FluffyBird wrote: »
We got Kevin
FluffyBird wrote: »
We got Kevin
Problem with that is last time we got a response on this thread from staff, other than just moderation, was almost two months ago.
I’m quite disappointed with the lack of response. Weren’t we told at the beginning of the year that they were going to communicate more? And now, they want to remove rumors of the forum? The rumors mill would probably be less active if we got more information and a general idea of where the game is going…
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
Bouldercleave wrote: »
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
I wonder if we'll get a 'State of ESO' update in January from Matt Firor?!?
I'm also wondering why @ZOS_Kevin hasn't updated us for several months?!? I just saw a video from Deltia last night made recently where even he is asking ZOS to please update us as to WHAT exactly the changes in U35 was meant to accomplish and what their long-term thoughts are for implementing it. It would be nice to get some official information- because when it comes to silence- it only feeds speculation, which isn't good.
I wonder if we'll get a 'State of ESO' update in January from Matt Firor?!?
I'm also wondering why @ZOS_Kevin hasn't updated us for several months?!? I just saw a video from Deltia last night made recently where even he is asking ZOS to please update us as to WHAT exactly the changes in U35 was meant to accomplish and what their long-term thoughts are for implementing it. It would be nice to get some official information- because when it comes to silence- it only feeds speculation, which isn't good.
All of this has me wondering if the "end of year 2022 wrap up" letter from Rich/Matt will come late next year?
We will likely get update letter from Matt before Christmas, a bit of mea culpa, a bit of teasing about what's coming in 2023, possibly acknowledging their plans and vision for the game overall, the end.
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
spartaxoxo wrote: »I personally think communication could be improved in the sense of making it easier to find. But, I actually do think the communication actually is generally comprehensive. And that often times, it's not that ZoS isn't communicating but rather that they are slow to fix issues, and they tend to solve things in ways that players don't really like. This results in their fixes needing to be fixed too.
A good example is the jabs change. We DID get communication on that, but they left the commentary pretty much buried in a pretty long patch note and didn't respond to any of the many threads. They also didn't give the community back old jabs. However, they explicitly did state why it was changed. The wanted to support weaving with jabs so they changed the attack cadence, and then they needed to change the animation to match it. It might not be what people would like to hear, but there was a specific concrete reason communicated to us.
I personally think they actually gave us a lot of communication surrounding U35, the problem with U35 to me is it's a bad patch. I hope U37 fixes it. And I am hoping that they either give us the Q&A soon, or just let people know an estimated time frame of when they'll be willing to talk about it. My guess would be around U37, but who knows. That's kind of just partially wishful thinking on my part since U36 had barely anything.
This reminds me that I think what people really want is engagement, not just communication. Yes, they often give answers as to why something was done, and probably honestly believe in some cases that it's sufficient. I can just HEAR some folks internally saying "well, we can't win. When we explain it is never good enough but when we are silent we are also criticized."
This is because when the community makes good, helpful points they want to feel that those points might be incorporated, if not immediately but at least in the future. And certainly directly acknowledged.
For example even though my character data is gone I still would like to see some of the assumed unintended consequences from AwA addressed, for the good of the game.
This to me is what is missing. They communicate often in great detail but rarely if ever directly acknowledge responses to those communications. So we are being communicated AT, as opposed to WITH, with a two-way back and forth. One-way communication is not engagement.
Then there is the other, tougher piece which is that what the community enjoys may not be the vision for the game. If the community would, say, prefer old jabs vs. easier weaving, due to nostalgia or animation quality or whatever, engagement would mean responses that clearly state the things we are feeling as a loss just aren't a priority. Difficult conversation but so much better than being outright ignored. Right now we get solutions that seem to ignore some sentiments, and some scenarios where more people's views COULD be incorporated into implementation but are not, and we have no idea of it is due to lack of resources or misalignment with vision or mistakes or what.
I wonder if we'll get a 'State of ESO' update in January from Matt Firor?!?
I'm also wondering why @ZOS_Kevin hasn't updated us for several months?!? I just saw a video from Deltia last night made recently where even he is asking ZOS to please update us as to WHAT exactly the changes in U35 was meant to accomplish and what their long-term thoughts are for implementing it. It would be nice to get some official information- because when it comes to silence- it only feeds speculation, which isn't good.