The only one delve I do not like is the one on Artaeum. I reached that skyshard maybe on 2 or 3 out of my 15+ toons. Never can get to it even with a guide.

I hate places where I get turned around and confused even with a map. The old style does me fine. Fortunately, I don't need skyshards from all the new ones.... there's plenty without them.

I like having a mix of both. I wish that companion unlock quests though would be placed in the simple ones for the sake of alts.

I don't really care either way, but I do actually find it a little fun to have to look at a map and figure out the most efficient way to make my way around the whole delve/public dungeon or how to get to a skyshard.

I much prefer interesting delves and public dungeons. I don't find any of them to be confusing, although some require some processing to understand -- which I enjoy doing.

I don't prefer most of the base game delves. Most are uninteresting with too little variety. I think that's because ESO launched late, so one of the corners they cut was delve variety. Some may recall many base game delves were simplified at launch and expanded a little after.

ESO maps are terrible. Especially the multiple-level ones.

Sometimes I just give up and do something else because I get frustrated.

Ima just after them skill points and shards

There are some that are fine and others that are a pain. For example, from Necrom, Gorne is fine for a public dungeon. I find the Underweave confusing.

For delves, Anchre Egg Minebis rather bland. I really like Fathoms Drift. Quires Wind is a confusing maze I don't like at all.

Hapexamendios wrote: »

There are some that are fine and others that are a pain. For example, from Necrom, Gorne is fine for a public dungeon. I find the Underweave confusing.

For delves, Anchre Egg Minebis rather bland. I really like Fathoms Drift. Quires Wind is a confusing maze I don't like at all.

Yeah, Gome is really just one big circle. I like it a lot. Underweave is just awful, mostly I just don't like Apoycrapha, all that sickly green and anemic yellow is off-putting.

I don't think they've changed that much. I wish the Companion quests replaced a point-of-interest quest so that they were more like Bastian/Mirri/Ember/Isobel instead of Sharp/Azandar. I assume they put Sharp and Azandar's quests in the public dungeons just for efficiency, but instead they should have replaced point-of-interest requests, which otherwise serve the same purpose of "quest with its own unique area".

Base game delves are too linear. The DLC delves were a great improvement, I really prefer the added complexity.

Until I hit the Apocrypha delves... At which point (IMHO) it became inherently obvious that they were made overly complex and for the wrong reason. They weren't made complex to make it more fun (cuz they're not), but instead they're overly complex simply to show off the art department's shiny new building concept. It all looks awesome for the first few minutes after entering for the first time, but then it becomes old really quick. The abundance of multiple levels interlaced throughout the maps are too complex to even map it in any discernable manner.

Multipath dungeons and delves are nice. One of my earlier complaints about the base game delves was the "copy paste" circle with the locked/one-way door that we used to get.

However, multi-level multi-path dungeons make the map almost useless, and I am not a fan of those.

This will probably be a very unpopular opinion, but: I don't think skyshards should be easy to get.

Another unpopular opinion? I like complex delves, it makes them more interesting (for me).

I don't care per se, but I do dislike the ones with too much 3D where it is very hard to figure out how to get to a specific point, especially without a quest leading you there, or sometimes even with a quest!

These things never have a snack bar at the half way point, to take a break, use the facilities, and have some pizza.