FearlessOne_2014 wrote: »The main question I asks my self everyday for the past 2 weeks is. Will I buy another MMO period. The past 3 or 4 MMO I've played over the past 4 years have left me feeling down and out. The lack of choice for the genre is another turn off for me buying another MMO. As in Dev teams now don't have to make quality MMOs these days, they just have to release something with a little of something others don't have. And sadly people swarm all over it like brainless hive-minds. I more less looking into the "free aim third person view MOBA" genre atm.
I'm a PvPer that hate to PvE but will force himself to do it, only if it'll make me happy. But the standard the PvE has become in MMOs to force players to PvE just to be decent at PvP if not overpowered. I think I'm done with killing the same set of NPC 10000 times over, done it for 15 plus years now, it's getting old. I just want to kill other players in a Massive World PvP or Sandbox PvP that don't require farming NPCs forever.
I'm also a old school person who don't beat around the bush and speak my mind. So that also puts me at odds with this new generation of gamers, where no matter how much they suck it's impolite to correct them. I'm not nearly as hardcore as I used to be about a year ago, so that puts me at odds with the players from that group.
Honestly I just don't think their is a place for me in modern day MMOs. And I'm fine with that. Just means I'll have to find some thing else to bring enjoyment to my life. CU and Star Citizens will more then likely be the last MMOs I will ever play.
WanderingJarlPuncher wrote: »FearlessOne_2014 wrote: »The main question I asks my self everyday for the past 2 weeks is. Will I buy another MMO period. The past 3 or 4 MMO I've played over the past 4 years have left me feeling down and out. The lack of choice for the genre is another turn off for me buying another MMO. As in Dev teams now don't have to make quality MMOs these days, they just have to release something with a little of something others don't have. And sadly people swarm all over it like brainless hive-minds. I more less looking into the "free aim third person view MOBA" genre atm.
I'm a PvPer that hate to PvE but will force himself to do it, only if it'll make me happy. But the standard the PvE has become in MMOs to force players to PvE just to be decent at PvP if not overpowered. I think I'm done with killing the same set of NPC 10000 times over, done it for 15 plus years now, it's getting old. I just want to kill other players in a Massive World PvP or Sandbox PvP that don't require farming NPCs forever.
I'm also a old school person who don't beat around the bush and speak my mind. So that also puts me at odds with this new generation of gamers, where no matter how much they suck it's impolite to correct them. I'm not nearly as hardcore as I used to be about a year ago, so that puts me at odds with the players from that group.
Honestly I just don't think their is a place for me in modern day MMOs. And I'm fine with that. Just means I'll have to find some thing else to bring enjoyment to my life. CU and Star Citizens will more then likely be the last MMOs I will ever play.
(...)
it's not that you are out of place, its just that the gaming system needs to feed their babies with the right type of baby food before realising that they fed them the wrong food by killing online gaming completly
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »I voted no, not because I'm an Eso hater but the way ZoS handles things is unprofessional, no transparency, inability to handle hackers and exploiters and they seem happy to ignore the tons of issues/bugs in game but still release boring dlc that creates more issues and bugs.
They should feel lucky that there's not much competition out there atm.
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »I voted no, not because I'm an Eso hater but the way ZoS handles things is unprofessional, no transparency, inability to handle hackers and exploiters and they seem happy to ignore the tons of issues/bugs in game but still release boring dlc that creates more issues and bugs.
They should feel lucky that there's not much competition out there atm.
Those 2 last DLCs are not boring content, but iconic guilds in the TES lore - they had to be in the game to be a real TES game. And there will be more TES content in future, if you expect something else, you are not likely to get that.
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »I voted no, not because I'm an Eso hater but the way ZoS handles things is unprofessional, no transparency, inability to handle hackers and exploiters and they seem happy to ignore the tons of issues/bugs in game but still release boring dlc that creates more issues and bugs.
They should feel lucky that there's not much competition out there atm.
Those 2 last DLCs are not boring content, but iconic guilds in the TES lore - they had to be in the game to be a real TES game. And there will be more TES content in future, if you expect something else, you are not likely to get that.
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »I voted no, not because I'm an Eso hater but the way ZoS handles things is unprofessional, no transparency, inability to handle hackers and exploiters and they seem happy to ignore the tons of issues/bugs in game but still release boring dlc that creates more issues and bugs.
They should feel lucky that there's not much competition out there atm.
Those 2 last DLCs are not boring content, but iconic guilds in the TES lore - they had to be in the game to be a real TES game. And there will be more TES content in future, if you expect something else, you are not likely to get that.
Those two guilds should have been in the game from the start, but Zenimax ran out of money during the development stage, why they released the game when they did and with so many bugs.
rosendoichinoveb17_ESO wrote: »This topic is a bit misleading. Do you consider the regular TES games as ZOS games (Morrowind,Oblivion,Skyrim)? Because even though they are developed by another studio "Bethesda", they are still considered ZOS games. Because Bethesda is owned by Zenimax.
driosketch wrote: »I'm just here for Elder Scrolls, and I'd probably buy the next game even if EA was publishing.
Nightingale1176 wrote: »I hope if Bethesda decides to make another ES MMO game they pick another company.
Ourorboros wrote: »Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »I voted no, not because I'm an Eso hater but the way ZoS handles things is unprofessional, no transparency, inability to handle hackers and exploiters and they seem happy to ignore the tons of issues/bugs in game but still release boring dlc that creates more issues and bugs.
They should feel lucky that there's not much competition out there atm.
Those 2 last DLCs are not boring content, but iconic guilds in the TES lore - they had to be in the game to be a real TES game. And there will be more TES content in future, if you expect something else, you are not likely to get that.
You honestly didn't find them boring or even disappointing? Even some of the biggest fans have commented on the lack of content that comes with recent DLC's. Either way my point still stands that they are releasing new content over fixing current issues, not only that but performance seems at least to me to get worse after each dlc and more bugs are added to the list.