc can hardly get up to 1.000-1.100 DPS. This is reflected in the trial leaderbords: The fastest teams dont even have one single sorc. The sorcs are completely underrepresented as shown in this thread: Magicka Sorcerers and end-game PvE
And this is why: Sorcs dont deal enough dmg and they are only used as heal support and negate monkey. Thanks to surge they had the highest weapon damage in 1.5 so there healing done with the restoration staff was extremely good. The negate was usefull in many situations when you face a lot of magic aoe dmg.
What will change with 1.6?
Restoration staff abilities scale of spelldmg, the spelldmg buff is available for every class (Mages guild -> Entropy). Since the mage doesnt have healing abilites the expert mage passive wont give him a huge bonus while healing (example: you only do aoe heals with healing springs, you will need magelight, -> 8% more spelldmg -> about 4% more healing done). Compared to DKs or NBs who have some nice synergies while healing (syphoning abilities, DKs dmg shield) sorcs wont be the 2nd best healers anymore.
Changes to negate magic:
It only negates magic effects when its casted, spell resistance removed (1.5 suppresion field), minor dmg reduction added (doesn't stack with the circle of protection (fighters guild)), spellpenetration added. Compared to other defensive ultimates that provide a 30% dmg reduction for the players (NB: vail of blades) or reduce the boss dmg (Templar: solar prison), the 8% are a joke and can be provided by a NON ultimate ability. The negate doesnt do any dmg itself while the vail or nova deal dmg, so the spellpenetration could be somehow equal to it but.
The absorption field is not a good option too since all the buffs can be obtained without ultimates (radiant aura (templar), potions, rapid manouver).
So what can a sorc do for the group in 1.6?
- exploitation passive giving 3% spellcrit to the group
- restoring twilight increasing the magicka recovery by 10% (if it survives and doesnt trigger boss mechanics like the chain lightning from the mage in AA)
- Attronach synergy increasing the dmg of one player by 25% for 8 sec every 60 sec (attronach cooldown)
- Less DPS then NBs and DKs
- Less survivability then all other classes (see below)
thats it. Compared to templars and nightblades with their defensive ultimates and support abilities there is no space for sorcs. Maybe for one with a twilight and any dark magic ability. But the dmg increase for the group DPS from the 3% crit will be equal to the loss of having one NB or DK dps less in group.I will make this one short and add some videos. The sorc doesn't have a good selfheal, only protection is the hardened ward and the thundering presence. So i made a video in spellscar against a whole buch of mobs on time with my vet14 sorcerer and one time with my vet14 templar. The gear used is pretty equal, both have 90 CPs spend so i can have the 12% crit passive from the apprentice and get some more surge heals. While my sorc has to use the negate magic in order to survive, i can easily do it on my templar without ultimate. My sorc reaches a higher aoe dps but gets significantly lower selfheal and hardly survives by using his full arsenal of defensive abilities (hardened ward, thundering presence, power surge, suppresion field). A templar needs two skills: Blazing shield, puncturing sweep.Suggestions and ability feedback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrLldWE5ugc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSEDX6igKWo
The my heals per second provided by surge where arround 1000 hps for the whole fight, while the templars pucturing sweep provides 2500 hps. If i had used the solar prison ultimate the templars dps would have been better than the sorcs.
Just to show the unbalance i made two more videos. One with my templar without ultimates and without CP spend. And one with pucturing sweep only to show how much HPS a templar can get while dealing dmg:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY7LOQxCR4U
Puncturing Sweep only
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wMkNr4Wv9I"
I could do this with every other class. The DKs have inhale, the NBs sap essence (the also heal the group) so even in terms of survivability sorcs are in the last place now.As i mentioned before the developer team is on a good way, but i would like to make some suggestions and give some detailed feedback on abilites.
Passives:
- Expert Mage:
I like the idea behind this change to give the sorcerer the chance to reach the highest spelldmg of all classes, so they are more powerful with destruction and restoration staffs then other classes. The problem is that these 2% arent enough since they compete agains the mages guild passive (2% max magicka, 2% magicka reg) per ability slottet. In terms of dmg the 2% more spelldmg are only better if your max magicka is lower than you spelldmg times 10 (max magicka < spelldmg*10). This will rarely happen, specially when you get more CPs. So this passive gives about 6% more spelldmg in most of the cases (since the sorc always needs a destruction staff ability). So it gives about 3% more dmg/healing. Nice to have but not world changing.
