@TehMagnus I am starting a new sorc and can't decide between Breton and Imperial. But since I am not a huge fan of light armor and destro staffs, what's your take on Imperial Sorcs?
@spoqster, Altmer, of course.@TehMagnus I am starting a new sorc and can't decide between Breton and Imperial. But since I am not a huge fan of light armor and destro staffs, what's your take on Imperial Sorcs?
Awhh guildieis nice to see.
Magnus do you play a sorc? Kind of presumptuous to negate peoples feelings with a sanctimonious post declaring that you are the official word on sorc skills. People feel like their class was changed for the worse, they have the right to declare that the same way you can look down on them from your high horse.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Talking strictly PVE.... what I can say is : MY sorc was destroyed.
Perhaps not all sorcs, maybe not your sorc, maybe not anyone's sorc, but this I don't care, I'm talking about MY sorc and MY sorc was destroyed.
In 1.5 it used to be able to sustain 900-1K DPS and to have an off heal in the 2nd bar, which was very much appreciated in many groups and compensated for the somewhat lower DPS.
In 1.6 with the same gear as 1.5 I died easily and achieved a ridiculous 4K DPS. So I looked and tried new gear, skills and so on... learned a completely new rotation, following new templates and tutorials, and finally manage some 8K-9K DPS, but this time WITHOUT an off-heal !! What use am I to a group now ? They're better off with another class. They don't reject me, I'm the one who refuses to be the useless one in a group. I only run normal daily pledges now, I don't join groups for vet dungeons, let alone trials. What sensible raid leader would seek a sorc now for trials ?
My sorc is not a lively thing, it's a virtual thing, still it's not a toolbox. I am really reluctant to have to *change* her to that extent and switch to a playstyle that is not "hers" (and that i don't enjoy playing). I *refuse* to use pets because they are absolutely ugly and because it makes no sense. Fighting Molag Bal and Oblivion badasses all game long for finally having to rely on your own "friendly" daedric slaves makes no sense at all. I also *refuse* to play a stamina sorc because that's not the type of character I wanted to play ! I want a magicka sorc !
You mention that all classes have to adapt. That's partly true, but from what I've noticed in my guilds, the effort and amount of change is 1/ less, far less than for sorcs. Most other classes just change their gear and don't even have to touch their skillbars 2/ more rewarding : after adjusting, they feel stronger than before. We magicka sorcs feel AT BEST the same as before. It's not fun to adjust and re-learn for... just the same (AT BEST).
I have a VR2 templar as well. I did not need any adjustments and feels stronger than before. BUT he's still in the leveling solo zones so it's not a valid comparison I guess. Still, I don't like to play him. I like my sorc, I want to play my magicka sorc.
If at least we could understand WHY it was changed so drastically ! Some aspects I understand (light armor protecting significantly less than medium or heavy is a change I understand and support, I also approve of not being able the re-up the ulti outside of combat) but most changes I don't understand at all : WHY was there a need to change the negate ?? why don't the crit matter any more ?? ...
I'm not arguing / demanding / threatening nor "QQing" as you like to name it; but as a matter of fact, MY sorc was destroyed, I don't feel any incentive for playing my "new" sorc, nor playing my templar, so for now I totally enjoy the justice system and the improved graphics of 1.6, BUT sooner or later I will probably log in less often and simply leave the game.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Look at the signatures of the loudest "sorcs are fine" people. They usually have a DK or NB, or multiple characters but prefer their DK.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
They hold up one skill or another and say "sorcs are fine because they have skill X." then skill X gets nerfed. That doesn't deter the anti-sorc brigadiers, they just shift the goalposts and come up with another skill that is the savior of sorcs.
The real issue here is that other classes hate losing to sorcs. Period. They would rather be killed by a talons spamming DK or an ambush spamming NB than a sorc because sorcs are supposed to be "squishy" and that translates to "always kill-able" in their minds.
Look at the signatures of the loudest "sorcs are fine" people. They usually have a DK or NB, or multiple characters but prefer their DK.
They don't want to let their investment lose value if another class becomes dominant so they brigade sorc threads and post misinformation to keep their DKs strong.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »The real issue here is that other classes hate losing to sorcs. Period. They would rather be killed by a talons spamming DK or an ambush spamming NB than a sorc because sorcs are supposed to be "squishy" and that translates to "always kill-able" in their minds.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Look at the signatures of the loudest "sorcs are fine" people. They usually have a DK or NB, or multiple characters but prefer their DK.
