RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »The only sad truth is this thread is badly titled . I've laughed more here then any other thread .
@Rohamad_Ali
Here is the thing, (That i was afraid of when i started this thread)
All the counter arguments here are based soley on peoples personal biases.
they equate "their experience in-game" as gospel and fact.
Because they "see" Stormhaven with a bunch of people that means the games health is fine...despite outside sources such as Google Trends showing interest in the game took a huge Noise dive in June of 2015 (Imperial City release) and the games interest has never come close to rebounding back since. The lowest it ever got was December 2014, but the dive after IC put it like 5% above that and it has hover in the 5-7% margin of that since with small little highs and lows in between.
The BIG issue with the ESO community(Well any MMO community really) is bias....folks take their own personal biases as fact, and will ignore, ridicule, and outright dismiss anything that doesn't line up with what they experience "in-game". This is a very dangerous, untenable, outright irrational position to hold.
The majority of those arguing against these trends have their basis seated in irrationality. Many people have developed a "love for the game" or have close ties to it, even I am guilty of this. I used to stay up at night and play this game while my Dad was sleeping due to too much pain meds while he was dying of cancer. So i myself do have my own personal love of this game for many of my own reasons.I myself have to be careful not to let my own personal love for ESO and my personal biases to cloud my judgement.
When I log into the game, the game world appears to have people in it. I would assume the game was ok going by soley that alone, but Google Trends is that "neutral outside source" that isn't biased.
Its hard to put aside your personal biases. Biases are based on personal feelings, and human feelings are literally the most irrational things on the planet. Human beings in their very nature can be irrational at times...its why were human, it makes life interesting.
PVP is the best example, we all have zerg goggles....when 10 people zerged us down it feels like a whole raid sometimes...our own biases initially think its 20 people, but its really only 7-10....this is the best example of how in-game biases does not equal reality.
Things that are popular and successful are searched on Google a lot, things that are not, are not. Google Shows ESO taking two very large nose dives, one in 2014 (After the Lighting Patch), and another in June of 2015 (After IC) the games pop, speaking of PC-NA, has never really recovered from those two drops....
I don't have console, so maybe the population there is better due to how much more mainstream console is, but even then, trends show interest down.
As much as I love ESO, heck this game helped me deal with losing my dad, Even i can put aside my own personal biases and look at outside data from an objective point of view....trying to base decisions on personal experiences in-game is intellectually dishonest....This would be like someone trying to refute smoking causes cancer because that person has smoked for 35 years and never gotten cancer...its intellectually dishonest, its an untenable position...yet on these forums, in-game experiences based on irrationality and personal bias seem to be taken like gospel and folks just pile on popular opinion.
Folks that say the game is doing good have ZERO verifiable proof of those claims other then their own personal experiences in game which is rooted in bias and has no basis facts....yet statistics put up from an independent source and read according to Googles own guidelines are ripped apart by the very same arguments rooted in those biases.
Its almost an affront to free thought....if def clear that trying to simply state what the data says will always be met with resistance here, simply because so many have some sort of personal attachment to the game, that they will never get past their biases and evaluate things objectively....and that's really a shame. Real progress can be made with open minds, but i can't force peoples minds open....folks have to want to learn for themselves....
Malamar1229 wrote: »The google searches are all the console folks looking up lorebook and skyshard locations
The constant doom and gloom on this forum....
Valkysas154 wrote: »I reported a little while back that we would give ESO yet another try. We did. After logging in, I struggled to find a single player actually doing anything out in the world of ESO
Stopped reading right there.. Such lie's there are plenty of ppl running around doing quests what did this person do play the game at 3 in the morning or something
PS not every one uses google i sure don't
Crafts_Many_Boxes wrote: »I love how every one of OP's rebuttals doesn't address the fact that Google analytics is worthless if you're only looking at one keyword search when dozens, even hundreds of related keyword searches are done by players who are actually in the game.
