vanderghast wrote: »As for an airplane being a bad submarine, if you didn't get it yet, you, as human being, are not bad, you are dumb. Yes, that is calling a cat, a cat, and under the name of science and observation, I claim the right to call a dumb, a dumb.

Oh god I can stop laughing, the cat part is pricelessvanderghast wrote: »As for an airplane being a bad submarine, if you didn't get it yet, you, as human being, are not bad, you are dumb. Yes, that is calling a cat, a cat, and under the name of science and observation, I claim the right to call a dumb, a dumb.
GossiTheDog wrote: »@vanderghast, almost all the topics in this forums are players helping other people with customer support issues. Just for info. You cannot dictate how the forum is used.
Fairydragon3 wrote: »
vanderghast wrote: »As for an airplane being a bad submarine, if you didn't get it yet, you, as human being, are not bad, you are dumb. Yes, that is calling a cat, a cat, and under the name of science and observation, I claim the right to call a dumb, a dumb.
And that's entirely unsurprising isn't it?people still don't know the shield can be used to great advantage.
During the tutorial the game teaches you that you 'block' an attack when the mob gets the 'white shooting lines' animation .. which is entirely absent when the 'blue sphere' attack happens with Titans and the like.
I'm probably just stupid, but until I read about this tactic I don't think I'd have done that .. it's illogical that a staff could block magic so why would a non-shield user ever consider it?
Yes, it's easy to poke fun at those who don't know something which seems obvious to you, but instead of laughing maybe you should pause to think how you learned it and then realise it's not at all 'obvious'.
vanderghast wrote: »@Babylon Maybe you are right, why would I care, in fact, if I defeated or not the Molag Bal encounter that you have in mind. All what I know is that I end up the sequence of quest about of saving the world from him. If he comes back in another future sequence, I am not aware of it ... and sincerely, I don't mind! If it is really harder than Mannimarco, and only solo-able, I will GLADLY SKIP it!
vanderghast wrote: »@KracsNZ: it is not MY job, indeed, I just recall to ESO the commercial promises and commitments they made. And that Mannimarco quest (and any other like) isn't toward their own commitments.
kirnmalidus wrote: »And even if you could skip both of them, it still wouldn't solve your problem because some trash mobs in the Vet zones are as tough or tougher than Mannimarco. So good luck with that.
vanderghast wrote: »@aipex8_ESO: I will explain it one more, just for you: I DON'T CARE if it is harder, if it is another quest, whatever. I will just SKIP it, duh! My point is not about bragging about how good I am.
The fundamental flaw in your argument is that what's 'fun' to you is 'fun' to everyone else.vanderghast wrote: »I never said to make all the quests easy! Can keep the crazy ones optional. But that, you won't play games where you cannot brag about your success? Do you play to enjoy your play, or you play to fill your apparent lack of ack. from the real word?
I'm guessing English must be your second language because your comprehension skill are severely lacking. Either that or you're a troll trying to get a rise out of everyone who disagrees with your point of view. The challenge aspect of a game is the "fun" aspect. Why do you think games like Dark Souls is so popular? If a game is not challenging then it becomes repetitive, monotonous and no longer "fun". Brag about successes? My gawd, get off your bandwagon.
Your comment about Dark Souls (about which I know little but I think I get your reference to it) is obviously valid, but then so is the statement GW2 very popular so clearly people don't want 'hard' content.
New games like FFXIV which demand frequent and regular grouping even just to level up are popular but that doesn't mean equal or even larger numbers are turned off and don't play because of that: I think it fair to say a goor proportion of players of games you probably look down on as 'eZmode' like LOTRO and GW2 wouldn't go anywhere near games that force grouping in that way.
That's the problem so many times on forums like this, people are insular, they only consider what THEY want and how THEY view things and deride anyone else who disagrees .. classically seen in the 'casuals versus hardcore' wars .. and this thread so clearly encapsulates this problem.
Some of the rabid comments hurled at the OP are appalling. Not all who vehemently disagree with him are like that, some are well-argued but some are simply toxic 'you suck, l2p'.