kathandira wrote: »kathandira wrote: »Usernames are actually Protected under Privacy Act in the EU and Canada. They are considered Privately-Identifiable Information (PII) and are protected by those countries laws because they can be used in combination with other information sources to cross reference to Identify an Individual; their physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity.
So when I record game footage and put it on youtube, and you are in the video, with your username and your character name, how does that work? Would I have to censor your name out of my video?
No. Unless ZOS asks you to remove the video everything is fine.
I'm more suggesting the issue of Privacy of a players username being displayed. People are concerned that since their username is shown in the metrics, it is an issue. But their username is easily displayed in screenshots and videos on a regular basis.
Frankly I don't understand what you wanna say^^ If ppl are concerned about their username being shown, they can set their client to "anonymous" and their @name won't be displayed in logs anymore.
I'm pretty sure, a full opt-out would be possible very quickly, if everybody cancelled their Elsweyr preorder because of the forced logging. I did and got my money back.
You do realise that this is a base game feature coming with elsweyr? So you will get this anyways in the game.
And people will not stop preordering because of this....
I'm pretty sure, a full opt-out would be possible very quickly, if everybody cancelled their Elsweyr preorder because of the forced logging. I did and got my money back.
You do realise that this is a base game feature coming with elsweyr? So you will get this anyways in the game.
And people will not stop preordering because of this....
Ofc I know that I will still get logging, just like I will still get my nightblade archer main nerfed. Both very disrespectful so no more money, simple as that.
@ZOS_BobbyWeir @ZOS_GinaBruno
FYI: Appear Anonymous was still set to default OFF when logging in to PTS this week. It was suppose to be changed to automatically "ON".
xMovingTarget wrote: »As a fellow acid spray Spammer, I dont want people to see my epic 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 presses!80% of the posts in here
Ugg, thread is still going?
More information is always a good thing, welcome to the 21st century.
In pvp wouldn’t you like to know who’s running crap defenses so vicious death is killing everyone around them? In pve wouldn’t you want to know who’s contributing most vs comparing dummy humping?
I don’t get how someone could be against it.
xMovingTarget wrote: »As a fellow acid spray Spammer, I dont want people to see my epic 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 presses!80% of the posts in here
You are critisizing other ppl for forcing their oppinion on you while forcing your oppinion on them at the same time - not bad man, not bad. Regarding your last sentence: It makes no sense at all as players can switch themselves to anonymous at any given time. Oh and don't bring the point "but if 3 ppl are not anonymous, they can deduce my results from the logs", because, believe me, players will find out that you suck without using logs.Ugg, thread is still going?
More information is always a good thing, welcome to the 21st century.
In pvp wouldn’t you like to know who’s running crap defenses so vicious death is killing everyone around them? In pve wouldn’t you want to know who’s contributing most vs comparing dummy humping?
I don’t get how someone could be against it.
No one is against it per/se. If you wanna go that way, sure! Thing is that as that one guy said, people can be super toxic.
I am sorry you don't get it, maybe when you grow up a bit. Why you trying to force what you like to everyone?
When option could be for raid leader to enable it, still sustaining everyones choice to disable/enable. Or system like that.
You are critisizing other ppl for forcing their oppinion on you while forcing your oppinion on them at the same time - not bad man, not bad. Regarding your last sentence: It makes no sense at all as players can switch themselves to anonymous at any given time. Oh and don't bring the point "but if 3 ppl are not anonymous, they can deduce my results from the logs", because, believe me, players will find out that you suck without using logs.Ugg, thread is still going?
More information is always a good thing, welcome to the 21st century.
In pvp wouldn’t you like to know who’s running crap defenses so vicious death is killing everyone around them? In pve wouldn’t you want to know who’s contributing most vs comparing dummy humping?
I don’t get how someone could be against it.
No one is against it per/se. If you wanna go that way, sure! Thing is that as that one guy said, people can be super toxic.
I am sorry you don't get it, maybe when you grow up a bit. Why you trying to force what you like to everyone?
When option could be for raid leader to enable it, still sustaining everyones choice to disable/enable. Or system like that.
You are critisizing other ppl for forcing their oppinion on you while forcing your oppinion on them at the same time - not bad man, not bad. Regarding your last sentence: It makes no sense at all as players can switch themselves to anonymous at any given time. Oh and don't bring the point "but if 3 ppl are not anonymous, they can deduce my results from the logs", because, believe me, players will find out that you suck without using logs.Ugg, thread is still going?
More information is always a good thing, welcome to the 21st century.
In pvp wouldn’t you like to know who’s running crap defenses so vicious death is killing everyone around them? In pve wouldn’t you want to know who’s contributing most vs comparing dummy humping?
I don’t get how someone could be against it.
No one is against it per/se. If you wanna go that way, sure! Thing is that as that one guy said, people can be super toxic.
I am sorry you don't get it, maybe when you grow up a bit. Why you trying to force what you like to everyone?
When option could be for raid leader to enable it, still sustaining everyones choice to disable/enable. Or system like that.
Just because you can find out stuff about someone now, doesn't mean it should be done the way proposed taking it to whole next level to see stuff from other groups too, the whole thing. UNLESS it can be turned off raid group wide.
Also its no ones business what gear sets Im using. That you can't see or figure out now (well, theoritically you can but in practise its impossible).
WoW did exactly that, and now everyone is using exactly same specs, abilities and sets for their class or not get into raid groups.
This might actually be a good idea but it has to go one step further, even without numbers you can gauge someone's "dps" so the best thing would be to just give everybody the same amount of damage in a group no matter who is hitting or not hitting the boss/monster. That way everybody will be happy and nobody will have to worry about not pulling their (reasonable) weight in group content.To address the toxicity concerns raised, the game has to stop giving any form of damage numbers so DPS can not be measured.
