Weren't Argo's genetically engineered by their sentient tree overlords? I would think that the trees would be the daedra.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »Is Nirn but one more realm of Oblivion?
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »What is the difference between Nirn (mortal realm) and realms of oblivion? I'd say they are one and the same, except Nirn was created collectively on a much larger scale.
The hist came from a realm of oblivion, they were created by a daedric lord so in a way yes, both the hist and Argonians are daedra. But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »Weren't Argo's genetically engineered by their sentient tree overlords? I would think that the trees would be the daedra.
Well, we know Daedra can take on many forms. The Hist may be a sort of major-Daedra with Argonians being a minor-Daedra akin to Dremora.
Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
Argonians are hatched from eggs, which is a point to address in your hypothesis. I am not versed enough in Argonian biology to tell if the eggs are born of Argonians or the Hist, but I can tell they are incubated near the Hist. If Argonians are daedra, then they do not follow the same rules as dremora in rebirth, but then when are daedra consistent?ShedsHisTail wrote: »Is Nirn but one more realm of Oblivion?
Nirn is in the mortal plane of Oblivion, known as Mundus. Nirn seems to encompass all of Mundus, so the terms are generally synonymous. However Mundus and Nirn are not the same. Somehow. That distinction is still unclear to this scholar.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »What is the difference between Nirn (mortal realm) and realms of oblivion? I'd say they are one and the same, except Nirn was created collectively on a much larger scale.
The hist came from a realm of oblivion, they were created by a daedric lord so in a way yes, both the hist and Argonians are daedra. But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
You are referring to Sithis?
or someone else?
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
Daedra is elvish for "not our ancestors" and Aedra is "our ancestors." The two terms are not interchangeable and cannot be used to reference the inhabitants of Nirn.ShedsHisTail wrote: »Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
The "Prince" of Mundus are the Eight Divines: Akatosh, Stendarr, Julianos, Mara, Zenithar, Dibella, Arkay and Kynareth. These Eight Et'Ada gave up their immortal status to create Nirn and mortals, gifting our plane with the coveted spark of creation. The daedra lack the ability to create, so they seek and imitate mortals.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
Daedra is elvish for "not our ancestors" and Aedra is "our ancestors." The two terms are not interchangeable and cannot be used to reference the inhabitants of Nirn.ShedsHisTail wrote: »Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
The "Prince" of Mundus are the Eight Divines: Akatosh, Stendarr, Julianos, Mara, Zenithar, Dibella, Arkay and Kynareth. These Eight Et'Ada gave up their immortal status to create Nirn and mortals, gifting our plane with the coveted spark of creation. The daedra lack the ability to create, so they seek and imitate mortals.
Argonians seem a little off from Dremora in behavior and constitution. The Hist do stem from Sithis, so Argonians do have Daedra in the lineage, but of all the things I know of Dremora and all the things I know of Argonians, they don't quite match up. Namely in the retention of past lives and the ability to create.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »But in the end all beings in TES universe are a creation of Aedra or Daedra (both the same = Et'Ada) so all could be called daedra.
It's just a matter of terminology.
Daedra is elvish for "not our ancestors" and Aedra is "our ancestors." The two terms are not interchangeable and cannot be used to reference the inhabitants of Nirn.ShedsHisTail wrote: »Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
The "Prince" of Mundus are the Eight Divines: Akatosh, Stendarr, Julianos, Mara, Zenithar, Dibella, Arkay and Kynareth. These Eight Et'Ada gave up their immortal status to create Nirn and mortals, gifting our plane with the coveted spark of creation. The daedra lack the ability to create, so they seek and imitate mortals.
Both Daedra and Aedra are one species, both are Et'Ada, that's my point. The only difference is how they were named by mortal races later on. No idea where you got the idea that Daedra cannot create as they posses the same powers as Aedra once did, except the Aedra used almost all their power to create Nirn while Daedra refused to contribute so they maintained all their original power.
