@ZOS_GinaBruno
I hope I'm posting this in the correct forum - it seems like a general topic to me.
The Belgium Gaming Commission has ruled (rather quickly) that yes, loot boxes constitute a form of gambling and they will be seeking that the EU ban them. They focused on the SWBF2 and Overwatch systems but, as I understand it, the ruling is more general than that.
https://www.mmorpg.com/news/belgium-rules-loot-boxes-are-gambling-seeks-to-have-an-eu-ban-implmented-1000046476
IMO, this is a long way from over but it IS a first.
I doubt there will be an official ZOS statement about this but I'm "atting" Gina just in case they do want to comment.
What do the rest of you think?
ZoS, EA and Blizzard wont change it, because they operate under American Law, and not EU laws. So nothing will change in the end.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but while the companies may be based out of the US, if they do business in another country, they ARE subject to their laws... just look at judgement against Google, Apple, etc.. all US based companies. And... if they get them banned in the EU, that's a HUGE market they won't want to miss out on.
My guess is, they'll simply remove them from those countries. And if they do, that means they'll need to figure a way to increase revenue to make up for the lost crate revenue.
This is something that has merely just begun. Even that Belgium commission has not even made a final rulling. This is merely preliminary and the story is just the minister expressing his wish. Yea, they could go through with it but it is likely a long road from where Belgium is now to EU making any changes.
While this is preliminary and far from having an effect anywhere, I guarantee companies are considering their alternatives and especially so since Belgium has expressed their wish to ban all in game sales. If it comes to fruition, game developers will find means to replace that lost revenue from our pockets.
Some who dislike the crates may find the end result less desirable.
So you know they're crap
and still feel the need to protect business that's unfavourable for costumers? You're likely one of those people that just doesn't care about the content of the crates so you don't care how awfully it is implemented. The biggest crate supporters in these threads have ironically always been people that don't buy crown crates.
"You go ahead and keep the game alive with your money while I get to spout nonsense about freedom and how america works." The paying costumer is who really gets to decide what succeeds, not the companies. Of course this is all circumvented when it comes to scam.
As to the many reasons why they're scam: if you actually seek useless consumables again and again then you'll get more value out of directly buying said consumable in the crown store. The gems lure people in with a promise to trade things they don't like for what they're really after. Except each instalment of crates is crammed full of junk so that that rarely happens and even if it does, the amount of gems you get out of them is plain pathetic. This false sense of optimism is most definitely scam as it mostly targets rich, naive or young people.
Victoria's Gambling Regulator: Loot Boxes 'Constitute Gambling':
https://gizmodo.com.au/2017/11/victorias-gambling-regulator-loot-boxes-constitute-gambling/
Victoria's Gambling Regulator: Loot Boxes 'Constitute Gambling':
https://gizmodo.com.au/2017/11/victorias-gambling-regulator-loot-boxes-constitute-gambling/
Which will be challenged and struck down like most idiotic laws Victorias gambling commission attempts.
These morons tried the same thing with Pokemon cards and was laughed out of the courtroom.
As much as the PAWS morality police wants it....it will never happen.
And I will continue to laugh at you.
Stopnaggin wrote: »The fact that a government wants to take a person's choice is all I see in this. Remove crates, bars, brothels and anything else they deem offensive right? Just shut down all gaming unless is Disney because someone may have violent tendencies and get triggered by playing a game that has violence in it. No racing games because it may cause me to speed in my car.
When will people start taking personal responsibility again? I dont the govt any further into my life then they already are. I'm a big boy and can make big boy choices without any help from politicians.
Stopnaggin wrote: »The fact that a government wants to take a person's choice is all I see in this. Remove crates, bars, brothels and anything else they deem offensive right? Just shut down all gaming unless is Disney because someone may have violent tendencies and get triggered by playing a game that has violence in it. No racing games because it may cause me to speed in my car.
When will people start taking personal responsibility again? I dont the govt any further into my life then they already are. I'm a big boy and can make big boy choices without any help from politicians.
Ill post this again, since it is perfectly relevant to what you just said.
Classic. " you should have personal responsibility , go get help "
ok , Ill go get help. Wait, I cant afford it, because the government took away my healthcare.
" Get a job then freeloader!"
Ok, but I cant get a job because I am disabled.
" Then go to the doctor snowflake"
Ok, but I cant afford it because the government took my healthcare away.
" Then stop being lazy !"
Ok, lets ignore the fact that I am disabled, I cant apply for a job or look for one because I have no money for gas , a cell phone, or internet. Can I get some help? I have kids after all.
" No, stop expecting handouts! And you shouldnt have had kids then!"
Well I didnt know I was pregnant until 3 months in and abortion was made illegal in my state, and since planned parenthood was closed, I couldnt afford condoms
You guys get where this is going.
recycle and repeat.
Seriously, in a perfect world everyone wouldnt have problems , everyone would have a fantastic job, no one would be born with a predisposition to addiction, etc. But that isnt the case. Is it? Maybe people should stop voting against their best interests? Its funny how people complain about big government, but are perfectly fine with big government over reaching when it suits them.