Add up all the "X guide ESO", "ESO forums", "ESO X builds", "ESO X DLC", AND all of the "Elder scrolls Online" searches, along with ALL the related fansite searches, and then you'll have real-ish, somewhat meaningful data about general interest in the game, and probably a good idea about game population.




AoDD33pfri3d wrote: »Dude are you sure you were on eso I just did pvp 2 days ago hundreds of players, in pve I see a bunch of people.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Crafts_Many_Boxes wrote: »I love how every one of OP's rebuttals doesn't address the fact that Google analytics is worthless if you're only looking at one keyword search when dozens, even hundreds of related keyword searches are done by players who are actually in the game.
Add up all the "X guide ESO", "ESO forums", "ESO X builds", "ESO X DLC", AND all of the "Elder scrolls Online" searches, along with ALL the related fansite searches, and then you'll have real-ish, somewhat meaningful data about general interest in the game, and probably a good idea about game population.
You assume I only looked at one term....which again...is a wrong assumption.
Here is two quick images I was able to pull off my cloud drive(I don't have time to take and upload the 70+ terms I used, here is 4 for ya)
Adding up every single search term ever conceived for ESO is ridiclious and is not how trends are forecast. Google correlates multiple search queries related to ESO behind the scenes. Just searching on ESO on Google trends takes that query + a few hundred others and matches(such as ESO builds, ESO forums, ESO tips, etc) them together and correlates them against their search system worldwide...so that way you don't have to put in every single term.....if you have used their Adwords bidding program to show you the competition among various Adwords and various Adword terms related to yours, this is how it works.
Those are 4 examples of other such trends that show the same nosedive in 2015 after Imperial City release.
Again the game IMO is much better now then it was after IC release in 2015, but that's just my opinion which is of course biased.
Again, the data is there. I am not here to argue with personal biases, I am here to hopefully get ZOS to start thinking up more ideas to get more people to try ESO so we can have a larger player base. If you were not here in 2014 you don't know how many people there used to be...all the people you see in One Tamriel...times that by 10 with only your faction alone back then.
We should never settle for status quo, we should always try to improve and strive for more. Refusal to acknowledge a problem is a problem itself and does no one any good. Its not just about ESO game life....we need to make sure they make as much money as possible because future games from them depend on it....the more money they make, the more money they have for future games and current games...its in our best interests to try and get as many people to try ESO as possible.
the petty insults and defensive natures really have no place here, the thread isn't antagonistic in nature, but many people started right away to turn it into that.When in reality the threads purpose is to get them to attract more players.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »
Here is the thing, (That i was afraid of when i started this thread)
All the counter arguments here are based soley on peoples personal biases.
they equate "their experience in-game" as gospel and fact.
And your arguments are based on your biases, "supported" by charts you could find that you think agree with those biases.
lordrichter wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »All the counter arguments here are based soley on peoples personal biases.
The thing is that your entire first comment in this thread, and most of the ones since then, have been exactly this. You read an article and the article resonated with you. You have, since then, worked to build the case against ESO.
If you had spent some time investigating what your graphs mean, you would have seen that your graphs are showing the base line interest in the game, and that this interest is not waning. It is staying relatively steady.
Do a Google Trends search on "rivenspire", "wayrest", and "mournhold" and you will see a trend of increasing interest. Do a search on "stonefalls" and "auridon" and you will see that flat line, again. These searches indicate queries that are going to be coming from people playing the game, not from people who are just passing by wondering about the game.
Look at the Google Trends for Morrowind. You can watch the game's level of interest decline over time, until this year, when interest has been climbing. This indicates interest in both the old TES game, and the ESO Chapter.

..if people are not searching for ESO, they are not thinking about ESO, thus they are not interested in it nor playing it as much as we all think.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »All the counter arguments here are based soley on peoples personal biases.
The thing is that your entire first comment in this thread, and most of the ones since then, have been exactly this. You read an article and the article resonated with you. You have, since then, worked to build the case against ESO.
