LadyDestiny wrote: »Did we need all that?
To continue what @Crafts_Many_Boxes says, here is the trending data for "ESO"
Doesn't look dead to me. You can look for yourself here: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=ESO
Note that all of the related topics are video game/mmo related
Shadow_Viper_vX wrote: »Pointless Thread is Pointless
Another day another emo troll post about the game dying.
non-sense
LadyDestiny wrote: »Did we need all that?
I only got thru the second paragraph before I decided the writer is talking thru the opening not on top of his body. Are you looking to up your epeen?
I don't use google.
what do you get out of this??
So take your fancy graphs and pie charts and shove them somewhere that i cant say because of the forum rules.
On general gaming forums eso reputation has been raising over the time
DeadlyRecluse wrote: »I, too, can poorly interpret graphs.
crappyjazz1964 wrote: »Usually if I google something about this game it's "where to find ninroot"
Don't get way it's so important for you to prove that the game is dying
ESO has shown stable growth.
thread is pointless.
good luck in your attempt to drive traffic to wtfever that crap website you linked
My sales on guilds steadily increasing since One Tamriel
magictucktuck wrote: »OP is obviously trolling, he is blatantly ignoring all the facts and only focusing on his 1% used keyword.
Thannazzar wrote: »pathetic attempt at self aggrandisement
Do not like the game? Then leave instead of whining like a little kiddo about it for *** weeks.
RavenRoxie wrote: »I truly hope the OP does not have a job in sales, because you are bad at it.
cecibergesnrb18_ESO wrote: »Sigh...I'm just wondering how much longer we have to wait for the quitters to quit.
Absolut_Turkey wrote: »You must be so embarrassed! Seriously though, pointless thread is pointless.
ZOS has more detailed statisics
This Author is a complete idiot. Nobody is searching this game, because we're already on it! Lol
LvDPrankWars wrote: »I cant even be *** to read all that but it is far from dead
The OP has an agenda and has found something unrelated to try and support it. I am not arguing that the numbers are wrong or invented. I am saying they are unrelated to the state of the game.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Your ridiculousness is impressive.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Trump approves the OP.
it is a l2s (learn to stats) issue.
ESO is still here.
DMuehlhausen wrote: »Just stop please. It's such a waste of time.
it's the same handful of people continually crying about anything they can possibly pull out of their A** and really every MMO out there has it's doomsayers, except for maybe FFXIV
AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »I just did pvp 2 days ago hundreds of players
This might be one of the most pathetic posts I have seen...
KeiruNicrom wrote: »Why would people who are playing the game currently be searching for it. They already have it.
the data is worthless.
cavakthestampede wrote: »Google trends is not reliable
Karius_Imalthar wrote: »I never search for "Elder Scrolls Online". I always type "ESO".
2.5k views on a lame uninteresting thread.
The data is heavily skewered toward the OP's narrative.
Windows 10 forced on a lot of people, also tries to force people to use Cortana and Bing. It even removes Chrome. That alone would decrease the number of Google searches.
lunalitetempler wrote: »Stop moaning and learn to play.
The amount of people hating ESO is real.

crappyjazz1964 wrote: »73% of statistics are made up
Shadow_Viper_vX wrote: »Pointless Thread is PointlessAnother day another emo troll post about the game dying.non-senseLadyDestiny wrote: »Did we need all that?I only got thru the second paragraph before I decided the writer is talking thru the opening not on top of his body. Are you looking to up your epeen?I don't use google.what do you get out of this??So take your fancy graphs and pie charts and shove them somewhere that i cant say because of the forum rules.On general gaming forums eso reputation has been raising over the timeDeadlyRecluse wrote: »I, too, can poorly interpret graphs.crappyjazz1964 wrote: »Usually if I google something about this game it's "where to find ninroot"Don't get way it's so important for you to prove that the game is dyingESO has shown stable growth.thread is pointless.good luck in your attempt to drive traffic to wtfever that crap website you linkedMy sales on guilds steadily increasing since One Tamrielmagictucktuck wrote: »OP is obviously trolling, he is blatantly ignoring all the facts and only focusing on his 1% used keyword.Thannazzar wrote: »pathetic attempt at self aggrandisementDo not like the game? Then leave instead of whining like a little kiddo about it for *** weeks.RavenRoxie wrote: »I truly hope the OP does not have a job in sales, because you are bad at it.cecibergesnrb18_ESO wrote: »Sigh...I'm just wondering how much longer we have to wait for the quitters to quit.Absolut_Turkey wrote: »You must be so embarrassed! Seriously though, pointless thread is pointless.ZOS has more detailed statisicsThis Author is a complete idiot. Nobody is searching this game, because we're already on it! LolLvDPrankWars wrote: »I cant even be *** to read all that but it is far from deadThe OP has an agenda and has found something unrelated to try and support it. I am not arguing that the numbers are wrong or invented. I am saying they are unrelated to the state of the game.THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Your ridiculousness is impressive.THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Trump approves the OP.it is a l2s (learn to stats) issue.ESO is still here.DMuehlhausen wrote: »Just stop please. It's such a waste of time.it's the same handful of people continually crying about anything they can possibly pull out of their A** and really every MMO out there has it's doomsayers, except for maybe FFXIVAoDD33pfri3d wrote: »I just did pvp 2 days ago hundreds of playersThis might be one of the most pathetic posts I have seen...KeiruNicrom wrote: »Why would people who are playing the game currently be searching for it. They already have it.the data is worthless.cavakthestampede wrote: »Google trends is not reliableKarius_Imalthar wrote: »I never search for "Elder Scrolls Online". I always type "ESO".2.5k views on a lame uninteresting thread.The data is heavily skewered toward the OP's narrative.Windows 10 forced on a lot of people, also tries to force people to use Cortana and Bing. It even removes Chrome. That alone would decrease the number of Google searches.lunalitetempler wrote: »Stop moaning and learn to play.The amount of people hating ESO is real.