Rising it to 1%/3% would actually make it better than the mages guild passive.
I'm not complaining about the loss of the 10% magicka reduction, because magicka management becomes a lot easier with the CP system. At this point it only hurts stamina sorcs, which is kind of sad but as I mentioned I see the sorc as a magicka caster.
- Daedric Protection
This passive is pretty useless and could be replaced by a better one. The sorcerer has no ability or passive that supports its healing ability. Why not change Daedric Protection to:
"Increses the healing done by (3%/5%) while having a deadric summoning ability slotted"
This could bring the sorc in line with the other classes in terms of healing.
Active abilities:
- Negate Magic
the negate has to come on one lvl with the other defensive ultimates. Since it only negates magic effects on impact and not during the whole duration, which was extremely strong and maybe too strong. The absorption field is a pretty useless morph since the major buffs can be obtained by other non ultimate abilities (radiant aura, potions, rapid manouver).
For the suppresion field there is a simple solution:
Increase the dmg reduction to 30% (major buff) like the vail of blades and keep the spellpenetration buff and the rest.
- Cristal Fragments
I like the changes here with the extra dmg when it procs. The problem is that the sorcerer doesnt have an instant cast skill to spam in order to proc crystal fragments. The only option here is crushing shock / force shock. And it should proc on all skills including streak and encase.
Increasing the proc chance (maybe arround 50%) could be a way to bring the sorcs dps in line with other classes.
- Encase
The spell is fine, and i also like the morphs, but i would make one suggestion: Make it a groud target like lightning flood, with a circle area (6-8m radius). That would be really cool and give the sorcerer a ranged unique root and not a bad copy of the DKs talons.
- Lightning Flood
I really like the increased duration. Whoever says it doesnt hurt should do some maths. Even the 6 sec morph is an extremely good (aoe) DOT. The 10 sec morph is the best non ultimate DOT in the game, ticking every 0.5 sec with 800 dmg for 10 sec (15.000 dmg) on my vet 14 altmer sorc with 90 CP set. In combination with the valkyn skoria set this is awesome. Additionally it has 28m range and it provides a synergy.
But there are two downsides:
Placing it feels somehow unresponsive, since its a ground effect and the animation is pretty slow.
The radius is pretty small, so when the boss moves its hard to use.
- Bound Armor
Lets make it short. The minor armor buff is like nothing. Only the 8% magicka/stamina depending on the morph is worth slotting it, but does it have to be a toggle and waste 2 slots on my bar?
- Pets in general
The fact that they are toggles is a real problem, because they take too much space on both bars and you have almost no options when you try to play them effectively (magelight, deadric prey, empowering ward, entropy/surge, filler (cristal shards/force shock)). No Place for AOE or execute, so its no good build for most of the dungeons and trials. Additionally the pets take heals, that are aimed at players and trigger boss mechanics like the lightning chain in AA.
Im not a fan of pets in endgame content and the sorcerers should not have to depend on them to be able to compete in terms of dps.
- Surge
I have i huge problem with this ability and how it performs in 1.6. and here is why:
The unmorphed version gives weapon damage. That was fine before 1.6 because the sorcerer could buff the dmg of destruction staffs and the healing with the resto staffs like no other class. In 1.6 they scale with spelldmg, like all sorcerer abilities. So why doesnt the base version give spelldmg and only one morph give weapon dmg?
There is no need for a morph that gives spell and weapon dmg since hybrid builds cant compete with specialized builds since the removal of softcaps.
The biggest problem is the change to the healing it does. Every class has a spell that does dmg and heals the caster (T: Puncturing Sweep, DK: Inhale, NB: sap essence), and the healing is increased based on the enemies hit. The sorcerer used to have crit surge, that was working somehow similar. Now they implemented a cooldown for the heal, so even if you hit multiple targets you only get one heal every 0,25 sec. If you are unlucky there will be a dot criting and your high dmg ability (meteor, impulse) cant give you a heal thx to the cooldown. The other classes dont have this cooldown, why?
