KisoValley wrote: »Rofl @ NA drama.
Mythical didn't allow shieldbreaker, no malubeths on classes with major mending, no cp/skill changes and it ran as smooth as possible with no complaints after only 2 weekends ago or whenever their tournament was held (Only time skill changes were allowed was in Shey vs Malcolm Sorc vs Sorc semi finals, where Dusk made them fight without shields because the fight was never going to end otherwise).
Meanwhile I'm hearing the winner of this tournament won based off a cheese item set and changes CP/skills based on who he fights? Sick. Not surprised about the outcome of the tournament or the arguing lol.
NA dueling guilds should probably take a page from Mythicals book, and I'm not saying that just because I'm from EU, it would just cause a lot less drama and more accurate results instead of the winner unsurprisingly wearing shieldbreaker.
Grats to Sabre anyway, I know you're considered a top dueler so well played.
Simple rules, sexy gameplay.
Quick question: Do you guys over there even eat popcorn to fully enjoy our NA drama? Lol
We do. Especially with all the delicious salt here.
SleepyTroll wrote: »Sabre is an excellent dueler, however, he completely changes his gear and all his champion points depending who he is going against to completely counter them.
Which is why I don't participate in duels and I'm praying Zenimax puts in an official system for structured PvP.
Until then it's in a terrible state.
What's wrong with him changing his gear and CP to counter someone? Who wouldn't go into something competitive and think about their opponent how they play and how you are going to counter them? Everything ever that puts two people against each other is based on this system. moves and counter moves, whether that means changing your gear, skills, CP or reacting to a move that they just made. If anything Sabre Ali being able to shut people down before even beginning the fight by changing his build makes him a better player than someone who sticks with the same build no matter the opponent. Structured PVP wouldn't change people from countering...
You are dead wrong.
In every competitive sport on the planet you have to declare your "gear" before every tournament or match. If you change your gear -- you are disqualified. See the rules for golf, tennis, soccer, football, basketball, cycling, racing, etc. There is a huge amount of strategy involved in selected your toolkit or "gear" -- the rest is skill.
An example: in golf you are allowed a select number of clubs. If you are found with more (or less!) anytime during the tournament you are immediately disqualified.
Which is why, for a similar competitive type of play, I don't understand why duels are ever held in CP campaigns.
It's an easy check to insure that no one swaps or artificially inflates their gameplay via CP.
And I see no issue with gear swap. But it should be before each match and general rules by all parties on which sets should not be used.
Because the game is balanced for CP.
You can´t win against shieldbreaker on a sorc on no CP because it does a fixed dmg value that is balanced for CP crit/dmg/heal and stats.
I´ve demolished really good sorcs on non CP by simply spamming bow light because there is no way to outheal that kind of dmg.
No CP is only treating symptoms while creating other problems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yldOZyVvo3YRinaldoGandolphi wrote: »I'll never question Sabre skill, he quite literally one of the last of the DC old guard...he is the only DC emp of Wabbajack that still plays.
Did you know Sabre was last ever DC emp of Wabbajack? He was proceeded by Johnny Hammersticks and Whispers with Ravens.
I don't know nothing about how he builds for duels and don't care, Sabre knows I will and have always held him in the highest regard he got and held emp when emp really really mattered big time.
SleepyTroll wrote: »Sabre is an excellent dueler, however, he completely changes his gear and all his champion points depending who he is going against to completely counter them.
Which is why I don't participate in duels and I'm praying Zenimax puts in an official system for structured PvP.
Until then it's in a terrible state.
What's wrong with him changing his gear and CP to counter someone? Who wouldn't go into something competitive and think about their opponent how they play and how you are going to counter them? Everything ever that puts two people against each other is based on this system. moves and counter moves, whether that means changing your gear, skills, CP or reacting to a move that they just made. If anything Sabre Ali being able to shut people down before even beginning the fight by changing his build makes him a better player than someone who sticks with the same build no matter the opponent. Structured PVP wouldn't change people from countering...
You are dead wrong.
In every competitive sport on the planet you have to declare your "gear" before every tournament or match. If you change your gear -- you are disqualified. See the rules for golf, tennis, soccer, football, basketball, cycling, racing, etc. There is a huge amount of strategy involved in selected your toolkit or "gear" -- the rest is skill.
