andreasranasen wrote: »
I'm not sure you wanna know ...
So will bots and gold sellers.andreasranasen wrote: »
If you thought 2016 was a great year for The Elder Scrolls Online, it was only the beginning...
Join ZOS Creative Director Rich Lambert and Bethesda VP of PR & Marketing Pete Hines live on Twitch tomorrow at 19:00 GMT, January 31st and discover the next chapter of The Elder Scrolls Online.
Watch they call it an expansion, so it won't be covered by ESO+ DLC access.
Rich said on Twitter he's gonna be wearing pants for the stream ...
This is serious!
andreasranasen wrote: »
GW2 is still very successful and still going strong! I'm excited!
FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »
Fake.@Sovaso Whatever are you going on about? The teaser is real and certainly not fake. There's no confirmation yet of it being Vvardenfell, but given that it appears to be lava and Vvardenfell has been datamined, that's as good a guess as any.Why this fake still not deleted?
FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »
No no no no no no no ç-ç
That would make me so mad! Skyrim dropped so many plotlines! I need to know what happens after it
If Matt isn't going to be there it likely isn't a change in model.
SantieClaws wrote: »
FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »
Publius_Scipio wrote: »Well it's been in the news that Zenimax (the parent company) is in a large legal battle with Oculus/Facebook...... Maybe Zenimax won and ESO..... IS GOING VR!!!!!!!!
VR PVP!!!!!!!!!!
I've always thought they may be able to get away with, for example, having a free account which has limited zone access or limited levelling capability. Something that essentially works as a trial/demo.andreasranasen wrote: »
GW2 is still very successful and still going strong! I'm excited!
This is actually the only way I can see such conversion working, with the worst way being simply dropping the box price like many other companies did.
GW2 has restrictions on its free accounts to heavily limit communication and trading, I imagine in an attempt of discouraging gold selling. It works to an extent, afaik (not as well was having a box price does, but oh well...).
I wouldnt be happy about that.
But do they have a reason to go f2p.
Existing model looks good, people play the game ZoS gets there money.
Games usualy change model when the old one fails like ESO when it was a subscription based game.
Yeah, so, GW2 kinda has limited zone access, but as you level on your free account you open more maps. Eventually, you have access to the entirety of the base game (so none of the maps that came with the Expansion Pack).I've always thought they may be able to get away with, for example, having a free account which has limited zone access or limited levelling capability. Something that essentially works as a trial/demo.andreasranasen wrote: »
GW2 is still very successful and still going strong! I'm excited!
This is actually the only way I can see such conversion working, with the worst way being simply dropping the box price like many other companies did.
GW2 has restrictions on its free accounts to heavily limit communication and trading, I imagine in an attempt of discouraging gold selling. It works to an extent, afaik (not as well was having a box price does, but oh well...).