So I just made an alt, tried to make a cool outfit for him, but ALAS! No achievements, no dyes, no dice!
I guess my only counterpoint to this would be, by making everything account wide, that would leave very little for my alts to "earn" of their own merit.
Edit: I mean, with titles I agree with OP, because you can just not use titles you dont want your alt to have. I personally only use one title anyway, the rest are irrelevant to me. I also wouldnt use it on another character because I didnt earn it on them.
But with achievements I definitely disagree. I want to be able to track the progress of my alts separately.
This request comes up a lot, but at least you've made some reasonable arguments.
My other 17 characters didn't earn all those achievements, they earned their own by doing what they've individually done.
Tsar_Gekkou wrote: »This request comes up a lot, but at least you've made some reasonable arguments.
My other 17 characters didn't earn all those achievements, they earned their own by doing what they've individually done.
Well you could choose to not wear the titles on those characters until they do complete the achievement, while other people could choose otherwise. Problem solved.
Tsar_Gekkou wrote: »This request comes up a lot, but at least you've made some reasonable arguments.
My other 17 characters didn't earn all those achievements, they earned their own by doing what they've individually done.
Well you could choose to not wear the titles on those characters until they do complete the achievement, while other people could choose otherwise. Problem solved.
Hallothiel wrote: »Tsar_Gekkou wrote: »This request comes up a lot, but at least you've made some reasonable arguments.
My other 17 characters didn't earn all those achievements, they earned their own by doing what they've individually done.
Well you could choose to not wear the titles on those characters until they do complete the achievement, while other people could choose otherwise. Problem solved.
Better still, you could buy the title for your alt from the crown store if so desperate to have it without doing the content.
Tsar_Gekkou wrote: »Hallothiel wrote: »Tsar_Gekkou wrote: »This request comes up a lot, but at least you've made some reasonable arguments.
My other 17 characters didn't earn all those achievements, they earned their own by doing what they've individually done.
Well you could choose to not wear the titles on those characters until they do complete the achievement, while other people could choose otherwise. Problem solved.
Better still, you could buy the title for your alt from the crown store if so desperate to have it without doing the content.
If you have the title then you already did the content. I've never seen anyone with a title from something they've never did, unless you run into hackers.
I'm just going to wait until the OP provides the substantiation for claiming to know the basis on which most of us play different characters.
I'm just going to wait until the OP provides the substantiation for claiming to know the basis on which most of us play different characters.
And I'm going to wait until you provide the substantiation for the opposite. Maybe it's just a matter of perspective, but I've been playing MMOs for 20 years or so now, and I've NEVER met anyone who didn't have at least 1 alt.
Maybe we should start a poll ?
I'm just going to wait until the OP provides the substantiation for claiming to know the basis on which most of us play different characters.
And I'm going to wait until you provide the substantiation for the opposite. Maybe it's just a matter of perspective, but I've been playing MMOs for 20 years or so now, and I've NEVER met anyone who didn't have at least 1 alt.
Maybe we should start a poll ?
Please do not start a poll that will not help.
In reality, it is meaningless to know why most people play alts. It is irrelevant as we know a great many people do plat alts. We know this as a fact because Zos has been selling extra character slots for years, as many MMORPGs do.
Even if I see that a given character doesn't have master angler, but the account does, and decide to use master angler on that character anyway, still means that the achievement is meaningless on that character, and doesn't reflect its progression.
Even if I see that a given character doesn't have master angler, but the account does, and decide to use master angler on that character anyway, still means that the achievement is meaningless on that character, and doesn't reflect its progression.
That is a personal choice. If anything it is significantly less harmful than not having account-wide achievements.
Even if I see that a given character doesn't have master angler, but the account does, and decide to use master angler on that character anyway, still means that the achievement is meaningless on that character, and doesn't reflect its progression.
That is a personal choice. If anything it is significantly less harmful than not having account-wide achievements.
There is nothing 'harmful' with not having account-wide achievements.
Thechuckage wrote: »Maybe I'm an outlier, but I don't care about titles. Don't use em, don't intended to.
Achievements should be broadly account wide. As long as no perks are attached to the title, then what is the issue?
If you have a title that proclaims you are "the King of Hot **** and you can't back it up? Well it's going to be apparent real quick.
But something more benign, monster hunter. I probably have all the various pieces for that achieve, picked up on random characters. Some got lucky with a werewolf cameo, some the razored mandibles. But if the achieve was combined- BAM set complete.
As always, for those opposed, where is the harm? What does it matter if that particular character has never fished a day. Does it really harm you if they put a master angler title on? Really?
Thechuckage wrote: »Maybe I'm an outlier, but I don't care about titles. Don't use em, don't intended to.
Achievements should be broadly account wide. As long as no perks are attached to the title, then what is the issue?
If you have a title that proclaims you are "the King of Hot **** and you can't back it up? Well it's going to be apparent real quick.
But something more benign, monster hunter. I probably have all the various pieces for that achieve, picked up on random characters. Some got lucky with a werewolf cameo, some the razored mandibles. But if the achieve was combined- BAM set complete.
As always, for those opposed, where is the harm? What does it matter if that particular character has never fished a day. Does it really harm you if they put a master angler title on? Really?
yes, because others are seeing titles your character has not earned. People argue it is the player and not the character that earns the achievement. That isn't true. You can't earn that achievement without the character. It is a team effort, you and your character. You want the character to have the title that character needs to earn the title.
I wouldn't mind a tab that shows me achievements account wide. Multiple characters should not be able to work towards one achievement though. If you are trying to get the collectors achievements you shouldn't be able to find one trophy on one character and another trophy on a 2nd character and have both count towards the achievement. Each character needs to find all the trophies on their own.
MMO's survive by providing new content and having existing content be repeated. Achievements linked to characters instead of accounts is good for the long term health of the game. Give incentive to repeat content.
drzycki_ESO wrote: »I would also like to have account wide achievements. I get bored just playing one character and change around a lot and I love certain titles. Some of those titles can only be earned at once per year events. What about my new character that I made just after the event ended? I have to wait an entire year before I have a chance of getting it?