I just ran around killing stuff using the mod, the first person view is so much more enjoyable now!
FezzikVizzini wrote: »I just ran around killing stuff using the mod, the first person view is so much more enjoyable now!
So, you totally trust a stand alone .exe to alter your client memory and do nothing else at all. You are quite sure of this ?
So - and I am not saying this exe does it - next time you run one of these things and it records your user id and password you will not complain will you.
I would NEVER trust something that is not an actual ADDON. You are asking for trouble - but hey. It's your call.
FezzikVizzini wrote: »I just ran around killing stuff using the mod, the first person view is so much more enjoyable now!
So, you totally trust a stand alone .exe to alter your client memory and do nothing else at all. You are quite sure of this ?
So - and I am not saying this exe does it - next time you run one of these things and it records your user id and password you will not complain will you.
I would NEVER trust something that is not an actual ADDON. You are asking for trouble - but hey. It's your call.
marcmyb14_ESO wrote: »FezzikVizzini wrote: »I just ran around killing stuff using the mod, the first person view is so much more enjoyable now!
So, you totally trust a stand alone .exe to alter your client memory and do nothing else at all. You are quite sure of this ?
So - and I am not saying this exe does it - next time you run one of these things and it records your user id and password you will not complain will you.
I would NEVER trust something that is not an actual ADDON. You are asking for trouble - but hey. It's your call.
If they didn't trust it or they thought it was doing anything else other than what it claims, they wouldn't allow it, obviously. So it's just you being paranoid, imo. If 49 virus scanners AND ZOS tells you it's safe, and you still don't trust it, you shouldn't even be using a computer. Who knows, you might actually be exposing your IP address when you go to a website!
I cant use higher fov in 3rd person... why on earth would anyone do it? I see people mentioning it.
I can see first(I dont play first person) but all higher fov does in third person is screw with my aiming by moving the crosshair. ><
I cant use higher fov in 3rd person... why on earth would anyone do it? I see people mentioning it.
I can see first(I dont play first person) but all higher fov does in third person is screw with my aiming by moving the crosshair. ><
marcmyb14_ESO wrote: »You haven't heard of VirusTotal? It's a website where you can upload a file it scans it on 50 different virus scanners. I don't keep an anti-virus on my computer at all. And do you honestly think they wouldn't check it for safety before OK'ing it? I'm afraid you are being
paranoid.
Sure, there's plenty of reason to be concerned about random exe's on the internet. But plenty of people have been using this for quite some time now and haven't reported any issues, so I'd say it's safe. That doesn't mean I wouldn't rather have an internal game slider, but since that's not an option right now, I'll take what I can get.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Apologies, everyone. We'll check on the status of this now.
Edit: Looks like the team took a close look, and we see no reason why you shouldn't be able to use this mod. Thanks for your patience while we looked into this, and enjoy!
I cant use higher fov in 3rd person... why on earth would anyone do it? I see people mentioning it.
I can see first(I dont play first person) but all higher fov does in third person is screw with my aiming by moving the crosshair. ><
elderscrollsb16_ESO109 wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno would it be possible for ZOS to post back the actual exe that you tested and which is safe.
This is in order to avoid that a hacker make a malicious version that people may use, thinking it's the "ZOS approved" one.
Edit: or if not possible, give use the file hash please
driosketch wrote: »Hassling the mod who enshrined an embarrassing post of yours because she found it amusing... "I too like to live dangerously"You gotta mark people like this @ZOS_GinaBruno to get them to see it.
(Sorry Gina, payback for the crossbow )
ArconSeptim wrote: »Well for me all addons are stupid and cheating tools, I play without them.
felixgamingx1 wrote: »
ThommyGunn wrote: »I've always been confused by the FoV missing complaint. In my settings, there is a slider right there under graphics, has been since early access. Its set 3/4's to the max. Is it missing from some? Do graphic card drivers or cards themselves need updated? Or is there to be a second FoV slider for something.
Again, its there for me and I can post a screenshot when I get home from work.
Just confused is all
In my opinion, any software that enhances or gives you an advantage in-game that isn't permitted by the API should be considered cheating.
I wouldn't consider a FOV cheating...
FOV just makes first person view better but 3rd person view will always be better than 1st person because you can see more.
FezzikVizzini wrote: »The exe we are talking about most likely does nothing more than check for the ESO image being in memory and then changes the address where the default FOV is stored. I dont know what that is but lets say it is 90.
The code will then change that address to another value.
Therefore, it is changing the value of an address in memory to some other value. Exactly like cheat engine does.
Now, a virus checker will scan a file and attempt to find code or patterns that match ones in its database. If it is not present in the database then it can't detect it. Simple as that.
Please tell me how any .exe that merely contains code that has the equivalent of
the following (and I am using pseudocode here - look it up) can be detected as malicious by a virus checker.
LOAD ESO.EXE startimage + 2096 100
LOAD ESO.EXE startimage + 4096 200
Exactly, it can't.
Or are you that brain dead that you think that Microsoft Essentials. Kapersky etc have taken this little .exe, looked at ESO (and good luck there as the client keeps changing) and analysed what the memory addresses being alterered actually do.
I suggest you get some basic computer knowledge before posting next time.
Oh, and by the way I never suggested that this did have anything wrong with it. If you could be bothered to read I merely pointed out that it was possible.
But, you didn't bother to read that.