Enemoriana wrote: »

katanagirl1 wrote: »

OK I see what you mean. If they updated the resolution for the old style you would still use it and it would look different than the newer one, right? There are many older styles that I like better but if I try to mix and match with newer styles they just don’t work. So I think essentially you are agreeing with me in your last sentence if you do not like the Ancestral version.

Everything depends on how style is updated.
Texture, only material details? Quite safe.
Texture, adding more item details? Can change too much. As example, I like those imperial armor exactly for being simple, without bunch of decorative things.
Mesh? Absolutely not safe, it has very high chance to change things somebody like, because even small change of chests form can drastically change how it looks on character. A bit safer with other parts, but still.

Would I use updated imperial armor? Nobody knows until exact armor is equipped on exact character.

I am advocating just a resolution update, no changes other than that. Of course it is up to them to implement it and as we all know we don’t always get exactly what we ask for. I thought the base zone update was just resolution but they did add things, though nothing that bothers me. This is probably at the bottom of the list of their priorities anyway.

Having to visit him every time is the reason I've never taken that perk.

Zodiarkslayer wrote: »

Vulkunne wrote: »

Actually, I think NB is in a pretty good place as it exists today, that includes the animations as well. ...

Excuse me, but what game are you playing? 😅

Bloody idiotic! This has to change!

A game with a stealth class that works. It can always be worse. If we must judge the upcoming class refresh by what they've done with the DK, then that means nerfs will accompany any new class refresh. Right now, you have a good NB class with crisp, awesome animations and a toolkit that works if you know what you're doing. My NBs dominate in both Cyrodiily and IC with prejudice. That said, look how badly they screwed up Jabs, Flurry animations with no correction... after years now.

I think it's a bad idea for this studio to try and reset animations and so I don't think they have the talent to get it right or the down-to-earth mentality to know when not to try too hard. Just like with Jabs and Flurry, they def never took responsibility for those screw ups. So why would I want them resetting animations on any other class for that reason? People who don't take accountability should not be completely relied on to do a decent job. And that goes for me also if I stop caring as well. Are there some things that ZOS does well, absolutely and those things speak for themselves. But not animations or feedback.

That aside, I need nothing from anyone and there is no expectation for others to bend for me. Every time I login to PvP a certain faction cringes at the site of my Argonian NB and from what follows. If you want something else, then play as something else. There is absolutely no sense or logic in trying to fix what already works well. There's always a meta clone which can be made easily but then you're copying what alot of people are already doing. But that gets old, doesn't it?

I play Argonian frequently in PvP and I dunno... their racial passives right now seem to be rather nice. They used to be stronger and so yeah, I'd love to see a buff to what we already have. There are a couple races that already be eatin' good.

Argonians have always been the primary depiction for nightblades, so it makes perfect sense to give them 8% crit chance as a racial passive.

Haki_7 wrote: »

Chaosball 1, impossible to lose. We almost did because

Haki_7 wrote: »

Domination, impossible to lose. We did because

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you're writing stuff like this for over 30 pages? These hyperboles only serve to undermine whatever it is you're trying to say.


impossible
/ɪmˈpɒsɪbl/
adjective
not able to occur, exist, or be done.

While I agree that the issue being raised in this thread is far more serious than zone advertisments, I also get while people find them annoying...and I say this as GM of a guild that has done zone chat recruiting (as sparingly as possible) since launch. Zone recruiting WORKS, really well (especially for new guilds and trade guilds) or guilds wouldn't be doing it.

A lot of solid suggestions have been made to improve recruiting / alleviate the annoyance:

- Add a "Guild Recruiting" channel that can be toggled off like any other channel and then make guild recruiting advertisments against the TOS in other public channels. Honestly, I'd rather only people interested in joining a guild see those zone chat messages.

- Add an "Apply to this guild" button at kiosks. (I know AGS adds the "I" icon but I don't think base game has that?)

- With the upcoming Guild Tag display system, add "About Guild" choice to the player interaction wheel if the guild has an active application posted.

Improve the Guild Finder in ways like:
- Adding pagination so people can view all guilds that match the search filter instead of a random limited selection.
- A search box that allows for searches by guild name and keywords.

Guild advertisements are not spamming guild invites. Invites are sent to individual players and require a reply. Guild advertisements don't and are only giving information about their guild to the public.

I offered a solution for being able to not see guild advertisements in the chat window, but only as a quality of life feature, not because it's harassment.