Still no responce from DEV's about this bug

icenstorm · May 2016

Crit bonus from pot(with crit bonus) still dropping off if a skill that applies crit bonus(while slotted) is only slotted on 1 bar
Example if you have flames of oblivion on one bar and use a pot then bar swap to second bar that doesnt have the crit bonus skill the crit bonus is lost even though pot(with crit bonus) is still active.
@ZOS_GinaBruno @Wrobel

Agency79 · May 2016

Yea, I can vouch for this. Makes using magelight kinda dicey.

STEVIL · May 2016

Also, fails on live as well.

Alcast · May 2016

This bug has been around for over a year now and it is still not fixed. Not even sure the developers know about the bug

https://youtu.be/U7lfELYlmSo

@ZOS_GinaBruno do the devs know about the bug?

icenstorm · May 2016

Pls dev's let us know that you have seen this???

icenstorm · May 2016

@ZOS_AlexTardif

icenstorm · May 2016

@ZOS_GinaBruno, @ZOS_JessicaFolsom, @ZOS_KaiSchober, @ZOS_GaryA, @ZOS_TristanK

Turelus · May 2016

We really need that thread back which listed all known bugs reported by players. I think the player who made it left or just stopped maintaining it though.

I have been considering doing one myself but am worried I won't be able to maintain it.

ZOS_JessicaFolsom · May 2016

This is indeed a bug, and we're looking into it. Thanks, all!

InvitationNotFound · May 2016

nice, only almost 20 days for a response. not bad at all...

STEVIL · May 2016

InvitationNotFound wrote: »

nice, only almost 20 days for a response. not bad at all...

For this thread.
For a bug thats ben around.
For bugs with other threads too.

The idea that its good for devs to spend time responding to every repeat thread of a bug that is know is.., incomprehensible.

Rather hsve them spending time on fixing than this.

But if, under say Player Helping Players the community were to create and maintain a FREQUENTLY SEEN BUGS thread that we could direct folks to instead of spawning multiple bar-swap-potion-buff threads and getting snarky when they dont ALL get an answer.,, that might be actually productive.

But the more we make threads repetitive or unfocused or just tons of useless, hostility and noise vs sucint signal, the more we make it less likely they spend time on these threads.

Imo.
Ymmv.

InvitationNotFound · May 2016

STEVIL wrote: »

The idea that its good for devs to spend time responding to every repeat thread of a bug that is know is.., incomprehensible.

Rather hsve them spending time on fixing than this.

Haven't seen that many dev responses yet. In general the responses are coming from something like a "Community Manager". Well, if they were developing and spending their time on that, it would explain a lot.

STEVIL wrote: »

But if, under say Player Helping Players the community were to create and maintain a FREQUENTLY SEEN BUGS thread that we could direct folks to instead of spawning multiple bar-swap-potion-buff threads and getting snarky when they dont ALL get an answer.,, that might be actually productive.

Actually there were at least 2 threads collecting bugs and ZOS feedback. They both seem dead unfortunately. Besides that the community manager feedback was mediocre.

STEVIL wrote: »

But the more we make threads repetitive or unfocused or just tons of useless, hostility and noise vs sucint signal, the more we make it less likely they spend time on these threads.

Well, i think those community manager, ZOS forum guys are payed to check the forums on a regular basis. I mean they sometimes are pretty good in deleting posts. So you think because of a title such as "Still no responce from DEV's about this bug" it took so long to respond?

Or is it that you don't like my criticism and think such criticism is the reason why they are doing a mediocre job (ignoring posts for a long time)?
Or has it been posted like 20 times before and it's too difficult / time consuming to copy / paste: we're looking into it earlier?

And btw. sometimes a little bit of hostility is more than appropriate. Let the hate flow through you.

klink012 · May 2016

STEVIL wrote: »

InvitationNotFound wrote: »

nice, only almost 20 days for a response. not bad at all...

For this thread.
For a bug thats ben around.
For bugs with other threads too.

The idea that its good for devs to spend time responding to every repeat thread of a bug that is know is.., incomprehensible.

Rather hsve them spending time on fixing than this.

But if, under say Player Helping Players the community were to create and maintain a FREQUENTLY SEEN BUGS thread that we could direct folks to instead of spawning multiple bar-swap-potion-buff threads and getting snarky when they dont ALL get an answer.,, that might be actually productive.

But the more we make threads repetitive or unfocused or just tons of useless, hostility and noise vs sucint signal, the more we make it less likely they spend time on these threads.

Imo.
Ymmv.

Have you saw the population of this game? Not many people play. Have you saw the sheer amount of new forum posts per day? How about the posts where someone actually tags a ZoS employee? Again, not many.

If it took me 20 days to acknowledge my clients on something that is not working... I wouldn't have any clients. This exact reasoning is why bugs like this exist from beta / early release. It's 2 years later and people like you still cut them slack. Ummmm NO. This is not how the world works.

STEVIL · May 2016

klink012 wrote: »

STEVIL wrote: »

InvitationNotFound wrote: »

nice, only almost 20 days for a response. not bad at all...

For this thread.
For a bug thats ben around.
For bugs with other threads too.

The idea that its good for devs to spend time responding to every repeat thread of a bug that is know is.., incomprehensible.

Rather hsve them spending time on fixing than this.

But if, under say Player Helping Players the community were to create and maintain a FREQUENTLY SEEN BUGS thread that we could direct folks to instead of spawning multiple bar-swap-potion-buff threads and getting snarky when they dont ALL get an answer.,, that might be actually productive.

But the more we make threads repetitive or unfocused or just tons of useless, hostility and noise vs sucint signal, the more we make it less likely they spend time on these threads.

Imo.
Ymmv.

Have you saw the population of this game? Not many people play. Have you saw the sheer amount of new forum posts per day? How about the posts where someone actually tags a ZoS employee? Again, not many.

If it took me 20 days to acknowledge my clients on something that is not working... I wouldn't have any clients. This exact reasoning is why bugs like this exist from beta / early release. It's 2 years later and people like you still cut them slack. Ummmm NO. This is not how the world works.

Not many is meaningless.

The closest to an objective reference point is cake day 1. At the moment of launch for a week lomg bonus which only benefited you for advancement if you played... it was standing room only in the three alliance launch points.

I would not use the term "not many" based on that experience combined with my own play experience.

As for slack, i am paying for a product i play " often" and i enjoy "a great deal" and for which my play experience is "almost always great" and i am definitely imo getting my "money's worth" out of. Its not slack i give them but praise and thanks.

Ymmv.