IcyDeadPeople wrote: »Is it not obvious to everyone that consumer interest spikes with product launches / expansions, etc? Is it surprising that this coincides with marketing spend?To continue what @Crafts_Many_Boxes says, here is the trending data for "ESO"
Doesn't look dead to me. You can look for yourself here: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=ESO
Note that all of the related topics are video game/mmo related
Yes exactly, spikes in trending with console launch and One Tamriel, and then interest has been rising a bit since then. There will be another bump with Morrowind launch, just hoping enough new players stick around for the Battlegrounds.
I have only one thing to say: let it go, Rinaldo. The game isn't dying, servers are packed and I wish I wouldn't stumble on 2-3 guys in every single even most remote dungeon killing my mobs and stealing my XP... Even on 4 am, like now. And I don't even mention the dolmens, the world bosses and happy campers falling from the sky like rain in Cyro.
I think I'll take a break when Morrowind "chapter" comes, because there will be a Warden and a bear behind every tree. Beware, next peak is coming!
Statistics of any kind can be manipulated in million ways, as many posters stated above. And you are a victim of confirmation bias, my friend, so really - drop the google, go outside and smell the fresh, spring flowers instead. Everybody and everything dies, and my father did, too - shortly before ESO was launched. But this game will not die for a long time.
Doctordarkspawn wrote: »
Pretty much.
The fanbois will never stop defending a product. It is how they be. Bonus points if you can identify one or more names on this list who consistantly defend ZOS without any arguements based on fact, data, or any sort of measurable metric in multiple threads. I know I can! But naming and shaming is against forum rules, so, play at home kids.
Bonus points if you can identify one or more names on this list who consistantly defend ZOS without any arguements based on fact, data, or any sort of measurable metric in multiple threads
I only got thru the second paragraph before I decided the writer is talking thru the opening not on top of his body. Are you looking to up your epeen?Windows 10 forced on a lot of people, also tries to force people to use Cortana and Bing. It even removes Chrome. That alone would decrease the number of Google searches.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Just to follow up, this issue will be fixed when we launch Update 14 (Morrowind). For what it's worth, this is only appearing on the Live megaservers so we never encountered it on our internal servers. It is just a visual issue, though; the items all still do the same thing.
Thats pretty disappointing Gina. It speaks poorly of ZOS quality control that you can OOPS a itemization database wrongly into the game and say, "Oh well.. live with it until we have our big launch in three weeks". And, yeah, I know its not you. You just get to be the messenger for a sucky message.
I kinda wish the shareholders of ZoS could see this kinda shoddy game design.
FYI, ZOS has no shareholders. It's not publicly traded. I know it's edgy and cool to trot out the shareholder card when you're mad at the game, but in this case it doesn't apply.
Google wrote:"Google Trends data is an unbiased sample of Google search data. Only a percentage of searches are used to compile Trends data.
Real time data is a random sample of searches from the last seven days.
Non-real time data is a random sample of Google search data that can be pulled from as far back as 2004 and up to 36 hours prior to your search.
Once the search data is collected, we categorize it, connect it to a topic, and remove any personal information.
Data that is excluded
Searches made by very few people: Trends only shows data for popular terms, so search terms with low volume appear as 0.
Duplicate searches: Trends eliminates repeated searches from the same person over a short period of time.
Special characters: Trends filters out queries with apostrophes and other special characters.
Google wrote:Trends adjusts search data to make comparisons between terms easier.
Search results are proportionate to the time and location of a query:
Each data point is divided by the total searches of the geography and time range it represents, to compare relative popularity. Otherwise places with the most search volume would always be ranked highest.
The resulting numbers are then scaled on a range of 0 to 100 based on a topic’s proportion to all searches on all topics.
Different regions that show the same number of searches for a term will not always have the same total search volumes.
Doctordarkspawn wrote: »LadyDestiny wrote: »Did we need all that?
Not really considering the people who are denying it will deny damn near anything that isn't the tooth fairy coming up and slapping them.