If you had spent some time investigating what your graphs mean, you would have seen that your graphs are showing the base line interest in the game, and that this interest is not waning. It is staying relatively steady.
Do a Google Trends search on "rivenspire", "wayrest", and "mournhold" and you will see a trend of increasing interest. Do a search on "stonefalls" and "auridon" and you will see that flat line, again. These searches indicate queries that are going to be coming from people playing the game, not from people who are just passing by wondering about the game.
Look at the Google Trends for Morrowind. You can watch the game's level of interest decline over time, until this year, when interest has been climbing. This indicates interest in both the old TES game, and the ESO Chapter.
Nope
My original intent was DISPROVE the article, and oh boy did i ever try (over 80+ queries related to ESO) but the results end up coming back to being close to what your looking at....don't get me wrong some queries do have some ups like your talking about, but even TES Oblivion has constant up and down spikes even to this day.
I am saying "overall" over 70+ queries related to ESO...this is the average trend. the absolute best thing we can hope for is Morriwind causes a BIG uptick and then it levels out at about twice what it is now...which is right around the 50's...if it stays right around the 50's after Morrowind...we got a big winner and thats what im hoping for!
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Crafts_Many_Boxes wrote: »I love how every one of OP's rebuttals doesn't address the fact that Google analytics is worthless if you're only looking at one keyword search when dozens, even hundreds of related keyword searches are done by players who are actually in the game.
Add up all the "X guide ESO", "ESO forums", "ESO X builds", "ESO X DLC", AND all of the "Elder scrolls Online" searches, along with ALL the related fansite searches, and then you'll have real-ish, somewhat meaningful data about general interest in the game, and probably a good idea about game population.
You assume I only looked at one term....which again...is a wrong assumption.
Here is two quick images I was able to pull off my cloud drive(I don't have time to take and upload the 70+ terms I used, here is 4 for ya)
Adding up every single search term ever conceived for ESO is ridiclious and is not how trends are forecast. Google correlates multiple search queries related to ESO behind the scenes. Just searching on ESO on Google trends takes that query + a few hundred others and matches(such as ESO builds, ESO forums, ESO tips, etc) them together and correlates them against their search system worldwide...so that way you don't have to put in every single term.....if you have used their Adwords bidding program to show you the competition among various Adwords and various Adword terms related to yours, this is how it works.
Those are 4 examples of other such trends that show the same nosedive in 2015 after Imperial City release.
Again the game IMO is much better now then it was after IC release in 2015, but that's just my opinion which is of course biased.
Again, the data is there. I am not here to argue with personal biases, I am here to hopefully get ZOS to start thinking up more ideas to get more people to try ESO so we can have a larger player base. If you were not here in 2014 you don't know how many people there used to be...all the people you see in One Tamriel...times that by 10 with only your faction alone back then.
We should never settle for status quo, we should always try to improve and strive for more. Refusal to acknowledge a problem is a problem itself and does no one any good. Its not just about ESO game life....we need to make sure they make as much money as possible because future games from them depend on it....the more money they make, the more money they have for future games and current games...its in our best interests to try and get as many people to try ESO as possible.
the petty insults and defensive natures really have no place here, the thread isn't antagonistic in nature, but many people started right away to turn it into that.When in reality the threads purpose is to get them to attract more players.
So ... when do you expect it to die?
Jollygoodusername wrote: »I completely understand the OP here. My favorite MMO is The Secret World, I find it fun and challenging with great music and quests/missions that don't bore me. TSW is dead however, just like ESO will be if people continue to blow off current and past issues, while pushing the players away.
If you're not complaining, you're a part of the problem. That's generally what this thread seems to be about, too many biased fans of ESO who're content with everything, to notice that they're on the last roll of toilet paper.
Jollygoodusername wrote: »I completely understand the OP here. My favorite MMO is The Secret World, I find it fun and challenging with great music and quests/missions that don't bore me. TSW is dead however, just like ESO will be if people continue to blow off current and past issues, while pushing the players away.
