Whatzituyah wrote: »
It's been proven that if you put a bunch of exclusives in a box, temptation will cause people to spend hundreds. It's a horrible and greedy thing to do. The fact ZOS would do this has severely reduced my respect for them.GrumpyMuffin wrote: »The most depressing thing about the crown crates is players are happy to give Zos their money, we are not expecting a free ride, we just want an honest, and fair, way to change real money for in game goods we want. We will buy what we want, we won't buy the hope of obtaining what we want.
lordrichter wrote: »
Of course not. What I expect of a studio that aspires to be a AAA studio is something better than Crown Crates, or locked boxes and purchased keys. I really expect more than MMO Cash Shops for Dummies.
.
It's been proven that if you put a bunch of exclusives in a box, temptation will cause people to spend hundreds. It's a horrible and greedy thing to do. The fact ZOS would do this has severely reduced my respect for them.
The statement posted after the crates were removed from pts indicate that they really aren't open to much feedback. They are more interested in using the same greedy tactics of other games and won't be swayed to change the crates because they know their potential. Greed has won.
Community: we want them removed
ZOS: we hear you. We are buffing the consumables you don't want. Since you don't want them regardless of what we do you can trade them for a very small amount of gems!
Facepalm
verenkutoja
✭✭
No, don't ever add these into the game.
Personally in response to this and other repeated behaviours from Zenimax, I have cancelled my subscription. I will not support such treatment of the player base and I certainly will not support 'gamble boxes'
In the future if something worthy of my attention were released, I might return, but right now? It looks pretty grim. I have cancelled by subscription once before shortly after the game switch to B2P due to the fact that Zenimax repeatedly lied claiming they would never come off the subscription model, so this is just a repeat of their usual lies and crap.
That and I opened a ticket asking for help with something, in spite of being perfectly reasonable and not at all abusive or profane, my ticket were set to 'solved' repeatedly without being given any answer to it. Even when I told them point blank "You can not just set a ticket to solved and assume its solved, I want a human response." - never got one until I cancelled my subscription and filed a new ticket explaining exactly why I cancelled. That to be honest were the last straw that I could tolerate.
verenkutoja
✭✭
No, don't ever add these into the game.
People want 'citation' as proof that Zenimax ever said they would not come off the subscription model, firstly that is not even really relevant to this thread, it were just something I brought up as one of my personal grievances. But you want citation? I can not pull up any videos, any forum posts, or anything like that. I am sure those opposed to my opinion will claim this proves I am wrong, but seriously.. keep deluding yourself, you really think Zenimax is not and has not lied and does not continue to lie?
Get a clue. They are a corporation. Corporations in large are almost exclusively dishonest and deceptive, its the 'modus operandi' for business practices.
Come on, I give people more credit than that. I can not believe anyone would be so blind as to not see it, you know the way they always word things in such a way that shines them in an unquestioningly positive light no matter what happens or what is done? You know how they keep saying We have no 'plans' at this time to/for - That is it, right there. That is the dishonesty, that is the deception. You know what people think and thought when they read that.
Its intentionally and intelligently deceptive too. Screw your player base over and make sure to word things in such a way that you can claim you are not responsible and surely some white knights will rise up to defend your company because they are apparently not wise enough to figure out what is actually going on.
I myself have emails from them in which they point blank told me back when I were fearing the worst for the game (near its launch) that they had no 'plans' to abandon the subscription model and it were working quite well for them and were successful. They literally said this point blank to me. Shortly thereafter? Game goes B2P.
You seriously think that were not planned? Honestly?
You are idealistic and naïve if you believe so. This were planned from the start.
Promise all this amazing stuff, spin everything in such an incredibly positive light, and get die hard fans hyped so that they pony down on your €110 collectors edition, so that they stay subscribed until the very end, the very end which by the way just happened to coincidentally coincide just a few months with the timing of their console launch and then open a crown store that offers everything (including a recoloured version of the 'exclusive senche mount' and even the then exclusive and no longer exclusive mudcrab pet) to screw your early supporters over extra hard and give everyone else the chance to get basically the same thing, of course for money.
Its all incredibly and intentionally, intelligently manipulative. If you can not see it, you are blind.
If you still love the game, good for you. I never disliked the game to be honest, I just dislike Zenimax' business practices.
You can keep defending them until the very end, it will find you in the same place as everyone else. Screwed with your butt in the air, sore, and wondering what happened and how it all went wrong.
To be perfectly honest, lately I am just fed up with mmos in general. "Back in the day" the mmo industry produced quality games with very few bugs and good game play. They actually tried. Now? Now they have fools (I am one of those fools) that fall for their hype and pay for something before its released, even PAY TO BETA TEST FOR THEM which is ridiculous. Nothing is how it used to be and the business model that mmos currently push is not sustainable, its killing the industry.
verenkutoja wrote: »From the previous threads;
--
NOTE: the citation for them promising to not come off the subscription model were later found here
I stand by all I have said. This is an intelligent design, nothing they have done have been by chance or 'coincidence', Zenimax have actively and intelligently and repeatedly screwed their customer base over, lied to them outright, and abused the good faith of their players time and time again, offering their fake smiles and 'happy' customer support in response while giving no real solution to the problem.
Same tired dance of other mmos. I still think I was a fool to have hope in Zenimax and expect something better.
I don't really care one way or the other, but I think it's too early to tell. They are redoing the way the loot drops, what drops, and how gems are acquired. I think with enough tinkering, it'll be fine. That's what the PTS is for and for once, they listened to our feedback. Let's see what the next version is before grabbing the pitchforks or celebrating their creation.
The "next version" will be live in game and the changes they are going to make will do little to improve the worth of the boxes or decrease the amount of money players have to spend to get something worthwhile. Spending an inordinate amount of money before getting something decent is why gambling crates exist, and if they were to change them to suddenly become fair, they wouldn't be serving their purpose.