The videos above (under survivability) show the imbalance between the selfheals from sorcs and temps. I dont have a NB or DK but its enough to show that one class is able to do it. I dont want you to nerf all other classes. Just bring the sorcerer back on their lvl with a change like this:
Remove the cooldown of surge, limit the crit heals to 6 targets (puncturing sweep doesnt even have a limit, see video above) and adjust the heals with the % factor (used to be 65%, got reduced to 40% in 1.6). I agree when people say critsurge was too strong, but at the moment its not worth its slot on the bar.
- Surge vs. Entropy
Its not only the cooldown that made surge redundant, but the buff to entropy. Entropy provides the same spelldmg buff and also some heals, that can be higher than the surge heals when casted on multiple targets.
Additional Entropy effects:
- it deals dmg over time
- if morphed it gives 8% more max health in addition to the 2% magicka and 2% magicka reg from the mages guild passives
- the next spell deals 20% more dmg (if you have a cristal fragments proc thats almost 2k more dmg)
- it cost 1/3 of surge
So when it comes to single target dmg entropy will allways be superior. Without the cooldown removed surge wont be in any sorcerer build anymore. It used to be the most favorite ability of many sorcs and it used to be unique.
- Dark Exchange
As a channeled ability its absolutely useless in fights. In PVE you loose to much dps/healing when you cant cast for 4 seconds, in PVP its like praying to the eight (Edit: no offense here, Tiber Septim/Talos is born after ESO) just before you are dead.
If you want to make it useful make it a toggle, but you should be able to perform spells while its active. It will drain your stamina until its gone or you turn it of. This wont unbalance pvp since you are dead when you run out of stamina (no dodging blocking or CC break).
- Deadric Mines
This is the only ability that might be even worse then dark exchange. Its costs are extremely high, its not a ground target like the flame rune from the mages guild but a player cast. The cooldown against bosses makes it useless in terms of single target dps. I dont know if ppl use it against players but in most of the situations the flame rune will be dealing more dmg and it stuns (morph) instead of the immobilize.
Every other class got a new ability with 1.6. The sorcerer didnt get one, while there would be so many options and a real need for a unique instant cast ability that does moderate dmg. There are some ideas in the forums, but I want to share my own ones:
Replace Deadric Dines
Insert an ability like a dark magic ball, maybe a fire ball (dark fire ball) that
- has 28m range
- is instant castable
- deals a bit more dmg than force shock
- maybe a little aoe dmg like the curse when its a fire ball
Morphs:
- 1 morph that reduces the targets spellresistance (minor debuff)
- 1 morph that restores magicka over time to the group like the NB are able to heal the group a bit
An ability like this would solve several sorc problems: They could have an own "filler" for some rotations and dont rely on the destro staff/force shock anymore. We could provide some unique support to the group (magicka recovery, a debuff no one else provides).
You are the developers. Be creative and give us something we can play with and support the group. Give raidgroups a reason to take some sorcs with them.
Finally I want to say it took me a lot of time doing the tests and writing this down to provide some feedback. I would appreciate it if i could get a response from @ZOS_GinaBruno or anyone else at ZOS that this feedback is read and gets discussed.
Thanks everyone for reading
Edit (20.02.2015, 11:01 am CET)
First i want to thank all of you for your kind replys, specially for the additional feedback. I hope the discussion stays as constructive as it is at the moment. When i find the time i will update the first post here and sum up some of the ideas provided by the comments.- edited the passives section (expert mage was discussed two times in there)
- Edited some spelling
I want to keep the additional feedback seperate, so you see the new ideas from the comments and who suggested them.
Stamina Sorcerers would like to have some more options, maybe a Cristal Shards morph based on stamina or adding weapon dmg to the Expert Mage passive.
Some feedback was about Sorcs as healers (@Seraphyel, @Nihil, @Ramasee ). My suggestion was to change the Deadric Portection passive, but some of the comments came up with a better idea: Adding the minor meding buff to some skill like surge, bound armor or twilight matriarch (see below in detail).
Surge
- Remove the cooldown (argumentation see above). There is no reason atm to keep it since no similar ability has it.
- Add some sort of dmg buff (e.g. extra shock or elemental dmg) to make up for the high cost
or
- Add minor (or major) mending buff (8% or 30% more healing done), depending on what is balanced better. My feeling is that a major buff would be too strong.
Twilight Matriarch (Sommon Twilight morph)
- Remove the heal when player's health falls below 35%
- Add minor mending buff (8% more healing done) for the player
I really like this idea of having a pet that supports my healing power. The sorcerer could be able to provide sustained heals for a group while using the restoration staff.
Deadric Protection
Let it increase the healing done or make the health regen bonus a group bonus.
Deadric Mines
Some people (@pppontus, @Nihil) find this skill useful and wish some minor tweaks instead of removing it, giving the sorcerer a high dps melee range ability. The boss immunity could get changed, so that the 2nd and 3rd mine deal less dmg instead of 0 dmg.
Negate Magic
Add minor force buff to increase the crit dmg (@Nihil)
Edit (20.02.2015, 18:33 CET)After some more testing, specially the selfheal using the Clannfear I created a "tank" build. With more then 30k Magicka you get more magicka back than the Clannfear costs plus it heals you for 35%. To show the power of this combination I made a video (the fight starts at 50% and stays basically the same):
http://youtu.be/AlznkZJOFX0
I accidently stopped the recoding to early, so here is the gear and setup:
http://youtu.be/OtwqwYBBa0U
I don't like this mechanic, it feels like an exploid to have a 35% selfheal basically for free (you even get a little more magicka back than you spend). I dont want this to be ingame, its not balanced at all. Sorcs need some kind of selfheal, but to have a free selfheal is too much. We are not that bad.
My suggestion to solve this problem: Change rabate passive so that it only gives magicka back when the Clannfear dies, not when you call him back. So you would have to pay 4.5k-6.5k magicka for a 35% heal. That should be somehow balanced compared to the DKs dragonblood or the Templars Breath of Life.
I had to stop and reply when you claimed Sorcs are bad dps in pve. We are the best. It's about burst and aoe dps most of the time and that's what sorcs to best, not to mention we are hands down the best in AvA.
You can stop now. They've already removed the LOL option from the forums
We are not the best in Pve. Over 4 minute intervals, my DK can out dps my sorc in aoe by over 35‰ and out single target (with dots and if my sorc does not use pets) by more than 15%.
As for pvp, I cannot depend on more than half my dps skills because of reflects and absorbs.
Ok, I can understand reflects...if you're like one of the two sorcs who isn't running 1hd/shield.....but absorbs? you talking Absorb Shields or the 1hd/shield Absorb?
I guess he is talking about the bolt escape morph that absorbs spell projectiles for 4 seconds. Reflects are also a problem for sorcs running a destro staff and crushing shock.
I would like to end the discussion about PVP at this point. Sorcs in PVP are fine and have some good options to counter most of the builds. You should never forget that there is no perfect build for PVP that counters every class and build.
The sorcs main problem is the bad survivabilty and lack of utility in PVE compared to other classes, combined with the fact that we dont deal significantly more dmg to make up for it (in fact sorcs will still be behind other classes in terms of DPS).
Sallington wrote: »Anything useful that players are wanting added into the game all fall under the category of "Yer ruinin my 'mersion!"
Yet you come here again and again telling ppl you know better about a class you don´t play. Nothing constructive is coming from you.
There's a grand total of 4 classes in this game with more abilities from shared trees than each class. Are you playing the "you don't know what it's like" card because he's not one of the 'signature sorcs' saying "don't panic", or simply because he's disagreeing with the angry mob?
I get the disagreement part, but I'm not sure how much more constructive he could be than to bother to take the time to upload videos demonstrating his point. Unless your definition of constructive is an angry post that gets a lot of 'agrees' from other angry posters.
@Gil.Galad - sorry for adding more garbage to a good thread
Yet you come here again and again telling ppl you know better about a class you don´t play. Nothing constructive is coming from you.
