Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Don't incorporate bugs into your builds, and you won't have [an] issue.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »LOL. DOTA. Not even worth considering when talking about ESO.
We have PvP championships. It's called the leaderboard. Nothing more is really needed for that.
Now, improving PvP itself, mostly start with server lag. But comparing to lol and dots is just lol.
Any suggestion to make ESO as popular as LOL or DOTA?
Give it to a different company
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »LOL. DOTA. Not even worth considering when talking about ESO.
We have PvP championships. It's called the leaderboard. Nothing more is really needed for that.
Now, improving PvP itself, mostly start with server lag. But comparing to lol and dots is just lol.
eh I would assume lag would not be an issue if we are talking 2v2 or 4v4. I think bi weakly balancing like @Alpheu5 suggested would be a good idea.
also it is sort of silly to compare this to DOTA or LOL. but heck what should I compare it to ? for honor ? that is a lolol.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »LOL. DOTA. Not even worth considering when talking about ESO.
We have PvP championships. It's called the leaderboard. Nothing more is really needed for that.
Now, improving PvP itself, mostly start with server lag. But comparing to lol and dots is just lol.
eh I would assume lag would not be an issue if we are talking 2v2 or 4v4. I think bi weakly balancing like @Alpheu5 suggested would be a good idea.
also it is sort of silly to compare this to DOTA or LOL. but heck what should I compare it to ? for honor ? that is a lolol.
We have 4v4v4 already.
Besides, your suggesting Zos pay people to play the game. The idea would draw in players but not consistent players. Not the ones who would play the game day in and out or even weekly.
Just a lame idea overall.
WaltherCarraway wrote: »Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »LOL. DOTA. Not even worth considering when talking about ESO.
We have PvP championships. It's called the leaderboard. Nothing more is really needed for that.
Now, improving PvP itself, mostly start with server lag. But comparing to lol and dots is just lol.
eh I would assume lag would not be an issue if we are talking 2v2 or 4v4. I think bi weakly balancing like @Alpheu5 suggested would be a good idea.
also it is sort of silly to compare this to DOTA or LOL. but heck what should I compare it to ? for honor ? that is a lolol.
We have 4v4v4 already.
Besides, your suggesting Zos pay people to play the game. The idea would draw in players but not consistent players. Not the ones who would play the game day in and out or even weekly.
Just a lame idea overall.
ZOS paid famous streamers on Morrowind release. tbh some of them were just embarrassing, nothing wrong about themselves but just embarrassing...
Waffennacht wrote: »They aren't MMOs right? Like pre made stuff? Similar to FPS?
Kyle1983b14_ESO wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »They aren't MMOs right? Like pre made stuff? Similar to FPS?
They're Mobas, not Fps
- Update 23Ice Furnace: This item set now grants Spell Damage, rather than Weapon Damage for the 4 piece bonus
ZOS could create a BG map similar to DOTA with similar mechanics. Just a thought
ZOS could create a BG map similar to DOTA with similar mechanics. Just a thought
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***