I'm still trying to process people telling Xylena she needs to L2P...
Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
So if all other option are somehow limited and skoria outperforms then on stamina and magica builds alike because it does not share those or other limitations:
Isn´t that the definition of overperforming when compared to other proccdmg sets?
It's fine as is. Learn to listen and watch what's going on and get better at the game rather than asking for zos to make it easier for you. You guys will still get beat up by anyone half decent.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
So if all other option are somehow limited and skoria outperforms then on stamina and magica builds alike because it does not share those or other limitations:
Isn´t that the definition of overperforming when compared to other proccdmg sets?
So are you saying skoria outperforms selene, stormfist and every other monster set or are you saying skoria outperforms "stamina monster sets" on magicka builds/ "magicka monster sets" on stamina builds?
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
So if all other option are somehow limited and skoria outperforms then on stamina and magica builds alike because it does not share those or other limitations:
Isn´t that the definition of overperforming when compared to other proccdmg sets?
So are you saying skoria outperforms selene, stormfist and every other monster set or are you saying skoria outperforms "stamina monster sets" on magicka builds/ "magicka monster sets" on stamina builds?
I´m saying that skoria outperforms any other offensive monsterset - when you meet procc conditions (which are only really hard to meet for stamblade, magsorc and warden).
It´s just not even a contest: If you want sth offensive you go for skoria - nothing else is even worth consideration.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
So if all other option are somehow limited and skoria outperforms then on stamina and magica builds alike because it does not share those or other limitations:
Isn´t that the definition of overperforming when compared to other proccdmg sets?
So are you saying skoria outperforms selene, stormfist and every other monster set or are you saying skoria outperforms "stamina monster sets" on magicka builds/ "magicka monster sets" on stamina builds?
I´m saying that skoria outperforms any other offensive monsterset - when you meet procc conditions (which are only really hard to meet for stamblade, magsorc and warden).
It´s just not even a contest: If you want sth offensive you go for skoria - nothing else is even worth consideration.
So no slimecraw, nor bloodspawn allowing more ultis? Grothdarr for melee magades.
Waffennacht wrote: »@Derra just fyi, Templars usually run slimecraw
Skoria needs either
(A) to be dodgeable
(B) a 1-second delay and telegraph circle
Now queue the SnB blocktatoes with $800 headsets BUT THERE'S AN AUDIO CUE AND U CAN BLOCK
Waffennacht wrote: »@Derra just fyi, Templars usually run slimecraw
I have not seen a single templar wearing slimecraw ever since i´ve picked up dueling again (6 months ago) on pc eu - ever.
Not one.
Also i wouldn´t wear slimecraw for dmg if you´d pay me to do it. It barely performs better than 1x dmg 1x stat and does not boost healing while doing that. Terrible choice overall - imho.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »it´s always funny seeing ppl defend skoria these days.
Sure it´s totally fine. That´s why magbuilds without any "native" dots (magsorc) equip it and equip dots to use it.
That´s also why stambuilds make setups to use it - because it has horrible proccconditions and is absolutely on the same level as other proccsets.
-_-
Because it's first bonus is universal and it's trigger is not tied to specific dot damage
Other monster sets when used at range (if you can even trigger it) become wildly inaccurate or just plain worthless (kragh at range lulz)
Skoria isn't used in a multitude of builds because it's the end all be all, but because other options are incredibly limited.
The only other set I can think of that would even come close to replacing Skoria would be nerienth and it just isn't fast enough
So if all other option are somehow limited and skoria outperforms then on stamina and magica builds alike because it does not share those or other limitations:
Isn´t that the definition of overperforming when compared to other proccdmg sets?
So are you saying skoria outperforms selene, stormfist and every other monster set or are you saying skoria outperforms "stamina monster sets" on magicka builds/ "magicka monster sets" on stamina builds?
I´m saying that skoria outperforms any other offensive monsterset - when you meet procc conditions (which are only really hard to meet for stamblade, magsorc and warden).
It´s just not even a contest: If you want sth offensive you go for skoria - nothing else is even worth consideration.
So no slimecraw, nor bloodspawn allowing more ultis? Grothdarr for melee magades.
Slimecraw is the most niche set i can think of tbh. NB gains the buff native by their best burst skill. Warden gains the buff - which leaves basically only DW sorc - as slimecraw will get outperformed by 5 5 1 builds.
Who uses slimecraw apart from those?
Bloodspawn is a defensive set and grothdarrr one melee magblade is somewhat of a special case as melee blade can fall under the category of not having the means to procc skoria.