@Abysswarrior45
So every skill that preforms in a way i.e spam is the same so pretty much you stated that venom claw is the same as surprise attack. Yup this discussion here is showing how much of a waste this is.
Mag DKs PvE numbers come from molten whip like you seriously do not play a Mag DK, making molten whip into a stam whip would cripple their PvE numbers but it's ok to disregard that because you don't play one right.
Stam whip would be a spam-able therefore it makes Stam DK relevant? Lol but didn't you just state that all skills that act the same way are similar e.g what you said about my proposed fragmented shield change. You then try to say "but what about proc set Zaan" again I've said it a-lot through this thread, DO NOT USE A SET TO JUSTIFY YOUR PRECONCEIVED NOTION(S), KTHX.
Taking flame lash is also again a NO that belongs to their PvP aspect but see you just wanna steal things from the DK class without thinking of something unique and it's funny you throw around the word 'unique' rather flippantly through-out this back n forth but clearly do not understand what 'unique' means.
Stam DK doesn't "Definitely need major mending" like what? You state you play DK in PvP well if you feel you need major mending as a DK in PvP then you are most certainly a bad DK like woah. You also fail to realize major mending remains on Igneous shield and I've said to bring back the duration to that morph while changing fragmented shield into my idea or something offensive for Stamina DK.
Regarding your last comment, Ofc I'd ask because you don't seem to be one who has played this class a lot or has some kind of in-depth out look for this class. You talk about unique changes but in the next breath talk about taking one morph and making it stamina like woah that's a lot of creativity there chief, don't kid yourself mate. You one disregard one class saying they don't need X then in the next breath state molten whip wouldn't screw their DPS which is their main skill as a Mag DK DPS.
@Abysswarrior45
So every skill that preforms in a way i.e spam is the same so pretty much you stated that venom claw is the same as surprise attack. Yup this discussion here is showing how much of a waste this is.
Mag DKs PvE numbers come from molten whip like you seriously do not play a Mag DK, making molten whip into a stam whip would cripple their PvE numbers but it's ok to disregard that because you don't play one right.
Stam whip would be a spam-able therefore it makes Stam DK relevant? Lol but didn't you just state that all skills that act the same way are similar e.g what you said about my proposed fragmented shield change. You then try to say "but what about proc set Zaan" again I've said it a-lot through this thread, DO NOT USE A SET TO JUSTIFY YOUR PRECONCEIVED NOTION(S), KTHX.
Taking flame lash is also again a NO that belongs to their PvP aspect but see you just wanna steal things from the DK class without thinking of something unique and it's funny you throw around the word 'unique' rather flippantly through-out this back n forth but clearly do not understand what 'unique' means.
Stam DK doesn't "Definitely need major mending" like what? You state you play DK in PvP well if you feel you need major mending as a DK in PvP then you are most certainly a bad DK like woah. You also fail to realize major mending remains on Igneous shield and I've said to bring back the duration to that morph while changing fragmented shield into my idea or something offensive for Stamina DK.
Regarding your last comment, Ofc I'd ask because you don't seem to be one who has played this class a lot or has some kind of in-depth out look for this class. You talk about unique changes but in the next breath talk about taking one morph and making it stamina like woah that's a lot of creativity there chief, don't kid yourself mate. You one disregard one class saying they don't need X then in the next breath state molten whip wouldn't screw their DPS which is their main skill as a Mag DK DPS.
Stamspammable:
Stamina whip, high damage single target noxious breath are the only skills i can think of which can become this.
No earthen heart abilities as we still have the helping hands passive which is a problem with cost reduction and overall cost of the skill.
Stamspammable:
Stamina whip, high damage single target noxious breath are the only skills i can think of which can become this.
No earthen heart abilities as we still have the helping hands passive which is a problem with cost reduction and overall cost of the skill.
New Psijik skill - Imbue Weapons (stamina morf) which is spammable, actually remove the need of stamwhip actually, but burst heal with stamina cost could be very nice thing for stamdk, like at least crap dragon blood but for stamina
Abysswarrior45 wrote: »@Abysswarrior45
So every skill that preforms in a way i.e spam is the same so pretty much you stated that venom claw is the same as surprise attack. Yup this discussion here is showing how much of a waste this is.
