KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Two words: Cliff Racers!
The sub issue seems silly to me, you pay for current benefits, getting access to future DLCs is a benefit of subbing in the future.
I guess it would be fairer if the expansion could be bought with crowns, but I'm really not fussed about $40.
I do think they should add additional free character slots with the expansion though.I also think it's past time certain achievements and timesinks went account wide.
I like what I've seen so far, a lot of stuff that didn't make sense about their development priorities makes more sense now.
Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Your numbers work out to 666,000 subscritions per month at $15 / month in order to get the $10,000,000 you stated. If that is only 10% of the population in the game, then you believe the game has 6.6 million players?
I think you need to rethink your numbers.
giff2830_ESO wrote: »I'm a subscriber, since the beginning and for only 2 more days, sub is cancelled as of then. I'm a little annoyed at the whole thing. Pre-ordered Morrowind though, but no longer will be subscribing.
Not angry, just ESO+ no longer justifies itself.
lordrichter wrote: »Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Your numbers work out to 666,000 subscritions per month at $15 / month in order to get the $10,000,000 you stated. If that is only 10% of the population in the game, then you believe the game has 6.6 million players?
I think you need to rethink your numbers.
Ignore the 10% number. Just say that there are ~700k subscribers to ESO Plus. We can't know the real answer to that, so it is as good of a guess as any.
lordrichter wrote: »Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Your numbers work out to 666,000 subscritions per month at $15 / month in order to get the $10,000,000 you stated. If that is only 10% of the population in the game, then you believe the game has 6.6 million players?
I think you need to rethink your numbers.
Ignore the 10% number. Just say that there are ~700k subscribers to ESO Plus. We can't know the real answer to that, so it is as good of a guess as any.
Tavore1138 wrote: »I'm fine with it with one caveat - they continue to release other plausible DLC 3 or 4 times a year and that DLC continues to be free for ESO+ users. Then if they want to release an Expansion every 3 years or so to revitalise the game and add major additional elements then fine.... as long as I am still enjoying playing then £40 extra every few years isn't going to phase me unduly.
lordrichter wrote: »Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Your numbers work out to 666,000 subscritions per month at $15 / month in order to get the $10,000,000 you stated. If that is only 10% of the population in the game, then you believe the game has 6.6 million players?
I think you need to rethink your numbers.
Ignore the 10% number. Just say that there are ~700k subscribers to ESO Plus. We can't know the real answer to that, so it is as good of a guess as any.
Sandman929 wrote: »Tavore1138 wrote: »I'm fine with it with one caveat - they continue to release other plausible DLC 3 or 4 times a year and that DLC continues to be free for ESO+ users. Then if they want to release an Expansion every 3 years or so to revitalise the game and add major additional elements then fine.... as long as I am still enjoying playing then £40 extra every few years isn't going to phase me unduly.
Apparently they want to release new Chapters once a year. And if that's what it takes to get new classes, I'll pay. Or I'll pay more, I should say.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Ourorboros wrote: »I can understand why some aren't impressed at all by this DLC being called an expansion and thus put behind an additional paywall, but I also have perspective.
They gotta make money. I'd much prefer them charge for a proper expansion's array of content rather than push harder on the cash shop but give the expansion away at no extra charge.
They have to make money somewhere.
If only 10% of users sub, zos is making around $10 million/month. Do you really think only 10% sub for the crafting bad? It seems higher than that based on forum polls and group chat. How much does it cost to run this game? I have no experience here. Maybe it does cost more than 120 million a year, but I find that unlikely. Would you change your answer if you knew that zos was laughing all the way to the bank?
Your numbers work out to 666,000 subscritions per month at $15 / month in order to get the $10,000,000 you stated. If that is only 10% of the population in the game, then you believe the game has 6.6 million players?
I think you need to rethink your numbers.
Ignore the 10% number. Just say that there are ~700k subscribers to ESO Plus. We can't know the real answer to that, so it is as good of a guess as any.
yeah.... but is all just smoke and mirrors..... pretending you know something and then basing criticism on that.
really, is that the best you can do?