An example: in golf you are allowed a select number of clubs. If you are found with more (or less!) anytime during the tournament you are immediately disqualified.
Which is why, for a similar competitive type of play, I don't understand why duels are ever held in CP campaigns.
It's an easy check to insure that no one swaps or artificially inflates their gameplay via CP.
And I see no issue with gear swap. But it should be before each match and general rules by all parties on which sets should not be used.
Because the game is balanced for CP.
You can´t win against shieldbreaker on a sorc on no CP because it does a fixed dmg value that is balanced for CP crit/dmg/heal and stats.
I´ve demolished really good sorcs on non CP by simply spamming bow light because there is no way to outheal that kind of dmg.
No CP is only treating symptoms while creating other problems.
No excuse tbh. Within the context of duels, the proper tournament would require you adhere to a strict gear palatte to encourage fair play. And If people abuse CP to push advantage per fight, then it makes sense to embrace non-cp while pushing for better balance.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »I'll never question Sabre skill, he quite literally one of the last of the DC old guard...he is the only DC emp of Wabbajack that still plays.
Did you know Sabre was last ever DC emp of Wabbajack? He was proceeded by Johnny Hammersticks and Whispers with Ravens.
I don't know nothing about how he builds for duels and don't care, Sabre knows I will and have always held him in the highest regard he got and held emp when emp really really mattered big time.
KisoValley wrote: »Rofl @ NA drama.
Mythical didn't allow shieldbreaker, no malubeths on classes with major mending, no cp/skill changes and it ran as smooth as possible with no complaints after only 2 weekends ago or whenever their tournament was held (Only time skill changes were allowed was in Shey vs Malcolm Sorc vs Sorc semi finals, where Dusk made them fight without shields because the fight was never going to end otherwise).
Meanwhile I'm hearing the winner of this tournament won based off a cheese item set and changes CP/skills based on who he fights? Sick. Not surprised about the outcome of the tournament or the arguing lol.
NA dueling guilds should probably take a page from Mythicals book, and I'm not saying that just because I'm from EU, it would just cause a lot less drama and more accurate results instead of the winner unsurprisingly wearing shieldbreaker.
Grats to Sabre anyway, I know you're considered a top dueler so well played.
Simple rules, sexy gameplay.
Quick question: Do you guys over there even eat popcorn to fully enjoy our NA drama? Lol
SleepyTroll wrote: »
I know you are mad because you're no longer relevant Sypher.

SleepyTroll wrote: »
I know you are mad because you're no longer relevant Sypher.
Yeah, seriously @Sypher . So irrelevant.

Publius_Scipio wrote: »SleepyTroll wrote: »
I know you are mad because you're no longer relevant Sypher.
Yeah, seriously @Sypher . So irrelevant.
We all know you want to date him.
hahahah Scipio strikes yet again!

Publius_Scipio wrote: »SleepyTroll wrote: »
I know you are mad because you're no longer relevant Sypher.
Yeah, seriously @Sypher . So irrelevant.
We all know you want to date him.
hahahah Scipio strikes yet again!
My heart belongs to another.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »I'll never question Sabre skill, he quite literally one of the last of the DC old guard...he is the only DC emp of Wabbajack that still plays.
Did you know Sabre was last ever DC emp of Wabbajack? He was proceeded by Johnny Hammersticks and Whispers with Ravens.
I don't know nothing about how he builds for duels and don't care, Sabre knows I will and have always held him in the highest regard he got and held emp when emp really really mattered big time.
Preceded or proceeded? I thought Whispers With Ravens was the first ever DC emperor?
SleepyTroll wrote: »Sabre is an excellent dueler, however, he completely changes his gear and all his champion points depending who he is going against to completely counter them.
Which is why I don't participate in duels and I'm praying Zenimax puts in an official system for structured PvP.
Until then it's in a terrible state.
What's wrong with him changing his gear and CP to counter someone? Who wouldn't go into something competitive and think about their opponent how they play and how you are going to counter them? Everything ever that puts two people against each other is based on this system. moves and counter moves, whether that means changing your gear, skills, CP or reacting to a move that they just made. If anything Sabre Ali being able to shut people down before even beginning the fight by changing his build makes him a better player than someone who sticks with the same build no matter the opponent. Structured PVP wouldn't change people from countering...