Mag DKs PvE numbers come from molten whip like you seriously do not play a Mag DK, making molten whip into a stam whip would cripple their PvE numbers but it's ok to disregard that because you don't play one right.
What? No... your reading comprehension skills are awful. Reread what I said.Stam whip would be a spam-able therefore it makes Stam DK relevant? Lol but didn't you just state that all skills that act the same way are similar e.g what you said about my proposed fragmented shield change. You then try to say "but what about proc set Zaan" again I've said it a-lot through this thread, DO NOT USE A SET TO JUSTIFY YOUR PRECONCEIVED NOTION(S), KTHX.
Zaan is a significant boost to mag dk single target dps is all I'm saying. Them switching to flame lash as their molten whip substitute if molten whip were stam wouldn't cripple their numbers by huge amounts. You can pump out 35-39k dps self buffed without molten whip currently, js.Taking flame lash is also again a NO that belongs to their PvP aspect but see you just wanna steal things from the DK class without thinking of something unique and it's funny you throw around the word 'unique' rather flippantly through-out this back n forth but clearly do not understand what 'unique' means.
You really are a drama queen. "Steal" and "cripple" sets quite the tone in your bickering response. Whip is unique to the Dragonknight class in general, fact...Stam DK doesn't "Definitely need major mending" like what? You state you play DK in PvP well if you feel you need major mending as a DK in PvP then you are most certainly a bad DK like woah. You also fail to realize major mending remains on Igneous shield and I've said to bring back the duration to that morph while changing fragmented shield into my idea or something offensive for Stamina DK.
In other words stam dk sacrifices major mending for your fragmented shield stam morph right? Therefore major mending is lost. If that wasn't the case I said keeping mending on your suggested morph was too much for one skill. Thats imbalanced as hell especially when you include earthen heart passives.Regarding your last comment, Ofc I'd ask because you don't seem to be one who has played this class a lot or has some kind of in-depth out look for this class. You talk about unique changes but in the next breath talk about taking one morph and making it stamina like woah that's a lot of creativity there chief, don't kid yourself mate. You one disregard one class saying they don't need X then in the next breath state molten whip wouldn't screw their DPS which is their main skill as a Mag DK DPS.
Check my Youtube, Abyss ESO.Something tells me you're the kind of person who HATES people who don't agree with you and pretend the sky is falling. I speak as a DK main be it mag or stam. I can perform on both.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
@Abysswarrior45
You talk about reading comprehension skills but clearly that's projection based on the responses to each individual part you just gave.
You state I'm being a 'drama queen' because I stated a fact i.e you changing the morph of something that is greatly used for PvE or PvP would cripple and it is stealing. You seem to think that it is fine so do me a favor and make a post on general discussion about how you would take one of the morphs because you want a stamina whip since you can't think of anything unique.
Regarding my fragmented shield change uh no? I never said anything about having major mending on there so again don't put words in my mouth, I concisely presented a whole new ability.I also stated that the ability would be magicka and would scale with highest resource/weapon damage of stamina + be changed to either poison or physical damage; Which one of us has a reading problem... clearly that was projection lol.
Touching back on that Stam whip comparison to surprise attack, you stated that fragmented shield delayed burst is the same as warden and therefore it isn't unique so that same talking point would translate over to surprise attack because it is a spam-able and therefore would be considered the same under your 'logic'. So again yeah you invalidated your stamina whip comment by making that statement right there.
I could care less of your Youtube channel, anyone who states that Mag DKs should lose their whip that a large portion of them use just because us Stamina DKs want a spam-able clearly can't find anything unique other than "Oh look that works for them so let's have that".
People who don't agree with me are fine but people like yourself who act that we need to steal something a lot of Mag DKs use just to fit their own benefit while championing this "it'll be unique" mentality, clearly lack anything constructive let alone creative to bring to the table.
Abysswarrior45 wrote: »@Abysswarrior45
You talk about reading comprehension skills but clearly that's projection based on the responses to each individual part you just gave.
You state I'm being a 'drama queen' because I stated a fact i.e you changing the morph of something that is greatly used for PvE or PvP would cripple and it is stealing. You seem to think that it is fine so do me a favor and make a post on general discussion about how you would take one of the morphs because you want a stamina whip since you can't think of anything unique.