Alchemical wrote: »Thalmor-Nordmaster wrote: »
The comparison to Joe Camel is spot on.
It's so easy for people who are not addicted, or don't know anyone who suffers from an addiction, to say "just don't do it lol!" They have no idea how really, truly insidious and down right evil it is.
Stopnaggin wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »Thalmor-Nordmaster wrote: »
The comparison to Joe Camel is spot on.
It's so easy for people who are not addicted, or don't know anyone who suffers from an addiction, to say "just don't do it lol!" They have no idea how really, truly insidious and down right evil it is.
So take everyone else's rights away correct? This is a stupid argument. Because of obesiety we should outlaw sweets and unhealthy food. Cigarettes because of lung cancer. Alcohol because of alcoholics. Absolutely take away my choices because of the negative effects. I dont think so. I like having my own choices, and I don't need any politician to tell me what choices I should make. Its called free will, and as hard as that is to understand, I like it. The consequence are my own. Thats called personal responsibility, I like it too.
Maybe those who have a weakness or addiction should seek help from a professional, but taking away my choice should not be an option.
Storymaster wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno
I hope I'm posting this in the correct forum - it seems like a general topic to me.
The Belgium Gaming Commission has ruled (rather quickly) that yes, loot boxes constitute a form of gambling and they will be seeking that the EU ban them. They focused on the SWBF2 and Overwatch systems but, as I understand it, the ruling is more general than that.
https://www.mmorpg.com/news/belgium-rules-loot-boxes-are-gambling-seeks-to-have-an-eu-ban-implmented-1000046476
IMO, this is a long way from over but it IS a first.
I doubt there will be an official ZOS statement about this but I'm "atting" Gina just in case they do want to comment.
What do the rest of you think?
@Iselin
Ack.... Man, this is a very, very slippery slope and we need to be careful of what the potential repercussions could be, especially with interpretation of the law.
While I am no fan of crime crates and the concept of loot boxes in general, where does one draw the line and what would such laws be open to interpretation for. Also, what if the game becomes unavailable altogether in some regions because of this feature? That seems extremely harsh.
This just doesn't sound good to me on any level. It's a can of worms we don't need opened.
And maybe it's just the American in me, but I hate it when governments try to rob individuals of choice and self-governing.
But its ok for corporations to prey on children and make millions by putting scam crates in the game? Well, that does sound pretty american.
Actually we kind of should, that's part of the reason we have them. To make laws and enforce them for the protection and betterment of society.Farscape76 wrote: »Personal Responsibility ... each person is ...gasp... responsible for their own actions. It is not governments job to be our mommy and tell us what we can and can't purchase.
If you can't handle gambling seek help but you shouldn't expect a government to make the world safe for you. We don't close bars to protect alcoholics.
Grow the f*** up snowflakes
I know it's cool to jump on this bandwagon, but sometimes people want actions taken because it makes things better. ESO would be better without crates, some of us remember the time before the crates.
When I give ZOS real money they are giving me crowns in return, which is what I am buying. If I choose to use those crowns on Crown Crates then that is my choice. I’m not using real money to buy Crown Crates.
I could see Legal using that as a loophole.
Unless your sig is what is on the statute books in your territory, I suspect you're wrong.As my sig says....
“Gambling” requires a wager to win something of tangible value. If the thing won can’t be sold or monetized, it isn’t gambling Period.
Any legislator who thinks that a judge or court will side with them over this is an idiot and should resign immediately. Any player who thinks that this will stop Crown Crates or Loot boxes dream on...if anything it will backfire and end up giving developers even more leeway to market how they see fit.
But what about when your to young to make that choice freely because you don't understand personal responsibility ???
stargazer69 wrote: »
Vulsahdaal wrote: »
Vulsahdaal wrote: »
Its so much more than that bud yes I agree but it's not as simple as that now is it, if everyone who played this game was 18+ you do understand that none of this would even be happening
So you know they're crap
please show me where i said they were crap? you're wrong here.and still feel the need to protect business that's unfavourable for costumers? You're likely one of those people that just doesn't care about the content of the crates so you don't care how awfully it is implemented. The biggest crate supporters in these threads have ironically always been people that don't buy crown crates.
i just told you i have bought crates in the past. so you're wrong here too"You go ahead and keep the game alive with your money while I get to spout nonsense about freedom and how america works." The paying costumer is who really gets to decide what succeeds, not the companies. Of course this is all circumvented when it comes to scam.
As to the many reasons why they're scam: if you actually seek useless consumables again and again then you'll get more value out of directly buying said consumable in the crown store. The gems lure people in with a promise to trade things they don't like for what they're really after. Except each instalment of crates is crammed full of junk so that that rarely happens and even if it does, the amount of gems you get out of them is plain pathetic. This false sense of optimism is most definitely scam as it mostly targets rich, naive or young people.
the many reasons huh? none of that shows its a scam. it just shows you wouldnt know a scam if it hit you in the face.
false sense of optimism? go whine about that to all those people who buy lottery tickets and scratchies. that is gambling and is perfectly fine and legal, yet does far more damage than this game ever could or would.
Ill post this again, since it is perfectly relevant to what you just said.