PVP Group Sizes

Shaggygaming

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

Shaggygaming

I personally think anything more than 8 is a zerg but I am an old DAOC fan. DAOC competitive 8 mans were the most fun I've ever had in MMO PVP.

Psilent

Any group over 1 I consider a zerg.

Agrippa_Invisus

Shaggygaming wrote: »

I personally think anything more than 8 is a zerg but I am an old DAOC fan. DAOC competitive 8 mans were the most fun I've ever had in MMO PVP.

It was always a point of pride how much our Alb melee masher group could wipe in one go. Our biggest number was 47 in the Lord room of Caer Hurbury (in RVR 1.0, back when the keeps were static things).

1 Paladin (me)
2 Mercs
1 Reaver / Polearmsman
1 Sorc
1 Minstrel
2 Clerics

But that's a digression.

This game is different and built for different things. It's also much faster paced than DAoC.

Abram

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

SwampRaider

I prefer large groups. 24 is a great number to run

I lead massive 50 man PVP groups in Archeage. It is SO essential. I was able to keep tabs on my scouts, small man gank teams and finally my main mageball force at once.(On land and naval pvp combat) having to assign people different icons and numbers above their head for the jobs they do.

IMHO ESO should adapt the archeage combat raid manager UI. So we can have multiple icons per group

geonsocal

ideal pvp group size: one...

Shaggygaming

Agrippa_Invisus wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

I personally think anything more than 8 is a zerg but I am an old DAOC fan. DAOC competitive 8 mans were the most fun I've ever had in MMO PVP.

It was always a point of pride how much our Alb melee masher group could wipe in one go. Our biggest number was 47 in the Lord room of Caer Hurbury (in RVR 1.0, back when the keeps were static things).

1 Paladin (me)
2 Mercs
1 Reaver / Polearmsman
1 Sorc
1 Minstrel
2 Clerics

But that's a digression.

This game is different and built for different things. It's also much faster paced than DAoC.

Yeah, nice melee setup. My alb group ran wizard heavy during Catacombs. My hib and mid groups were melee heavy but I think I enjoyed the spirit master bomb groups with the aoe stun the most. That was awesome!

Satiar

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

Inig0

the game tells you when youre about to make a zerg. after 4 is a LARGE GROUP aka ZERG
xD

Shaggygaming

Inig0 wrote: »

the game tells you when youre about to make a zerg. after 4 is a LARGE GROUP aka ZERG
xD

Can confirm. Larger than 4 players is considered a LARGE GROUP.

Ghost-Shot

Inig0 wrote: »

the game tells you when youre about to make a zerg. after 4 is a LARGE GROUP aka ZERG
xD

The term zerg has nothing to do with large group though, the logic is flawed!

Abram

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this your idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

incite

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this your idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Hahaha

1-0

Rin_Senya

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

All I see is excuses

Abram

Rin_Senya wrote: »

All I see is excuses

SELF-Proclaimed best guild NA, i guess when youre "self-proclaimed" you dont have to prove it. No reasoning with these forum warriors.

Satiar

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Abram

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

You say you have never run from any of these fights, so Im confused why you wont even show up for one?

Ghost-Shot

Rin_Senya wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

All I see is excuses

Do you even have enough members to match a classic VE 37 man?

incite

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

Is Satiar that nb ambush pro?

Satiar

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

You avoid actually engaging with what im saying and go back to spewing egotistical, nonsensical salt in every post. It's not a particularly deep conversation but I suppose it is entertaining.

Ghost-Shot

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

You are part of a guild that gladly stacks with your entire faction then claims to be fighting outnumbered and we are delusional? LOL

Kilandros

Are we not all zerglings in this great MMO called life?

Shaggygaming

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

You say you have never run from any of these fights, so Im confused why you wont even show up for one?

Who are you? Do you play with PM?

Ghost-Shot

Kilandros wrote: »

Are we not all zerglings in this great MMO called life?

I am Ghostbane.

Satiar

incite wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

Like I said, no reasoning with you guys. 100% Delusional. You cannot when in a straight GvG and you cannot win in a straight 1 v 1. Pretty much the end of the argument. If you would like to prove me otherwise. Lets handle it in game.

Is Satiar that nb ambush pro?

Back in my prime! My glory days!

incite

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

If you're that ambush nb, id say your last 2 sentences here, are a bit out of order no?

Satiar

incite wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Satiar wrote: »

Abram wrote: »

Shaggygaming wrote: »

Please continue the group size discussion. I really enjoy reading the ignorance while drinking my morning coffee at work.

I'm talking to you, never run more than 16, never run more than 12, and never run less than 37.

Please continue...

I'm just really curious to the convenience of the thread getting closed after we start talking about Guild v Guilds....

All these arguments are just words, I think its time for people to start backing up all this Sh** talk IN GAME.

We're in game 5x a week, as we have been for the last several years. There are no obstacles to finding and fighting us. That's the joy of open world RvRvR, as opposed to an artificial setup where we're both running a very particular GvG setup and comp.

Any groups we've gone after in the game, we've handled in this fashion and intend to continue doing so. The guilds that gave us strong challenges (Nexus Meth Emp groups, GoS emp raids on TF, Decibel, Rage, etc) we met on the field. You could do that if you wanted to, but you'd rather not and that's your choice. Wanting that grudge match so hard is bewildering to me. Any group Weve found ourselves unable to consistently beat, Bulb and I have worked and crafted our raid and strategy until we ended up on top. We never just stewed in our unhappiness and complained that our enemies wouldn't lower themselves to fight on our level and on our terms. It's a dumb attitude for this kind of game, and I won't indulge it.

LMAO, moar *** talk. Lets just settle this already. Are you scared the g v g will have the same results as our 1 v 1?

is this youre idea of meeting in the field?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkUEepRgkd8

Ah yes, our legendary duel where you came in with a Stam proc build and started challenging a bunch of ppl testing out unmorphed destro ults. Like, im glad you had fun but I'm surprised you're still holding onto it. Beating me in a duel is no great accomplishment anymore, I got out of the 1v1 scene in 1.6.

Again, you know where to find us. You can bring a group prepped to win or you can bring one that isn't and whine if you lose. Your level of entitlement is high. I've fought you outnumbered, even numbers and while greatly outnumbering you. I've never run from any of those engagements, and while I'd like some back (that's life!) i rest easy knowing I've played you guys hard in all circumstances and I'm satisfied with my W/L ratio. I don't think that's the case for you, or you wouldn't be spewing salt. You know when i run, how many I run and what our specs are: and yet you keeps running into me. If you're good enough to win the majority of those Do So. If not, stop whining for me to come down to your level. Get good.

If you're that ambush nb, id say your last 2 sentences here, are a bit out of order no?

It worked tho .

Ppl don't get salty when they win. No one gives a *** who you are, what you run or how many as long as they're still beating you.

Logohs

In west Philadelphia born and raised
On the playground was where I spent most of my days

Abram

incite wrote: »

If you're that ambush nb, id say your last 2 sentences here, are a bit out of order no?

Its like I said Incite, there is literally no reasoning with them. They actually believe they are unquestionably the best. Please don't expect any logical rebuttal, you will be sadly disappointed.

Ghost-Shot

Abram wrote: »

incite wrote: »

If you're that ambush nb, id say your last 2 sentences here, are a bit out of order no?

Its like I said Incite, there is literally no reasoning with them. They actually believe they are unquestionably the best. Please don't expect any logical rebuttal, you will be sadly disappointed.

What has your guild accomplished that you get make demands of us? We are satisfied with our wins, most of your guild is on farm in our kill counters. The ball is in our court.