Valen_Byte wrote: »

ŞσƦѦ wrote: »

Aleswell getting hit by pop locked EP massive zerg and 3 bars zerg of AD while AD has EP home keep and has 4 emp keeps and they say EP mostly fights AD lol.

Edit: Just want to add that holy crap DC is doing well. Around 100+ reds here and 50+ yellow and they can hardly even keep Aleswell flagged, we just keep smashing back the orange zerg over and over. Nice work DC.

One battle, one day. That's your evidence? Lol

You havent even been playing long enough to have a valid opinion on this. No sane person would disagree that AD, gets double teamed the most. You know what? We are fine with it.

Good move. Set up the cards so anyone who disagrees is "insane". Tossing around insults, playing the vet card, or anything else you have to throw around won't change facts. You've only played AD so your "opinion" is bias. The only attacks that ever really come from EP on AD are bridge battles between Alessia and Sej. There is no real objective there, people just want quick pvp. You're not getting double teamed because people are camping/fighting at a bridge; just don't go there. Those fighting at the bridge don't wanna deal with ADs mindless zergs anyway, they're looking for somewhat small scale pvp. I guess it's only fair to add that also sometimes when EP is not interfering with us on DC trying to dethrone AD, SOMETIMES EP attacks AD to try to get their scrolls back while DC is keeping AD busy.

Edit: Also the only reason you would be "fine with it" (if it were even true) is because at all hours of the day you guys shell out multiple 24man zergs and until this week have out-numbered every faction mostly 2 to 1 so you have an overwhelming advantage no matter what things appear to be in your mind. There is also the fact that AD is the only faction where almost everyone logs in and immediately type "X" (example) for group for an addon's auto invite to a zerg; no one really even tries to fight without the assistance of a zerg so you have that in your favor as well.

You guys get attacked the least by EP who until recently are the lowest population and most disorganized because why in the world would they want to keep smashing their head into a wall fighting completely outnumbered and outclassed by multiple mindless zergs?

Adenoma wrote: »

I think he's mostly making the point that a sample size of one is a poor means of demonstrating a trend.

Because he knows that that one was the only relevant point at that time. I could go back and say "hey there was this time and that time" but it was irrelevant to the current situation.

Right after AD claims they are double teamed the most we see all populations pop locked, AD w/ 4 emp keeps and having EP's home keep and EP still with their pop lock attacks DC while AD does the same.

Yeah, I'm out. Thread's been real, guys. I miss the good ol' days.

@Sreja_Bone , add me to the club with @DeadlyRecluse . This thing has lost its fun.

Funny how I RESPOND to @Vyle_Byte & @Adenoma 's claims that AD gets double teamed the most logically pointing out an actual event where it's happening and all the sudden the thread is so bad and we need to let it go and they're leaving the thread (which they're not it's just for attention) but when they make these claims that I was simply RESPONDING to that's okay.

It's all good with them as long as you agree with them.

Nah, man, you just have a way with words. It's just sadly a way that seems to rub people the wrong way. Everyone's good with a little good natured gibing, but it gets taken too far if it's serious or all the time.

Just maybe relax, it's not like you have anything to prove, everyone knows you're good at the game, and that DC is the best organized faction, no need to shove it in people's face all the time.

*runs and hides*

@Vyle_Byte I would have thought you'd know to ignore the part that didn't pertain to you since it was generally addressing both people as they both are the same faction, guild, and parrot the same things. I also didn't realize the slight difference in names so yeah I did think I was responding to your husband. I apologize for that.

The camaraderie you speak of only takes place when people agree with the vocal AD members on this thread that try to gang up on anyone who disagrees with them. You may not have been monitoring this thread enough to see the posts before they have been deleted but your husband as well as Adenoma, and a few of his guildies have made some very clear attacks on myself and others who disagree with them.

Whenever we respond that is when the thread is turning into this and that and was better before we posted blah blah blah. Those vocal AD members try to bully everyone who doesn't agree off the thread then claim the thread has gone to crap when it doesn't work.

Your husband just went on to directly and indirectly call people who don't agree with him delusional and insane but you intentionally ignore and fail to address them comments. Your husband making remarks like that is (to use your words) "turning the thread into something ugly" so perhaps you should start there if you actually care about the thread.

ŞσƦѦ wrote: »

@Vyle_Byte I would have thought you'd know to ignore the part that didn't pertain to you since it was generally addressing both people as they both are the same faction and parrot the sames thing. I also didn't realize the slight difference in names so yeah I did think I was responding to your husband.

The comrade you speak of only takes place when people agree with the vocal AD members on this thread that try to gang up on anyone who disagrees with them. You may not have been monitoring this thread enough to see the posts before they have been deleted but your husband as well as Adenoma, and a few of his guildies have made some very clear attacks on myself and others who disagree with them.

The thing is whenever we respond that is when the thread is turning into this and that and was better before we posted blah blah blah. Those vocal AD members try to bully everyone who doesn't agree off the thread then claim the thread has gone to crap when it doesn't work.

Your husband just went on to directly and indirectly call people who don't agree with him delusional and insane but you intentionally ignore and fail to address them comments. Your husband making remarks like that is (to use your words) "turning the thread into something ugly" so perhaps you should start there if you actually care about the thread.

Lmao dude. What I say to my husband is none of your or the forums business. Clearly.
I spoke up when I saw how it was going, from ALL sides. Why? Bc I do care. And I also care enough not to let you bait me into arguing.

I was speaking more in generalities than about this latest sequence in particular. If you pull that comment from the context of what's gone before, you are correct. Even in context, a more reasoned, placid response would have been in order. I'll stand by my statement (the whole of my statement ) while admitting that you have reason to be provoked.

I think maybe we could all do a better job of at least appearing to be adults talking about a game.

And it's camaraderie everyone ( not sure why that's the one that awakened my inner vocab nerd).

- pushes glasses back up in place with pointer finger -

skepticalfox wrote: »

Thank you.