If you're not complaining, you're a part of the problem. That's generally what this thread seems to be about, too many biased fans of ESO who're content with everything, to notice that they're on the last roll of toilet paper.
EDIT: Pushing out new content doesn't equate to more players and more money. A good friend of mine is a professional glass blower/artist. He and his father spend all day creating pieces of new art, this doesn't mean that all/any of them will sell. Same applies to ESO: Morrowind which has an unlimited supply of digital content to sell. It's not doomsday thinking, it's just common sense and looking at other failings in the same MMO genre, should give hindsight.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Please understand, I don't want this game to die. I actually have fun playing it when I do play it. I have met a lot of good people in this game. If anything it makes me sad (hence the Thread Title)
Statistics DO NOT lie only "manipulated statisitcs" do...of which no such manipulation has been done. Anyone can Google "Google Trends" type in ESO, The Elder Scrolls Online, etc and get the same exact unmanipulated results.
Google has invested Hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars into Research and Development into research of Trends and Marketing, their entire business is based off it......They are right 9-out 10 times when it comes to this kinda stuff. They ahve a track record to prove it.
cavakthestampede wrote: »I reat this on the Internet so it must be true.
FYI Google trends is not reliable because it only tracks specific search terms. If a person searches tamriel unlimited or TESO or thieves guild, or morrowind then it doesn't show up as ESO for Google trends.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Crafts_Many_Boxes wrote: »I love how every one of OP's rebuttals doesn't address the fact that Google analytics is worthless if you're only looking at one keyword search when dozens, even hundreds of related keyword searches are done by players who are actually in the game.
Add up all the "X guide ESO", "ESO forums", "ESO X builds", "ESO X DLC", AND all of the "Elder scrolls Online" searches, along with ALL the related fansite searches, and then you'll have real-ish, somewhat meaningful data about general interest in the game, and probably a good idea about game population.
You assume I only looked at one term....which again...is a wrong assumption.
Here is two quick images I was able to pull off my cloud drive(I don't have time to take and upload the 70+ terms I used, here is 4 for ya)
Adding up every single search term ever conceived for ESO is ridiclious and is not how trends are forecast. Google correlates multiple search queries related to ESO behind the scenes. Just searching on ESO on Google trends takes that query + a few hundred others and matches(such as ESO builds, ESO forums, ESO tips, etc) them together and correlates them against their search system worldwide...so that way you don't have to put in every single term.....if you have used their Adwords bidding program to show you the competition among various Adwords and various Adword terms related to yours, this is how it works.
Those are 4 examples of other such trends that show the same nosedive in 2015 after Imperial City release.
Again the game IMO is much better now then it was after IC release in 2015, but that's just my opinion which is of course biased.
Again, the data is there. I am not here to argue with personal biases, I am here to hopefully get ZOS to start thinking up more ideas to get more people to try ESO so we can have a larger player base. If you were not here in 2014 you don't know how many people there used to be...all the people you see in One Tamriel...times that by 10 with only your faction alone back then.
We should never settle for status quo, we should always try to improve and strive for more. Refusal to acknowledge a problem is a problem itself and does no one any good. Its not just about ESO game life....we need to make sure they make as much money as possible because future games from them depend on it....the more money they make, the more money they have for future games and current games...its in our best interests to try and get as many people to try ESO as possible.
the petty insults and defensive natures really have no place here, the thread isn't antagonistic in nature, but many people started right away to turn it into that.When in reality the threads purpose is to get them to attract more players.
So ... when do you expect it to die?
Again your asking a dishonest loaded question. How can i possibly make a guess when i really have no idea what their financial books look like?
they had a 300 million dollar investment from Providence Equity Partners in 2007
In 2010 they got an extra $150 million from the same investors
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/147886/500-million-to-make-eso/p1
Thats 450 million dollars right there alone...how much of that is left? I have no idea...they could operate in the red for years with that kinda capital....you know darn well your asking me a dishonest question that is impossible to answer without data im obviously missing.