RodneyRegis wrote: »Is this after the changes? So dark elf is now a stam race?!
John_Falstaff wrote: »I frankly don't feel that high variance in khajiit parses is completely explained by the extra 8% of crit; if anything, such variance would be showing on live too for stamina khajiit builds (and I don't see such huge spread in my parses, even when I rely on axe bleed). On a small sample size like that (and not belittling @susmitds here, he'd done huge work and gave most insight than others on new state of things) some of that is just play of RNG that could have happened with any other race, but in this case did not.
@John_Falstaff
I feel that the variance can be decreased significantly with recovery enchants on jewelry or by using Bi-stat+recovery food. I was the Stamina NB DD for the tests and for every low DPS tests, the reason primarily tended to be not getting high crit rates, specifically more during the Major Force uptimes, after Incap Strike and during the execute phases. In Khajiit's case, in some cases, the initial two Major Force burn phases, resonated perfectly with the crits, DPS stayed high, and I went with low resource strain to the final phases. Some cases, the opposite happened causing the initial phases to last stages, forcing a heavy attack in the worst possible time of Major Force execution phase, which is a huge DPS loss.
For e.g, getting a 50k Bow Proc and 5 back to back 55k+ Killer's Blade during the final Major Force buffed execution phases is an incredible boost to DPS. There is also the chance of opposite with a heavy attack, non crit Bow proc and non-crit executes, wrecking the DPS results. Unlike Dunmer, Orc, Bosmer, Redguard or even Imperial, the only static damage increase passive for Khajiit Stamblade is 750 Stamina, which is significantly lesser than 2000 stamina or 250 weapon damage or both. This alone cannot make up for RNGesus failing me.
For magicka parses, the drain as well as the regen is higher, this creates a dynamic sustain condition, where parses tend to be more unforgiving (the primary reason why Breton is on top, as their passive significantly drops drain, instead of raising regen too much). Khajiit low sustain can cause standard deviation to be increase, which again gets affected by the resonance aspect previously mentioned.
In my solo tests, you will notice that deviation is significantly lower for Khajiit, as my parses are truly sustained by me with recovery food instead of relying on group, designed to last the entire parse, increasing the low parses. Also Major Force is not there to affect solo parses, which is the primary reason for some parses to hit those crazy highs compared to the rest, so Khajiit's high parses are lowered. Raising the floor and lowering the roof together keeps variance low. That's why, Dunmer ranks first in variance in solo parses, which is caused by sustain rather than RNG.
Would increasing Khajiit stam and mag sustain to 150 help with this while also not making them OP?
That is in my opinion the best option to stabilize Khajiit DPS. Take away the health regen, give Khajiit more breathing space for skill use. Also, it might even be needed to balance Khajiit for PvP, where 8% crit can become useless against the average guy with 3000 crit resist.
So you can switch if stamina builds become better or you are bored.Seraphayel wrote: »RodneyRegis wrote: »Is this after the changes? So dark elf is now a stam race?!
Yes, after the changes.
And no, Dark Elf is not a Stamina race, it's an excellent hybrid race for both Stamina and Magicka builds.
Thorstienn wrote: »Great job.
Was wondering what made Breton not excellent for Templar? I mean sustain is always good, and would think they would have the largest Mag pool for execute phase, this a larger jesus beam.
Thorstienn wrote: »Great job.
Was wondering what made Breton not excellent for Templar? I mean sustain is always good, and would think they would have the largest Mag pool for execute phase, this a larger jesus beam.
Simply, the fact that Khajiit got better parses on average. I didn't explicitly test this, but theoretical analysis, as well as tests from other players, some guild mates and friends tended to go this way.
It would be 100s difference taking averages. In live fights, variance comes into play and the difference can be much higherThorstienn wrote: »Great job.
Was wondering what made Breton not excellent for Templar? I mean sustain is always good, and would think they would have the largest Mag pool for execute phase, this a larger jesus beam.
Simply, the fact that Khajiit got better parses on average. I didn't explicitly test this, but theoretical analysis, as well as tests from other players, some guild mates and friends tended to go this way.
@susmitds
So for a StamWarden and a Stamblade... we are talking mere hundreds on dps differences between Khajiit, Dunmer and Redguard?
IronWooshu wrote: »IronWooshu wrote: »Hold your horses everyone.
Nord, Imperial and Argonian are not competing amongst DD, so in this regard they also don't need a buff.
You can't have tanking advantages and competitive DD roles at the same time.
The best end game tank play a Khajiit... Yes you read that right... a Khajiit... therefore tanking passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
"tanking advantages", good one.
I am glad to know that you are the authority to decide on who the best tank is.
Following your argument all racial passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things, which can also be derived from the OPs results.
In the end we are debating here about 3-5% performance in any role.
