p_tsakirisb16_ESO wrote: »I see all these P2W tears, from the same people who were raging against subs.
Sallington wrote: »theweakminded wrote: »
Or, you know, they could stick to what they original said and just fill the shop with cosmetics. Mounts, costumes, etc.
There's no shortage of money to be made there I'm sure.
10% bonus to experience point gainESO+ only adds about 10%, the potions were going to add 50%, which is INSANE.
10% bonus to crafting research
10% bonus to crafting inspiration gain
10% bonus to gold acquisition
And it's ALL the time you have ESO+. It's more "P2W" than XP potions and CHEAPER!
your joking right? 10% is almost nothing, nice, but no where near P2W
those XP potions increased CP game by 50% before . There ARLEADY IS problems with CP differences in-game, those potions as they originally were, would basically mean, buy them and play A LOT or do not bother logging in.
theweakminded wrote: »Sallington wrote: »theweakminded wrote: »
Or, you know, they could stick to what they original said and just fill the shop with cosmetics. Mounts, costumes, etc.
There's no shortage of money to be made there I'm sure.
There is enough a shortage for them to look at things and decide to fix it. While I would prefer this handled differently, I think it is a good way to both make money and speed things up.
Note, they also spoke of adding convenience items. Saving time=convince. Mounts are a time sink (the gold is barely anything over a 6month period). There is a max and there is no direct combat bonus to mounts (time taken to travel, even in Cyrodiil is not a direct combat benefit).
10% is nothing, but 50% is p2w.your joking right? 10% is almost nothing, nice, but no where near P2W10% bonus to experience point gainESO+ only adds about 10%, the potions were going to add 50%, which is INSANE.
10% bonus to crafting research
10% bonus to crafting inspiration gain
10% bonus to gold acquisition
And it's ALL the time you have ESO+. It's more "P2W" than XP potions and CHEAPER!
This.processedmeatman wrote: »More like Pay to Run Away. Mounts don't win fights.
You must be confused with them saying that the crown store will have convenience items that will save players time. You know like not having to spend 180 days to max out your horse.Sallington wrote: »
Or, you know, they could stick to what they original said and just fill the shop with cosmetics. Mounts, costumes, etc.
There's no shortage of money to be made there I'm sure.
That's kind of how I feel. Ya, I might consider something like this or even speeding up crafting research as P2W, but you know what? The current mechanics are so bad that we kind of need it.
lordrichter wrote: »
The fix to long research times is not Crown Store, it is shorter research times.
This fix to 180 days to maximize horse training is not Crown Store, it is less time to maximize traning.
The fix to all game play issues happens to be fixing the game.
c.p.garrett1993_ESO wrote: »If this actually maxes out the stat and is priced fairly I may consider buying it.
Sallington wrote: »p_tsakirisb16_ESO wrote: »I see all these P2W tears, from the same people who were raging against subs.
I defended ZOS religiously when people were saying the game would go B2P/F2P. I thought "no way would they stray from the sub model. It's BY FAR the best model for quality content and support. They even said they would never go B2P/F2P for that very reason"
Now, here we are with the B2P cash store, and the game is going about as crappily as I would have expected with the B2P transition.
lordrichter wrote: »
The fix to long research times is not Crown Store, it is shorter research times.
This fix to 180 days to maximize horse training is not Crown Store, it is less time to maximize traning.
The fix to all game play issues happens to be fixing the game.
Sallington wrote: »p_tsakirisb16_ESO wrote: »I see all these P2W tears, from the same people who were raging against subs.
I defended ZOS religiously when people were saying the game would go B2P/F2P. I thought "no way would they stray from the sub model. It's BY FAR the best model for quality content and support. They even said they would never go B2P/F2P for that very reason"
Now, here we are with the B2P cash store, and the game is going about as crappily as I would have expected with the B2P transition.
I really think dropping the sub model was due to the console release and possible issues with that.
What makes me even more sad than ZOS' unscrupulous money-grabbing is the turn in the community from "never take my sub away" to "yay, more stuff in the crown store!"
Not long and everyone defending the old ways will have left, giving ZOS a free pass for total monetization. Once you're in, you never again climb out of the F2P-hole.
What makes me even more sad than ZOS' unscrupulous money-grabbing is the turn in the community from "never take my sub away" to "yay, more stuff in the crown store!"
Not long and everyone defending the old ways will have left, giving ZOS a free pass for total monetization. Once you're in, you never again climb out of the F2P-hole.
Which is what happened to every game I played that transitioned. The people that didn't like it left, and those that remained embraced the Cash Shop. Then, rather than the forums being clogged with multi-thread petitions against inevitability, you get glowing praise for the new set of Uber Flaming Shoulderpads of Awesomeness, and Sparkle Ponies.
What makes me even more sad than ZOS' unscrupulous money-grabbing is the turn in the community from "never take my sub away" to "yay, more stuff in the crown store!"
Not long and everyone defending the old ways will have left, giving ZOS a free pass for total monetization. Once you're in, you never again climb out of the F2P-hole.
Which is what happened to every game I played that transitioned. The people that didn't like it left, and those that remained embraced the Cash Shop. Then, rather than the forums being clogged with multi-thread petitions against inevitability, you get glowing praise for the new set of Uber Flaming Shoulderpads of Awesomeness, and Sparkle Ponies.
p_tsakirisb16_ESO wrote: »I see all these P2W tears, from the same people who were raging against subs.
Sallington wrote: »p_tsakirisb16_ESO wrote: »I see all these P2W tears, from the same people who were raging against subs.
I defended ZOS religiously when people were saying the game would go B2P/F2P. I thought "no way would they stray from the sub model. It's BY FAR the best model for quality content and support. They even said they would never go B2P/F2P for that very reason"
Now, here we are with the B2P cash store, and the game is going about as crappily as I would have expected with the B2P transition.
I really think dropping the sub model was due to the console release and possible issues with that.
no, it was because they refused or could not fix any of the major bugs, like laggy PVP, added little to no content, and then broke promise after promise while lieing to everyone.