Since Argonians were created by the hist who were created by the daedra, they can be called daedra. (all creatures the daedric princes create are called daedra, be it lesser or otherwise)
The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
Well, if we accept that the Hist are non-native to Nirn, we can throw out the idea of Nirn as another plane of Oblivion.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
Well, if we accept that the Hist are non-native to Nirn, we can throw out the idea of Nirn as another plane of Oblivion.
How's that? Your conclusion makes no sense as planes of oblivion are akin to parallel universes. There's not just one plane of oblivion.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
Well, if we accept that the Hist are non-native to Nirn, we can throw out the idea of Nirn as another plane of Oblivion.
How's that? Your conclusion makes no sense as planes of oblivion are akin to parallel universes. There's not just one plane of oblivion.
It was in reply to your statement that calling Nirn a plane of Oblivion is an over simplification.
It either is or isn't, it doesn't matter how complex that description is. So which context are we working from?
Is Nirn a plane of Oblivion? Or no?
Argonians seem a little off from Dremora in behavior and constitution. The Hist do stem from Sithis, so Argonians do have Daedra in the lineage, but of all the things I know of Dremora and all the things I know of Argonians, they don't quite match up. Namely in the retention of past lives and the ability to create.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
Well, if we accept that the Hist are non-native to Nirn, we can throw out the idea of Nirn as another plane of Oblivion.
How's that? Your conclusion makes no sense as planes of oblivion are akin to parallel universes. There's not just one plane of oblivion.
It was in reply to your statement that calling Nirn a plane of Oblivion is an over simplification.
It either is or isn't, it doesn't matter how complex that description is. So which context are we working from?
Is Nirn a plane of Oblivion? Or no?
You're confusing me with Legoless ^^
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »Argonians seem a little off from Dremora in behavior and constitution. The Hist do stem from Sithis, so Argonians do have Daedra in the lineage, but of all the things I know of Dremora and all the things I know of Argonians, they don't quite match up. Namely in the retention of past lives and the ability to create.
@Ffastyl how do you get Daedra in the lineage from Sithis? He's associated with Lorkhan.
josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »Weren't Argo's genetically engineered by their sentient tree overlords? I would think that the trees would be the daedra.
Well, we know Daedra can take on many forms. The Hist may be a sort of major-Daedra with Argonians being a minor-Daedra akin to Dremora.
Incidentally, this theory also implies a Daedric Prince which lords over the realm of Nirn.
There are several, ever heard of the eight Aedra? They are the same as Daedra (translated as "not our ancestors"), except they are Called Aedra (our ancestors) because they created Nirn.
SlappyThePoptart wrote: »Nirn is not a plane of Oblivion. Oblivion was created by the Daedra, Nirn was made by the Aedra. However, I like the idea. I always thought mortals were the Aedric counter to the Lesser Daedra, because they are descended from the Et-Ada and return to Aetherius when they die (unless a Daedra claims their soul lol).
ShedsHisTail wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »josefcifkaeb17_ESO wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »The Hist definitely seem to come from Oblivion, and Argonian souls return to the Hist in death. Whether Argonians are Daedra or simply uplifted lizards isn't readily apparent.
Calling Nirn a realm of Oblivion is a horrible oversimplification though. Don't do that.
Well, if we accept that the Hist are non-native to Nirn, we can throw out the idea of Nirn as another plane of Oblivion.
How's that? Your conclusion makes no sense as planes of oblivion are akin to parallel universes. There's not just one plane of oblivion.
It was in reply to your statement that calling Nirn a plane of Oblivion is an over simplification.
It either is or isn't, it doesn't matter how complex that description is. So which context are we working from?
Is Nirn a plane of Oblivion? Or no?
You're confusing me with Legoless ^^
Yes I am.
I guess, my line of thinking (with that statement) is that if we're going to divide realms down Aedric and Daedric lines, then Oblivion would consist of the various Daedric realms... Coldharbor and such. Nirn, being a product of Aedric intervention/creation would exist outside of that... As something else.
So if we assume that the Hist are Daedric invaders (refugees?) from Oblivion, then there's no reason to assume that Nirn must be -part- of Oblivion in order to house the (apparently) Daedric Hist... Since they're non-native.
I was just reconciling things so we could get back to the original theory regarding the nature of Argonians.