Regarding my fragmented shield change uh no? I never said anything about having major mending on there so again don't put words in my mouth, I concisely presented a whole new ability.I also stated that the ability would be magicka and would scale with highest resource/weapon damage of stamina + be changed to either poison or physical damage; Which one of us has a reading problem... clearly that was projection lol.
Touching back on that Stam whip comparison to surprise attack, you stated that fragmented shield delayed burst is the same as warden and therefore it isn't unique so that same talking point would translate over to surprise attack because it is a spam-able and therefore would be considered the same under your 'logic'. So again yeah you invalidated your stamina whip comment by making that statement right there.
I could care less of your Youtube channel, anyone who states that Mag DKs should lose their whip that a large portion of them use just because us Stamina DKs want a spam-able clearly can't find anything unique other than "Oh look that works for them so let's have that".
People who don't agree with me are fine but people like yourself who act that we need to steal something a lot of Mag DKs use just to fit their own benefit while championing this "it'll be unique" mentality, clearly lack anything constructive let alone creative to bring to the table.
Once again, reread what I said. I didn't put any words in your mouth. People have been asking for a stam whip for a long time and that leads me to believe you're outnumbered on the opinion of whether or not it should be added. Such a small change that could make a huge difference for all the stam dks out there.
@Anti_Virus
You can have that opinion regarding both of them but like I said do me a favor and make a post on general discussion championing how Mag DKs don't need their molten whip or lava whip. You both feel this is a minority opinion when it's completely the opposite. Check out plenty of Mag DK PvE builds by your favorite streamers and I bet they all have molten whip slotted. Check out all Mag DK PvP builds by your favorite streamers and I bet they all have lava whip slotted.
Molten whip increases your damage per ardent flame skills on your bar, that ability acts as their main form of DPS aside from DoTs in their rotation.
Lava whip heals you when you set a target off balance and in PvP all Mag DKs or a siginifncantly high population of them utilize soft/hard cc so they can proc flame lash to sustain their health while dealing damage.
Regarding frag shield, (like I said somewhere through-out this thread) I do not want some added duration to one skill but rather a unique ability that is something different; Hence why I laid out my own take on it while keeping true to heart of what makes a Dragon Knight a Dragon Knight.
The change hasn't even gone through yet and I have also stated it needs to be different but at the same time Igneous shield should get it's original duration back for the sake of being more of a supportive skill (Mag DK vet trial healer here) while fragmented should be the offensive.
lucky_Sage wrote: »@MaxwellC
for wings costin stamina it make almost usless for magicka they need stam way more the stam needs magicka a magdk would be better off going 2h and forward momentum it would cost less stam and last longer. as a magicka toon I wouldn't spend more than 3k stamina on a abilty I need to stam for cc break way more.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
@Anti_Virus
Honestly I don't agree with any of them aside for hardened armor and tepidly the scaled passive change/elder dragon change but that hardened armor change would be extremely lackluster and still wouldn't be used in comparison to volatile armor as it actually does something worth its use e.g. finding stealth enemies, or applying a DoT.
AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
https://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43sAddictionX wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
He will. Useless stamina whip feedback is suffocating the thread. Starts @ 01:02:40ishhttps://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43s
To be honest, these very same people is why we DO NOT GET BUFFS!!!! STOP IT!!! Your constant input for a stamina whip is counterproductive as its been since that update. No wonder you guys believe he they won't listen to you. Cause you are asking for the impossible.
Every stamina whip supporter must listen to his words in that video .... I WAS THERE WATCHING!
Q: Will Dragonknight EVER receive a stamina version of flame lash or molten whip?
A: ". . . . So, In general, I don't think that's something we want to do."- Wrobel
AOE caps was recently removed and guess what it took a COMMUNITY WIDE EFFORT to even get that DONE WITH OVER 2 YEARS of constant resistance/bugs/updates/fixes. Do you really believe the few people who play DK since the beginning will be able to get that kind of support?!
Abysswarrior45 wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
He will. Useless stamina whip feedback is suffocating the thread. Starts @ 01:02:40ishhttps://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43s
To be honest, these very same people is why we DO NOT GET BUFFS!!!! STOP IT!!! Your constant input for a stamina whip is counterproductive as its been since that update. No wonder you guys believe he they won't listen to you. Cause you are asking for the impossible.
Every stamina whip supporter must listen to his words in that video .... I WAS THERE WATCHING!
Q: Will Dragonknight EVER receive a stamina version of flame lash or molten whip?
A: ". . . . So, In general, I don't think that's something we want to do."- Wrobel
AOE caps was recently removed and guess what it took a COMMUNITY WIDE EFFORT to even get that DONE WITH OVER 2 YEARS of constant resistance/bugs/updates/fixes. Do you really believe the few people who play DK since the beginning will be able to get that kind of support?!
Yes I do. We'll keep asking for another 2 years and believe it or not, the majority of dks want the stam whip.
Abysswarrior45 wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
He will. Useless stamina whip feedback is suffocating the thread. Starts @ 01:02:40ishhttps://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43s
To be honest, these very same people is why we DO NOT GET BUFFS!!!! STOP IT!!! Your constant input for a stamina whip is counterproductive as its been since that update. No wonder you guys believe he they won't listen to you. Cause you are asking for the impossible.
Every stamina whip supporter must listen to his words in that video .... I WAS THERE WATCHING!
Q: Will Dragonknight EVER receive a stamina version of flame lash or molten whip?
A: ". . . . So, In general, I don't think that's something we want to do."- Wrobel
AOE caps was recently removed and guess what it took a COMMUNITY WIDE EFFORT to even get that DONE WITH OVER 2 YEARS of constant resistance/bugs/updates/fixes. Do you really believe the few people who play DK since the beginning will be able to get that kind of support?!
Yes I do. We'll keep asking for another 2 years and believe it or not, the majority of dks want the stam whip.
Abysswarrior45 wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
He will. Useless stamina whip feedback is suffocating the thread. Starts @ 01:02:40ishhttps://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43s
To be honest, these very same people is why we DO NOT GET BUFFS!!!! STOP IT!!! Your constant input for a stamina whip is counterproductive as its been since that update. No wonder you guys believe he they won't listen to you. Cause you are asking for the impossible.
Every stamina whip supporter must listen to his words in that video .... I WAS THERE WATCHING!
Q: Will Dragonknight EVER receive a stamina version of flame lash or molten whip?
A: ". . . . So, In general, I don't think that's something we want to do."- Wrobel
AOE caps was recently removed and guess what it took a COMMUNITY WIDE EFFORT to even get that DONE WITH OVER 2 YEARS of constant resistance/bugs/updates/fixes. Do you really believe the few people who play DK since the beginning will be able to get that kind of support?!
Yes I do. We'll keep asking for another 2 years and believe it or not, the majority of dks want the stam whip.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
If you are asking for a stamina morph of whip, you don't really understand how the stamdk works.
Ragnarock41 wrote: »Abysswarrior45 wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »AddictionX wrote: »Repeat after me.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
WILL NOT.
GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
one more time.
Wrobel Said He WILL NOT GIVE US A STAMINA WHIP.
Good! Leave my Molten Whip alone!
He will. Useless stamina whip feedback is suffocating the thread. Starts @ 01:02:40ishhttps://youtu.be/UBKT-Fu_B0A?t=1h2m43s
To be honest, these very same people is why we DO NOT GET BUFFS!!!! STOP IT!!! Your constant input for a stamina whip is counterproductive as its been since that update. No wonder you guys believe he they won't listen to you. Cause you are asking for the impossible.
Every stamina whip supporter must listen to his words in that video .... I WAS THERE WATCHING!
Q: Will Dragonknight EVER receive a stamina version of flame lash or molten whip?
A: ". . . . So, In general, I don't think that's something we want to do."- Wrobel
AOE caps was recently removed and guess what it took a COMMUNITY WIDE EFFORT to even get that DONE WITH OVER 2 YEARS of constant resistance/bugs/updates/fixes. Do you really believe the few people who play DK since the beginning will be able to get that kind of support?!
Yes I do. We'll keep asking for another 2 years and believe it or not, the majority of dks want the stam whip.
The way I look at it, They either need to give stamina whip, or give us abilities similar to hurricane or crit surge, so that we can have easier time using dizzying swing/flurry. Stamina whip is not the only way to make Dks viable again, but It would be a very good step to get rid of SnB on literally every build.
CrazYDunm3r wrote: »I will really miss my empowered ult from chains as MagDK. For me empower was just fine, also for other classes.