You are dead wrong.
In every competitive sport on the planet you have to declare your "gear" before every tournament or match. If you change your gear -- you are disqualified. See the rules for golf, tennis, soccer, football, basketball, cycling, racing, etc. There is a huge amount of strategy involved in selected your toolkit or "gear" -- the rest is skill.
An example: in golf you are allowed a select number of clubs. If you are found with more (or less!) anytime during the tournament you are immediately disqualified.
Which is why, for a similar competitive type of play, I don't understand why duels are ever held in CP campaigns.
It's an easy check to insure that no one swaps or artificially inflates their gameplay via CP.
And I see no issue with gear swap. But it should be before each match and general rules by all parties on which sets should not be used.
PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
There are no right answers. It's all about enjoyable gameplay which is entirely subjective. Therefore groups of like-minded players who play sub-games in a vacuum (duels, GvG, etc) develop rules that put an emphasis on the most-enjoyed elements of gameplay and limit elements considered tedious or negative in some way.
IMO, most players don't want combat in ESO to be a CP chess match in which the focal point of the gameplay is tailoring CP allocation to each individual opponent. To me, that is very tedious. I enjoy theorycrafting and developing builds suited for a variety of circumstances, but I don't want that to be part of active gameplay as something I may do multiple times during a play session.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
This might be one of the most significant posts in this whole thread. Quite possibly sinking Sypher's battleship this time around. If not sunk, then definitely a huge gaping hole in the hull and water rushing in. Sometimes you have to concede defeat.
On top of that, it seems the EU players are much more smart by instating tournament rules. If Sabre did change CP and gear around, and there was no rule against it, can't fault him. Maybe those who fell to Sabre were the fools for not changing things up to stop Sabre. And if you agree there, then I can make the argument that a COVENANT SOLDIER outsmarted the elves and drunks and won! MAKE RULES PEOPLE!!!!
PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
Publius_Scipio wrote: »PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
This might be one of the most significant posts in this whole thread. Quite possibly sinking Sypher's battleship this time around. If not sunk, then definitely a huge gaping hole in the hull and water rushing in. Sometimes you have to concede defeat.
On top of that, it seems the EU players are much more smart by instating tournament rules. If Sabre did change CP and gear around, and there was no rule against it, can't fault him. Maybe those who fell to Sabre were the fools for not changing things up to stop Sabre. And if you agree there, then I can make the argument that a COVENANT SOLDIER outsmarted the elves and drunks and won! MAKE RULES PEOPLE!!!!
There where rules. and unspoken codes of conduct as well.
1.What you start dueling with, You stick with. No changes to anything.
2. No lightning staves
3. No exploiting
unspoken agreement among duelers : No immovables, no LOS, No perma stealthing and purposely prolonging the matches.
PosternHouse wrote: »An MMA fighter or boxer tailors their entire training camp to specifically counter a particular fighter. Yet, no one detracts from the entertainment value or difficulty of those sports because the competitors prepare themselves. They know who they're fighting and what their strengths are. In ESO, If you know you're going to duel a certain person who is going to use certain tactics, why not prepare?
It seems those criticizing Sabre dislike that he prepares himself while they remain predictable. That's their fault, not Sabre's. And this strategy seems lame to you ... well dueling might not be for you. (I don't blame you. Duels in this game detracted away from what I enjoyed the most: random, frantic pvp.)
The difference being that fighters can't train in such a way as to make the other guys punches hurt less, or so that their punches always land. There is a difference in that ESO dueling is more rock - paper - scissors than a straight up fight. A magic sorc is going to lose almost all the time against shieldbreaker etc... It isn't a great analogy. A boxer doesn't suddenly get a whole new skill set and a whole new fighting style and a whole new level of strength and speed to counter his opponent. He can't suddenly take punches that would have knocked him out before. He is still the same boxer, but he will use a different strategy. To compare it to changing skills and CP is like saying that a boxer morphs into a completely different person depending who he is fighting which is obviously not the case.