They don't want to let their investment lose value if another class becomes dominant so they brigade sorc threads and post misinformation to keep their DKs strong.
people like me who just go for the next OP thing will just quickly level up an alt if a class becomes more op than the other.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
Sallington wrote: »Anything useful that players are wanting added into the game all fall under the category of "Yer ruinin my 'mersion!"
people like me who just go for the next OP thing will just quickly level up an alt if a class becomes more op than the other.
Is the reason balance can never be achieved. Winning is the only thing that matters, actual class balance doesn't to you. Fundamental difference why you won't ever understand those that you feel are "QQ".
They are attached in an emotional way to the character they created, its not a win-at-any cost adapt survive. They take hours and hours to create a character and invest in it, when that investment is changed it upsets them.
You fail to understand this, nor have any sort of empathy for them.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
well if you lose the last reason to be picked for pve (negate) without any ground winning in other pve resorts you stay the most unused class for pve.
no matter if you call the loss a nerf or not - sorcs are garbage in pve if you are not joining the wrecking blow train.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
well if you lose the last reason to be picked for pve (negate) without any ground winning in other pve resorts you stay the most unused class for pve.
no matter if you call the loss a nerf or not - sorcs are garbage in pve if you are not joining the wrecking blow train.
In 1.5, you didn't need negate, you could use Nova after Nova and overheal every and any content with a good templar. With the new ultimate limitations, the fights lasting longer and the nerf to healing + removal of softcaps, sorcs are more needed than before. Negate Might be nerfed but it still removes *** from the ground.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
well if you lose the last reason to be picked for pve (negate) without any ground winning in other pve resorts you stay the most unused class for pve.
no matter if you call the loss a nerf or not - sorcs are garbage in pve if you are not joining the wrecking blow train.
In 1.5, you didn't need negate, you could use Nova after Nova and overheal every and any content with a good templar. With the new ultimate limitations, the fights lasting longer and the nerf to healing + removal of softcaps, sorcs are more needed than before. Negate Might be nerfed but it still removes *** from the ground.
Sallington wrote: »Anything useful that players are wanting added into the game all fall under the category of "Yer ruinin my 'mersion!"
Bfish22090 wrote: »Sorc crit surge cool down was nerfed, but it was buffed to have a spell power morph.
Sorcs have a great heal in the clanfear now
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
well if you lose the last reason to be picked for pve (negate) without any ground winning in other pve resorts you stay the most unused class for pve.
no matter if you call the loss a nerf or not - sorcs are garbage in pve if you are not joining the wrecking blow train.
In 1.5, you didn't need negate, you could use Nova after Nova and overheal every and any content with a good templar. With the new ultimate limitations, the fights lasting longer and the nerf to healing + removal of softcaps, sorcs are more needed than before. Negate Might be nerfed but it still removes *** from the ground.
sure it still removes *** from the ground but only once, the rest of the time you are "plagued" with a supbar DD or heal or an not even mentionable tank while the negate can be easily substituted by e.g. your allready mentioned Nova and gain a fully worthwhile healer, more DPS or a tough tank.
I don't disagree that they had been nerfed at one point, but the argument here is whether they were nerfed in 1.6 and the answer in my opinion is no.Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
They hold up one skill or another and say "sorcs are fine because they have skill X." then skill X gets nerfed. That doesn't deter the anti-sorc brigadiers, they just shift the goalposts and come up with another skill that is the savior of sorcs.
The real issue here is that other classes hate losing to sorcs. Period. They would rather be killed by a talons spamming DK or an ambush spamming NB than a sorc because sorcs are supposed to be "squishy" and that translates to "always kill-able" in their minds.
Look at the signatures of the loudest "sorcs are fine" people. They usually have a DK or NB, or multiple characters but prefer their DK.
They don't want to let their investment lose value if another class becomes dominant so they brigade sorc threads and post misinformation to keep their DKs strong.
That's why I stopped playing my NB too. I want the DW to not suck but sadly I feel like it really does. The AoE DPS with DW is just awful.
That comment makes me sad, because it's true.. my Stamina NB does not see much use at the moment.
I'm stubbornly sticking to DW because I can't stand the 2H "rotation" of WB -> HA -> WB -> HA -> WB, and still I can't really compete with that *sorry about the language* piece of ***.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Sorcs were nerfed. But there is a vocal minority that wants to keep sorcs nerfed. So they keep spreading this mis-information that "sorcs are fine" and obfuscating the entire conversations about the holistic sorc toolkit and the problems with it.
It's not actually a vocal minority, any decent player that knows how to play will tell you sorcs are not worse than they where before. Some will even say they where buffed.
well if you lose the last reason to be picked for pve (negate) without any ground winning in other pve resorts you stay the most unused class for pve.
no matter if you call the loss a nerf or not - sorcs are garbage in pve if you are not joining the wrecking blow train.