Pretty sure if you ask most people who the best tank is they would say Woeler as well, the dude has an entire website to tanking which I am sure every tank starting off has went to st some point for information.
https://woeler.eu/
I think you don't get the point here. My question is: would Woeler perform worse if he would chose Nord instead of Khajit?
You say tanking racials don't matter. I say, if tanking racials don't matter then no racials matter.
IronWooshu wrote: »IronWooshu wrote: »Hold your horses everyone.
Nord, Imperial and Argonian are not competing amongst DD, so in this regard they also don't need a buff.
You can't have tanking advantages and competitive DD roles at the same time.
The best end game tank play a Khajiit... Yes you read that right... a Khajiit... therefore tanking passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
"tanking advantages", good one.
I am glad to know that you are the authority to decide on who the best tank is.
Following your argument all racial passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things, which can also be derived from the OPs results.
In the end we are debating here about 3-5% performance in any role.
Pretty sure if you ask most people who the best tank is they would say Woeler as well, the dude has an entire website to tanking which I am sure every tank starting off has went to st some point for information.
https://woeler.eu/
I think you don't get the point here. My question is: would Woeler perform worse if he would chose Nord instead of Khajit?
You say tanking racials don't matter. I say, if tanking racials don't matter then no racials matter.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Lord_Dexter wrote: »Highly doubt especially on Altmers not being excellent, you are calling Breton excellent which lack 258 spell damage on theory so buffed 258 spell damage in group not performing even excellent?
Something wrong with you results.
Breton use a spell damage enchant, which gives them like 450 spell damage. They have so much sustain that they don't need a magicka absorb enchant, unlike Altmer, who do.
450 SD > 258 SD
Silver_Strider wrote: »
Tanking racials don't matter. If they did Nord wouldn't have been bottom tier in literally everything for years, being completely outstripped by every other race in practically everything.
Let's take your example and flip it for DPS or Healing; Would you perform worse for picking Nord instead of Khajiit. The answer is a big fat YES.
Seraphayel wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »So is the lynch mob going to calm down now, or are they just going to keep screaming bloody murder?
hmm I don't know.... Do you have magicka toons that are Dunmer? I do... ZOS creating an expense for me is kind of a *** move. We'll see what changes they'll make.
Oh, based on his analysis, Altmer is very good at magDPS but Breton is better.... Who the heck played Breton as magDPS in the end game community?
So for now, magDPS is mostly Breton except on magplar where Khajit would be better. The best damage magDPS, Dunmer, is now one of the best stam. Altmer, which was pretty much on par or barely lower than Dunmer as magDPS is very good but not the best. Orc, a race nobody ever played in PvE is now one of the best stam. Redguard, well, most stams were redguard and now Dunmer is more versatile...
I don't know. I love the changes but all I see here is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Hard to accept since it involves money. I keep saying that I wouldn't mind grinding another skills line, buying a chapter. I'd spend money to get content. The race-change thing costs real world money and those changes, although very fun, will probably make them a load of money but you have to wonder if this whole thing was intentional.
What I get right now is people who didn't min-max don't care and people who min-max are either cautious because changes can be made or pissed because they'll have to pay to race-change.
The difference between Altmer and Breton Magicka DPS is tiny, not even worth mentioning. The DPS difference is <500, in some cases it's just 200 DPS which is not even a 0.5% difference. This is almost perfect balancing. And there is still complaining that Breton might be better than Altmer for Magicka DPS? The difference between "best Magicka race" and "worst Magicka race" is ~ 1.5k DPS (~2.5%). It's hilarious that anybody considers race changes because of an average 1000 more or less DPS.
The meta barely changed, if at all.
- Khajiit & Dunmer are the most versatile races, excelling in both Magicka and Stamina
- All of the Magicka races are very close together
- All of the Stamina races are very close together
- Argonian, Imperials and Nord are "underperforming" DPS wise due to their nature of being better tank races
The only complaint that I can understand is about Imperials underperforming overall which can easily be fixed by a small buff. All the other racial changes are - surprise surprise - excellent when it comes to balance.
@CleymenZero Uum, I mentioned Major Force, which comes from Warhorn. There is 100% Uptime of Warhorn with 38 secs of Major Force uptime as I mentioned in the test.CleymenZero wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »CleymenZero wrote: »So is the lynch mob going to calm down now, or are they just going to keep screaming bloody murder?
hmm I don't know.... Do you have magicka toons that are Dunmer? I do... ZOS creating an expense for me is kind of a *** move. We'll see what changes they'll make.
Oh, based on his analysis, Altmer is very good at magDPS but Breton is better.... Who the heck played Breton as magDPS in the end game community?