Also its no ones business what gear sets Im using. That you can't see or figure out now (well, theoritically you can but in practise its impossible).
I genuinely can't tell if people in this thread are being serious or not lolThis might actually be a good idea but it has to go one step further, even without numbers you can gauge someone's "dps" so the best thing would be to just give everybody the same amount of damage in a group no matter who is hitting or not hitting the boss/monster. That way everybody will be happy and nobody will have to worry about not pulling their (reasonable) weight in group content.To address the toxicity concerns raised, the game has to stop giving any form of damage numbers so DPS can not be measured.
That's the beauty of it, I both was and was not serious.I genuinely can't tell if people in this thread are being serious or not lolThis might actually be a good idea but it has to go one step further, even without numbers you can gauge someone's "dps" so the best thing would be to just give everybody the same amount of damage in a group no matter who is hitting or not hitting the boss/monster. That way everybody will be happy and nobody will have to worry about not pulling their (reasonable) weight in group content.To address the toxicity concerns raised, the game has to stop giving any form of damage numbers so DPS can not be measured.
LjAnimalchin wrote: »People in this thread are confusing their data with zos's data. Your opt out is uninstalling and not playing. You don't have any right to play a videogame anonymously.
LjAnimalchin wrote: »People in this thread are confusing their data with zos's data. Your opt out is uninstalling and not playing. You don't have any right to play a videogame anonymously.
LjAnimalchin wrote: »People in this thread are confusing their data with zos's data. Your opt out is uninstalling and not playing. You don't have any right to play a videogame anonymously.
But it's not ZOS' data. It is "user/player data" and ZOS can't do anything they want with it. The protection of that data in some countries is part of their Privacy act and ZOS must follow that act, otherwise face financial and other court ordered fines.
Why do you think Facebook is getting it's butt handed handed to it with lawsuits and fines from Countries where it has been found they broke a user's privacy rights? The Cambridge Analytical crap is not much different to what is happening here. The UK already fined FB for over $650,000usd, and Canada is in the middle of taking them to Court to enforce the Privacy Act.
Cambridge Analytical made a Third Party Program accessed through Facebook by a game app for a psychological test. It took the information about you and the people on your friends lists and compiled it, whether or not your friends used the app. Facebook is getting in a lot of trouble because there was no "Meaningful Consent" given to allow this Third Party game app to get the users information nor their friends information.
ESO Logger, can record what you do in game, what you wear. Whether or not you are in a group with someone, and whether or not you want someone to record what you are doing. It's not enough that you are placed on anonymous. What you do in game and what is recorded by others can be used in such a way that it CAN be used to identify you and can be used to compile information such as how often you log in and form groups, play time. Play style. All things that can be placed in a database and scrutinized.
For other players AND this Third Party website/app to be able to lawfully record anything I do in game, ZOS is required to put in place measures for Meaningful Consent and an option to completely Opt-Out of anything being recorded at all.
It's in their best interest to come up of a way to do this, before releasing this into the live game, because the costs afterwards could get staggering.
I recommend for people who are against this, to notify their Privacy Commissions about the intent of what this program is doing so they can work with ZOS to ensure our Privacy Rights are enforced.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »LjAnimalchin wrote: »People in this thread are confusing their data with zos's data. Your opt out is uninstalling and not playing. You don't have any right to play a videogame anonymously.
But it's not ZOS' data. It is "user/player data" and ZOS can't do anything they want with it. The protection of that data in some countries is part of their Privacy act and ZOS must follow that act, otherwise face financial and other court ordered fines.
Why do you think Facebook is getting it's butt handed handed to it with lawsuits and fines from Countries where it has been found they broke a user's privacy rights? The Cambridge Analytical crap is not much different to what is happening here. The UK already fined FB for over $650,000usd, and Canada is in the middle of taking them to Court to enforce the Privacy Act.
Cambridge Analytical made a Third Party Program accessed through Facebook by a game app for a psychological test. It took the information about you and the people on your friends lists and compiled it, whether or not your friends used the app. Facebook is getting in a lot of trouble because there was no "Meaningful Consent" given to allow this Third Party game app to get the users information nor their friends information.
ESO Logger, can record what you do in game, what you wear. Whether or not you are in a group with someone, and whether or not you want someone to record what you are doing. It's not enough that you are placed on anonymous. What you do in game and what is recorded by others can be used in such a way that it CAN be used to identify you and can be used to compile information such as how often you log in and form groups, play time. Play style. All things that can be placed in a database and scrutinized.
For other players AND this Third Party website/app to be able to lawfully record anything I do in game, ZOS is required to put in place measures for Meaningful Consent and an option to completely Opt-Out of anything being recorded at all.
It's in their best interest to come up of a way to do this, before releasing this into the live game, because the costs afterwards could get staggering.
I recommend for people who are against this, to notify their Privacy Commissions about the intent of what this program is doing so they can work with ZOS to ensure our Privacy Rights are enforced.
The ESO Logger can only record combat information. It can't record how often you play, it can't record how often you play in a group. It can't record how much you spend in the crown store. It can't record your play style. It can ONLY record AFTER its been turned on. Your fear mongering is astounding.
Why do you think Facebook is getting it's butt handed handed to it with lawsuits and fines from Countries where it has been found they broke a user's privacy rights? The Cambridge Analytical crap is not much different to what is happening here. The UK already fined FB for over $650,000usd, and Canada is in the middle of taking them to Court to enforce the Privacy Act.
Cambridge Analytical made a Third Party Program accessed through Facebook by a game app for a psychological test. It took the information about you and the people on your friends lists and compiled it, whether or not your friends used the app. Facebook is getting in a lot of trouble because there was no "Meaningful Consent" given to allow this Third Party game app to get the users information nor their friends information.