In 1.5, you didn't need negate, you could use Nova after Nova and overheal every and any content with a good templar. With the new ultimate limitations, the fights lasting longer and the nerf to healing + removal of softcaps, sorcs are more needed than before. Negate Might be nerfed but it still removes *** from the ground.
sure it still removes *** from the ground but only once, the rest of the time you are "plagued" with a supbar DD or heal or an not even mentionable tank while the negate can be easily substituted by e.g. your allready mentioned Nova and gain a fully worthwhile healer, more DPS or a tough tank.
Nova won't help you in 2nd boss of AA, it needs to be under the add and not under the party. Putting it down will negate the damage from the boss but won't negate the damage from the nullifier if he is outside of the Nova. A well placed negate will remove the AOE from nullfier though, that way the party doesn't have to move, and you don't waste DPS.
Just because something didn't work in 1.5 you can't just dismiss it in 1.6 and just because something worked in 1.5 doesn't mean it will in 1.6, especially not at the beginning.
Sorc the best class in pvp. Shield spam, up to 13k fragment dmg (or bit more) even to a heavy armor, 7k+ curse, streak spam, did i mentioned the übershield spam? 8k minespam dmg, chrushingshock animcancel to get fragment proc + umm shield spam and streak, and shield spam.....
The only sorc dies faster, is the one who dont have class shield. but DK who dont block and doesnt have GDB is weak and nerfed. Templar who has no heals on bar is nerfed. NB is bad anyway.
Magic build is OP compared to Stamina with any class. Why? Magic damage is out of control even for a weak nerfed sorc, i mentioned those insane crits. Wrecking blow can hit that too? Well only lucky ones, besida that:
you need stamina for:
Sneak, Block, Roll, Fart, Breath
you need magicka for:
Spam spam spam spam the huge dmg and you arent using stamina at all
If blocking magic would cost magicka, it would be better balanced, still magic dmg is out of controll
So a nerfed sorc need only spam the low cost class shield, can get away with streak spam, what can chain CC anyone, animcanceling attack makes average 10k fragment spam, 6k+ curse, or if anyone tries meele drop the 8k dmg mine, and i could continue the great abilities.
If thats the overnerfed sorc, then i want that ZoS overnerf all classes, to the level of sorcs.
Awhh guildieis nice to see.
Magnus do you play a sorc? Kind of presumptuous to negate peoples feelings with a sanctimonious post declaring that you are the official word on sorc skills. People feel like their class was changed for the worse, they have the right to declare that the same way you can look down on them from your high horse.
j.murro2ub17_ESO wrote: »Awhh guildieis nice to see.
Magnus do you play a sorc? Kind of presumptuous to negate peoples feelings with a sanctimonious post declaring that you are the official word on sorc skills. People feel like their class was changed for the worse, they have the right to declare that the same way you can look down on them from your high horse.
THIS
#1: I play with good sorcs, and they aren't complaining at all, I'm talking about people who rerolled DK in 1.5 to be OP and are playing sorc again.
#2: Stating that X or Y has been nerfed in a game that basically rebooted last week is a bit stupid IMO, I bet half the people complaining haven't even tried looking for new builds and ways to improve which is why the multiple sanctimonious posts declaring sorcs where nerfed annoy me.
#3: I am as entitled to make this kind of sanctimonious posts as much as the people making posts saying "Sorcs where nerfed again" since afaik, they aren't the official word on sorc skills either.
Everybody feels their class was changed for the worse except Templars (in the DPS department at least). Deal with it.
They aren't, they just require you to change your playstyle. It's just as if I said: DKs where nerfed because FOO is changed and now I cant solo stuff or do DSA. Guess what, I can, I just use other skillsrfennell_ESO wrote: »A lot of sorcs in the 1.5 world were forced to reroll to "useful" classes to raid.
So... a lot of sorcs pve experience was small scale dungeons or dsa or soloing stuff. In this particular way sorcs were seriously overnerfed as critical surge and it's morphs are far weaker than in 1.5 for this type of play.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »ps pppontus likely doesn't play his sorc much and I'd bet certainly doesn't and hasn't raided on a sorc. He just keeps claiming otherwise to offset his obvious dk bias. I guess he could post all his "on my sorc" leaderboard screenies but I'm betting they are all on his dk.
rfennell_ESO wrote: »Teh_magnus tries to pretend that his guild hadn't proclaimed they wouldn't bring sorcs to raids in 1.6. I'd love to see the many sorcs they bring along on their leaderboard runs.