So for now, magDPS is mostly Breton except on magplar where Khajit would be better. The best damage magDPS, Dunmer, is now one of the best stam. Altmer, which was pretty much on par or barely lower than Dunmer as magDPS is very good but not the best. Orc, a race nobody ever played in PvE is now one of the best stam. Redguard, well, most stams were redguard and now Dunmer is more versatile...
I don't know. I love the changes but all I see here is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Hard to accept since it involves money. I keep saying that I wouldn't mind grinding another skills line, buying a chapter. I'd spend money to get content. The race-change thing costs real world money and those changes, although very fun, will probably make them a load of money but you have to wonder if this whole thing was intentional.
What I get right now is people who didn't min-max don't care and people who min-max are either cautious because changes can be made or pissed because they'll have to pay to race-change.
The difference between Altmer and Breton Magicka DPS is tiny, not even worth mentioning. The DPS difference is <500, in some cases it's just 200 DPS which is not even a 0.5% difference. This is almost perfect balancing. And there is still complaining that Breton might be better than Altmer for Magicka DPS? The difference between "best Magicka race" and "worst Magicka race" is ~ 1.5k DPS (~2.5%). It's hilarious that anybody considers race changes because of an average 1000 more or less DPS.
The meta barely changed, if at all.
- Khajiit & Dunmer are the most versatile races, excelling in both Magicka and Stamina
- All of the Magicka races are very close together
- All of the Stamina races are very close together
- Argonian, Imperials and Nord are "underperforming" DPS wise due to their nature of being better tank races
The only complaint that I can understand is about Imperials underperforming overall which can easily be fixed by a small buff. All the other racial changes are - surprise surprise - excellent when it comes to balance.
It says raid buff but there's no Warhorn. If Khajit is very close or the same on the dummy, that 8% crit with good Warhorn uptime will shoot it forward. In long fights, Breton will win hands down if they are close to altmer on the dummy.
This is great data and I admit that the changes are great. The fact that, if you want to adjust to meta, it is tied to real world money is freaking annoying.
I wouldn't complain if they had, let's say, à token pack of 6 for 6k or they included 5-6 token with the prepurchase of Elsweyr but I'm annoyed but the monetary implications.
I know they're here to make money but the changes to the meta I've seen (playing since Morrowind) , as small as they were, never implicated real world money. This is different. Knowing the changes would happen, I would've chosen different races for almost all of my 14 toons. I had a Breton magsorc that I used for pvp. Ended up race-changing for argonian because sustain is king in pvp. Well Breton looks like it will have better sustain and damage so I wouldn't have bothered switching.
I have a Dunmer magwarden, with that fire damage and double fire staves, my damage was really good. It is still going to perform very well but it would perform better being another race. They were chosen because they had an edge, not because I liked Dunmers.
I don't know, I love the changes and love to see that it is way more balanced now as far as races go. I'm just annoyed because I wouldn't have picked this race for this class and this other race for this other class and if I want to change well, spit out the cash.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Lord_Dexter wrote: »Lord_Dexter wrote: »Highly doubt especially on Altmers not being excellent, you are calling Breton excellent which lack 258 spell damage on theory so buffed 258 spell damage in group not performing even excellent?
Something wrong with you results.
Infused Berserker enchantment+100 mag recovery+8% cost reduction > 200 conditional regen+Infused Absorb Stamina.
He gave breton 10 and altmer 9 which is virtually the same in practice.
Can not agree with you,
258 SD of Altmers is either not working or worth nothing as per you?
In group buff no doubt Altmers surpass Breton.
Do you not understand how enchantments work?
Silver_Strider wrote: »IronWooshu wrote: »IronWooshu wrote: »Hold your horses everyone.
Nord, Imperial and Argonian are not competing amongst DD, so in this regard they also don't need a buff.
You can't have tanking advantages and competitive DD roles at the same time.
The best end game tank play a Khajiit... Yes you read that right... a Khajiit... therefore tanking passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
"tanking advantages", good one.
I am glad to know that you are the authority to decide on who the best tank is.
Following your argument all racial passives mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things, which can also be derived from the OPs results.
In the end we are debating here about 3-5% performance in any role.
Pretty sure if you ask most people who the best tank is they would say Woeler as well, the dude has an entire website to tanking which I am sure every tank starting off has went to st some point for information.
https://woeler.eu/
I think you don't get the point here. My question is: would Woeler perform worse if he would chose Nord instead of Khajit?
You say tanking racials don't matter. I say, if tanking racials don't matter then no racials matter.
Tanking racials don't matter. If they did Nord wouldn't have been bottom tier in literally everything for years, being completely outstripped by every other race in practically everything.
Let's take your example and flip it for DPS or Healing; Would you perform worse for picking Nord instead of Khajiit. The answer is a big fat YES.