As I said on the PTS thread, any feedback ZOS claims to have taken to heart and any changes they make were most likely approved ahead of time. They won't conpromise the money-making integrity of the boxes, as that's all they exist to do. If they were trying to provide the player base with new options, the crate items could have been added directly to the crown store. The feedback threads and promised changes were just for show.
Yes there are. However, they all feel kinda slow or dated. Also they are not elder scrolls which is the main reason I started playing this one. Just because it's a new trend doesn't mean it's a good one.Whatzituyah wrote: »
Well is there any great MMO's that don't follow this trend? Please no advertising just yes or no but you can PM me a list.
I received a reply to my earlier response from Petyr at ZOS:
"Thank you for the feedback. I'll pass this along to the dev team. I appreciate you sharing it with me, it shows that you WERE very passionate about the game."
I responded,
Fixed the quote.
Petyr, to be very clear about why this devious selling tactic is so disheartening, I would have quite happily purchased many of the items available on the new Crown Gem part of the store had they been offered as straight-up purchases; like I have for the past year and a half (check your records, I'm sure you'll find my investment to be significant). But it wasn't enough apparently, and I need to be fooled out of giving more money, and not necessarily (edit: not likely) getting what I desired. How long will it be before Skill Lines and DLCs find their way into these crates? It doesn't have to be "pay to win" items, these crates will limit variety in all aspects of the game, not just cosmetics/aesthetics.
Whoever green-lighted this decision is someone I will never support again, and that is not an RNG box, you may consider that an absolute.
I feel great sympathy for those who have to be on the front line defending this filth. Please know that my ire is not meant for customer service representatives or the fine folks developing the actual game content. It is completely reserved for the gold-sickness-stricken stockholder-sycophant managers that think it's perfectly fine to gouge their player base of every coin, without any guarantee of them actually receiving what they wanted in return. It's thievery, and may Sheogorath himself come up with a most fitting curse for the remainder of their existence. Something akin to being transformed into a block of Colovian cheddar and being eternally gnawed on by skeevers...
Mandragora wrote: »I wish ZOS would consider other possibilities how to improve their market shop and multiple their goods there, like by dividing the current cosmetic to more of pieces - players wanted to have more complex cosmetic system by letting them choose different parts of body - you can use it for more complex offers in your shop. Players even asked for possibility to have different tops/pants/gloves/hats/shoes. Please, before going into extremes, think more about such possibilities and implement them first, above any predatory mechanics, that will lead into negative reputation and thus lack of payment in any area.
I haven't really read up on them. Are these things similar to the Black Lion boxes that drop in the world in GW2 for which you have to buy keys to unlock?
Is there anything in these boxes that would give you an unfair advantage over other players that don't purchase them?
That's where I draw the line personally. I'm not worried about costumes and mounts but if they start dropping exclusive end-game quality gear in them then it becomes pay to win.
What I dislike the most is the amount of non-themed collectibles that are in those crates (or they seem to be in there on the pts).
Also I thought the crates were announced as a chance to get collectibles that were once but are no longer in the crownstore with a small chance of getting a special mount, but the majority of the items seem to be new?
FireCowCommando wrote: »4% positive, 17% neutral, 77% negative.
100% a feature that took a huge amount of hours of coding, artwork, and game developer design to decide how to implement this system.
There is at least a small chance that ZoS will take the Crown Crate failure to heart, and change the way they plan to introduce housing into the game, but i doubt it.
lordrichter wrote: »
That 4% is what ZOS probably calls a "good start". Once Crates are introduced, that 4% will grow handsomely as new players just consider it normal for a cheap knock-off MMO to offer them, and a way for them to pay to catch up to those older players that remain.
I worked for more than 30 years in a global industrial B2B service business, and got regular trainings, mostly Business to Consumer tweaked to B2B and "completed" with interesting B2B cases, because so little is available on Service Business to Business.
And that marketing knowledge is also a bit dusty....
but from what I remember, any positive user acceptance percentage below 15% is real bad,
and 3 or 4% is in the zone of a so called "fatal error".
More likely, they will interpret it as "hey, over 20% of the players don't hate the crate, we can tweak it a little and get enough sales that the other 80% won't matter!"FireCowCommando wrote: »4% positive, 17% neutral, 77% negative.
100% a feature that took a huge amount of hours of coding, artwork, and game developer design to decide how to implement this system.
There is at least a small chance that ZoS will take the Crown Crate failure to heart, and change the way they plan to introduce housing into the game, but i doubt it.
AmberLaTerra wrote: »
Unfortunately I must say in reply to my long e-mail about cancling my sub and listing the reasons why these crates are bad and sever ways how they could be made bearable (only costing 100 crowns with a sure mount within 2500 crowns and so forth) if we indeed have to suffer them though stating over all just not adding them at all would be the ideal solution. I got the exact same reply from Petyr so I must assume it may just be the cookie cutter answer.
I hope I am wrong but it looks like that is all it is.
Well, for what it's worth the reply I got from Petyr was definitely not a cookie-cutter answer. I think they are reading the feedback in emails (and hopefully the feedback on the forums too). Whether the people on the crown crate team are actually making any changes based on that feedback is anybody's guess.AmberLaTerra wrote: »
Unfortunately I must say in reply to my long e-mail about cancling my sub and listing the reasons why these crates are bad and sever ways how they could be made bearable (only costing 100 crowns with a sure mount within 2500 crowns and so forth) if we indeed have to suffer them though stating over all just not adding them at all would be the ideal solution. I got the exact same reply from Petyr so I must assume it may just be the cookie cutter answer.
I hope I am wrong but it looks like that is all it is.
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |