Artmonger78 wrote: »If you are planning to sell the product worldwide, you should think globally and act accordingly. ZOS based in NA or EU is ad hominem.
You make no sense. So its a bad thing that they are based in NA, EU and Asia? And how is this an ad hominem? Them being based in other parts of the world is not irrelevant. Also how are they not thinking globally. There doing an update so people in other parts of the world can play when it is there time to play.
their..
they're..
Artmonger78 wrote: »If you are planning to sell the product worldwide, you should think globally and act accordingly. ZOS based in NA or EU is ad hominem.
You make no sense. So its a bad thing that they are based in NA, EU and Asia? And how is this an ad hominem? Them being based in other parts of the world is not irrelevant. Also how are they not thinking globally. There doing an update so people in other parts of the world can play when it is there time to play.
their..
they're..
Artmonger78 wrote: »If you are planning to sell the product worldwide, you should think globally and act accordingly. ZOS based in NA or EU is ad hominem.
You make no sense. So its a bad thing that they are based in NA, EU and Asia? And how is this an ad hominem? Them being based in other parts of the world is not irrelevant. Also how are they not thinking globally. There doing an update so people in other parts of the world can play when it is there time to play.
their..
they're..
there
*They're = They are*
What others like Microsoft do, localization of services. Since ZOS only have 2 major service zones (Megaservers as we all call it) it should not be harder than what other companies are doing for many years. It's a premium product, you can not make ppl stay if you act that way..
You really just compared a game company to a software giant. Blizzard has gotten away with it for ten years. EQ before then. Get over it.
I just hope that ZOS team is looking into this from a larger perspective.
The company does not need to be a software giant to see they need to adapt working hours for 2 different service zones.
elfindreams wrote: »Artmonger78 wrote: »If you are planning to sell the product worldwide, you should think globally and act accordingly. ZOS based in NA or EU is ad hominem.
You make no sense. So its a bad thing that they are based in NA, EU and Asia? And how is this an ad hominem? Them being based in other parts of the world is not irrelevant. Also how are they not thinking globally. There doing an update so people in other parts of the world can play when it is there time to play.
their..
they're..
there
*They're = They are*
Actually now that I look at it, you are both right... the original quote says "There doing an update so .... when it is there..." which should be "They're doing an update so ... when it is their..."
And to boot Microsoft really.They are full of problems when it comes to software.People been complaining for years about there software and the way they handle it
What others like Microsoft do, localization of services. Since ZOS only have 2 major service zones (Megaservers as we all call it) it should not be harder than what other companies are doing for many years. It's a premium product, you can not make ppl stay if you act that way..
You really just compared a game company to a software giant. Blizzard has gotten away with it for ten years. EQ before then. Get over it.
I just hope that ZOS team is looking into this from a larger perspective.
The company does not need to be a software giant to see they need to adapt working hours for 2 different service zones.
ZOS employs 250 people, Microsoft employs 100,932 people. You see the issue with what you just said?
What others like Microsoft do, localization of services. Since ZOS only have 2 major service zones (Megaservers as we all call it) it should not be harder than what other companies are doing for many years. It's a premium product, you can not make ppl stay if you act that way..
You really just compared a game company to a software giant. Blizzard has gotten away with it for ten years. EQ before then. Get over it.
I just hope that ZOS team is looking into this from a larger perspective.
The company does not need to be a software giant to see they need to adapt working hours for 2 different service zones.
ZOS employs 250 people, Microsoft employs 100,932 people. You see the issue with what you just said?
Ciinen1988 wrote: »I love how we decided to continue this thread rather than start another....lets see if there is a page limit
Or do we only have 3-4 hours? Now that's the Big questionMysticAura wrote: »I'd almost missed this thread. oh and there's a downtime defender.
200 pages would be a lofty goal, it took 14 hours to get to 110, and we only have 3-4 hours to make 200?
MysticAura wrote: »I'd almost missed this thread. oh and there's a downtime defender.
200 pages would be a lofty goal, it took 14 hours to get to 110, and we only have 3-4 hours to make 200?
WE WILL NOT BE SILENCEDCiinen1988 wrote: »I love how we decided to continue this thread rather than start another....lets see if there is a page limit
Or do we EVEN have 3-4 hours?Or do we only have 3-4 hours? Now that's the Big questionMysticAura wrote: »I'd almost missed this thread. oh and there's a downtime defender.
200 pages would be a lofty goal, it took 14 hours to get to 110, and we only have 3-4 hours to make 200?
kallistiGAD wrote: »I just love how everywhere I look there are just these fantastic landscapes.
I guess to many people can't count to 24.AmanitaMuscaria wrote: »Posting as speaking, So silly that still the world cant use real time 24h clock all around world. hope this brushed some one's "angry post" side :-)