You know what's going to happen, Nords are going to be pushed into healers for warhorn while Redguards become the defacto #1 tank race due to that unbelievable sustain which will allow them to essentially permablock especially when their skill cost is reduced by so much.Silver_Strider wrote: »
Tanking racials don't matter. If they did Nord wouldn't have been bottom tier in literally everything for years, being completely outstripped by every other race in practically everything.
Let's take your example and flip it for DPS or Healing; Would you perform worse for picking Nord instead of Khajiit. The answer is a big fat YES.
Let me clear things out things out a bit.
Lets see the effect of a good tanking race on average parses with Warhorn.
Nord Ultimate gen passive = 0.5
Ultimate from replacing Resist sets with Bloodspawn = 1.2 Avg
Khajiit Tank ultigen - 3.6 give or take (Taking base regen and Minor Heroism with high uptime into account)
Nord Tank ultigen - 3.6+0.5+1.2 = 5.3
Khajiit Major Force Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/3.6) * 9.5 = 82 secs approx
Nord Major Force Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/5.3) * 9.5 = 120 secs approx
Khajiit Stat Boost Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/3.6) * 30 = 260 secs approx
Nord Stat Boost Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/5.3) * 30 = 381 secs approx
Major Force = 10% boost to DPS approx on average
Stat Boost = 2%-5% boost to DPS approx on average = 3.5%
Let's consider 8 DPS doing 60K DPS without Warhorn.
Total unboosted DPS = 480k
Khajiit Tank DPS Boost = 480000*0.1*82/600+480000*0.035*260/600 = 13840
Nord Tank DPS Boost = 480000*0.1*120/600+480000*0.035*381/600 = 20268
That's 6.5K more DPS that a single Nord can indirectly add to a group. The value may change either lesser or greater, but it will always be there.
Which do you think is more valuable, 1K direct DPS or 6.5K indirect DPS to group along with sustain benefits of higher resource reserve uptime?
Also considering, BiS tanks are DKs, the ultimate gen also converts to higher sustain.
Sure, tanking cannot be objectively compared, but it can always be subjectively compared.
IronWooshu wrote: »You know what's going to happen, Nords are going to be pushed into healers for warhorn while Redguards become the defacto #1 tank race due to that unbelievable sustain which will allow them to essentially permablock especially when their skill cost is reduced by so much.Silver_Strider wrote: »
Tanking racials don't matter. If they did Nord wouldn't have been bottom tier in literally everything for years, being completely outstripped by every other race in practically everything.
Let's take your example and flip it for DPS or Healing; Would you perform worse for picking Nord instead of Khajiit. The answer is a big fat YES.
Let me clear things out things out a bit.
Lets see the effect of a good tanking race on average parses with Warhorn.
Nord Ultimate gen passive = 0.5
Ultimate from replacing Resist sets with Bloodspawn = 1.2 Avg
Khajiit Tank ultigen - 3.6 give or take (Taking base regen and Minor Heroism with high uptime into account)
Nord Tank ultigen - 3.6+0.5+1.2 = 5.3
Khajiit Major Force Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/3.6) * 9.5 = 82 secs approx
Nord Major Force Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/5.3) * 9.5 = 120 secs approx
Khajiit Stat Boost Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/3.6) * 30 = 260 secs approx
Nord Stat Boost Uptime per 10 minutes - 600/(250/5.3) * 30 = 381 secs approx
Major Force = 10% boost to DPS approx on average
Stat Boost = 2%-5% boost to DPS approx on average = 3.5%
Let's consider 8 DPS doing 60K DPS without Warhorn.
Total unboosted DPS = 480k
Khajiit Tank DPS Boost = 480000*0.1*82/600+480000*0.035*260/600 = 13840
Nord Tank DPS Boost = 480000*0.1*120/600+480000*0.035*381/600 = 20268
That's 6.5K more DPS that a single Nord can indirectly add to a group. The value may change either lesser or greater, but it will always be there.
Which do you think is more valuable, 1K direct DPS or 6.5K indirect DPS to group along with sustain benefits of higher resource reserve uptime?
Also considering, BiS tanks are DKs, the ultimate gen also converts to higher sustain.
Sure, tanking cannot be objectively compared, but it can always be subjectively compared.
Asides the enviable of what I explained that ultimate regen is a joke being based off taking damage rather than just being in combat. If they made it when in combat it would work better for DPS and Healing roles especially the latter since we all know where Nords are gonna be pidgeon holed into.
This BiS tank talk is not the case when Redguard is way better.
John_Falstaff wrote: »I frankly don't feel that high variance in khajiit parses is completely explained by the extra 8% of crit; if anything, such variance would be showing on live too for stamina khajiit builds (and I don't see such huge spread in my parses, even when I rely on axe bleed). On a small sample size like that (and not belittling @susmitds here, he'd done huge work and gave most insight than others on new state of things) some of that is just play of RNG that could have happened with any other race, but in this case did not.