There's a grand total of 4 classes in this game with more abilities from shared trees than each class. Are you playing the "you don't know what it's like" card because he's not one of the 'signature sorcs' saying "don't panic", or simply because he's disagreeing with the angry mob?
I get the disagreement part, but I'm not sure how much more constructive he could be than to bother to take the time to upload videos demonstrating his point. Unless your definition of constructive is an angry post that gets a lot of 'agrees' from other angry posters.
@Gil.Galad - sorry for adding more garbage to a good thread
The problem is that he claims there is no problem yet is only testing "laboratory environment and use" which leads him to the conclusion that the skill is working fine in the "real" world and he is dismissing everyone pointing out the problems the skill has in that environment.
It´s like someone playing fifa 2015 telling a rl soccer player what he has to do. It simply does not work that way.
Yet you come here again and again telling ppl you know better about a class you don´t play. Nothing constructive is coming from you.
There's a grand total of 4 classes in this game with more abilities from shared trees than each class. Are you playing the "you don't know what it's like" card because he's not one of the 'signature sorcs' saying "don't panic", or simply because he's disagreeing with the angry mob?
I get the disagreement part, but I'm not sure how much more constructive he could be than to bother to take the time to upload videos demonstrating his point. Unless your definition of constructive is an angry post that gets a lot of 'agrees' from other angry posters.
@Gil.Galad - sorry for adding more garbage to a good thread
The problem is that he claims there is no problem yet is only testing "laboratory environment and use" which leads him to the conclusion that the skill is working fine in the "real" world and he is dismissing everyone pointing out the problems the skill has in that environment.
It´s like someone playing fifa 2015 telling a rl soccer player what he has to do. It simply does not work that way.
ESO stuff aside, what is more constructive? <opinions/assertions with video and rational discussion>, or "nu uh, you don't know what you're talking about. go away."?
Gil actually got a ZOS response, (not that this thread is choc full of an equal level of counter-analysis), but doesn't that kinda illustrate the difference between feedback that gets taken seriously and easily discarded ranting?
Imagine the horrors if one came along in a NB discussion thread claiming cloak is fine posting a video of him cloaking around craglorn welwas to prove his point. That would be and argument of the same quality @Lied.
Imagine the horrors if one came along in a NB discussion thread claiming cloak is fine posting a video of him cloaking around craglorn welwas to prove his point. That would be and argument of the same quality @Lied.
I'd imagine this would be more effectively dismissed when people started replying with videos of cloak malfunctioning accompanied by explanations rather than simply stating, "you don't play a NB, it doesn't work that way IRL".
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »This is a great post, and is the exact type of feedback that we'd like to see moving forward. Gil.Galad doesn't necessarily agree with some of the changes to the Sorcerer, and that's ok, but he explains his reasoning and provides suggestions after some testing on the PTS.
We've passed this along to the gameplay team, and will work on getting some answers for you all.
Imagine the horrors if one came along in a NB discussion thread claiming cloak is fine posting a video of him cloaking around craglorn welwas to prove his point. That would be and argument of the same quality @Lied.
I'd imagine this would be more effectively dismissed when people started replying with videos of cloak malfunctioning accompanied by explanations rather than simply stating, "you don't play a NB, it doesn't work that way IRL".
It would be better to a have a video where it looks like you're doing it the right way on your screen but you're getting an undesired result... but hell, this is better than nothing.Here searched one for you. Not mine. Are you happy now?
Don't a lot of mechanics screw up when you have a 500+ latency? Didn't get a heal in time/executed unexpectedly because your health bar didn't show it was moving. Didn't reflect a projectile that you didn't even see coming for you. Didn't get a chance to dodge an attack you didn't even see happening. Is there anything that really works just fine with 500+ latency?Here searched one for you. Not mine. Are you happy now?
The problem i´m having is that he is telling ppl that this is a non issue that can be countered by delayed button pressing - when in cyrodiil you frequently have 500+ ping. Having to be extra careful with this delay (bc when it bugs out you have to wait about 1.5s before you can attempt again) is just not practical especially on an in combat heal.
It would be better to a have a video where it looks like you're doing it the right way on your screen but you're getting an undesired result... but hell, this is better than nothing.Here searched one for you. Not mine. Are you happy now?Don't a lot of mechanics screw up when you have a 500+ latency? Didn't get a heal in time/executed unexpectedly because your health bar didn't show it was moving. Didn't reflect a projectile that you didn't even see coming for you. Didn't get a chance to dodge an attack you didn't even see happening. Is there anything that really works just fine with 500+ latency?Here searched one for you. Not mine. Are you happy now?
The problem i´m having is that he is telling ppl that this is a non issue that can be countered by delayed button pressing - when in cyrodiil you frequently have 500+ ping. Having to be extra careful with this delay (bc when it bugs out you have to wait about 1.5s before you can attempt again) is just not practical especially on an in combat heal.
Is there anything that really works just fine with 500+ latency?
What people don´t get is posting a video of the skill failing 100% is the same as posting a video of the skill working 100%. Both is reproduceable with the 2 mins of effort it takes to make a sorc on pts. It has no significance...
It has nothing to do with its real use where the probability of it failing (and you dying bc of that - even if its only 20% of the times you use it and you can blame it on yourself bc you pressed the button to fast - lol) will simply make the skill undesireable.
Edit: I don´t get what is so hard to understand about that. I simply don´t get it.
xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »
I guarantee that your clunky heal will be used in every sorc build after that patch, I mean the first half of this thread talks about how overpowered it is, the first post I quoted in this thread was a guy talking about how great it is Sorcs will admit the heal is overpowered and dks would never admit it, followed by every sorc posting after I commented on how dks get that heal because we don't have bolt escape talking about how your new heal is fine and it's broken and crap and none of you will ever use it. Meanwhile everyone else realizes a bloody huge heal with zero mana cost is actually quite op
xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »
You only need around 30k magicka to make it cost nothing. That is not hard to get. If you want that heal you need to lose the mana cost return and nerf your mobility some more as you not having a heal is why you had that teleport in the first place.. Unless you wanna start throwing out escape options for Templars and dks, and a good heal for nightblades.
@zos_GinaBruno : I would also like to know why if a sorc puts streak and encase on their bar why they are being penalized for getting crystal fragment procs (ie..they dont proc CF)
It's like every MMO that has ever been. There comes a time after the game matures a bit when they start obsessively balancing for fully-geared end game content and just screw-up the whole rest of the game for a class.
The sorc problems we are talking about are not going to be fixed by talking to focus groups of VR14 fully geared sorcs running trials. The problems are about doing the solo content that has been designed for Caldwell Silver and gold where general difficulty is reflected by having larger and larger aggro-linked groups. It's a VR1 - VR10 problem which is basically, where the problem always has been.
A class needs to have the ability to go through that content efficiently with good AOE and self healing off that AOE not because we just want to grind but because that's the way the game forces us to play in that level range.
We used to do that with critical surge and destro staff skills because even before this nerf, unlike other classes, our class always has been AOE-weak... in an AOE-heavy game... so we relied on damage from outside our class skills for the DPS part but at least we could self-heal with a class skill... that option is gone at the same time that cloth armor has also been nerfed to make things worse...and no, pet builds are not the answer since all that does is force an awkward single target approach to dealing with packs of 5 or 6.
It's almost as if sorcs have been balanced for a Caldwell silver and gold that doesn't exist where instead of packs, the challenge is harder single enemies or duos.
But you do still bother to have bolt escape on your bar, right? Yes your shields will still get applied, but have you never burned mana reapplying what was already applied in lag? I love watching my blazing shield animation run a second time with a full shield.
Sphinx2318 wrote: »If ZOS took even half of your suggestions and implemented them, everyone in ESO would be a sorc and no other class. PVP would insta die.
Weekly AA: 44% DK, 21% NB, 20% Templars, 15% Sorcs; 2 full teams had no sorcs.
Sanctum: 41% DK, 24% NB, 22% Templars, 13% Sorcs; 1 full team had no sorcs.
DSA Vet: 43% DK, 23% NB, 21% Templars, 12% Sorcs; 9 full teams had no sorcs.