I 100% agree with both. Having an in game polling system where a larger percentage of players can interact with it would be hugely beneficial. It’d need to be more specific and I feel like hours invested in the game should trump ESO+ subscription

Legendary mode for ESO would also be fantastic

Posting on the forums is also likely to attract the same 5 ish people that poo poo everything btw :-)

Your suggestion has done wonders for OSRS and could only benefit the game in my opinion.

Good communication IMO.

I put the livestream date on my calendar. If a truckload of new orginal content is coming I will stay on the train. If there is another year of ‘reimagined old content’ I will probably skip a year and catch up at some point during a sale of a month of ESO+

It would be kind-of cool to have this is Cyrodiil too. Group Keep Recall Stones for 100k AP would be nice.

Iriidius wrote: »

Artisian0001 wrote: »

StihlReign wrote: »

Small comped groups and experienced tanks don't typically sit directly on Rams in GH. They climb onto the ledge and siege from there. They'll let you burn 3 Rams, by then the door is either open or a few hits with a couple of Ballistas and it's done.

If they're not doing it this way, the group is typically inexperienced, immune to damage or doesn't really care if they get in. We asked the devs to address the ledge, similar to the bridge damage immunity... ~crickets

You can still be hit with siege from the ledge, this is a moot point. The vast majority of keeps have no spot where you can sit and not be hit by oils while ramming the door.

Maybe someone manages to setup and aim a single oil to hit players at the ledge and another for other ledge which you should still be able to outheal but you definitely cant hit players at the ledge with all 6 oils you can setup around grid.
And as group in voichchat it is also possible to have half your group run into ram only when it rams and stay out the other time.
Oil might still kill solobuilds but not ballgroups in this short time.
I never saw a keep that a ballgroup couldn’t take because maingate was oiled.

That's great and all but just like the comments before you, you aren't addressing what's being said, and to the surprise of nobody, the framing is also awful. You can hit them with a single oil? Be realistic, it just makes your argument look weak. You can hit them with more than just one and even if it was just one, which more are possible, but even if I grant you that incorrect point, you still aren't addressing the fact that it pushes them off the door which is my exact point. This statement alone "I never saw a keep that a ballgroup couldn’t take because maingate was oiled." is a lie or you've seen a ballgroup on a ram like twice in your life. You have NEVER seen a ballgroup leave because maingate was oiled? Be realistic, this is a horrible line of conversation.

Balance means that you can play a wide variety of builds without worrying that you're clearly less effective than others around you. Playing for fun doesn't mean you want to be doing a pathetic amount of damage compared to everyone on your team.

ZOS_Kevin wrote: »

acastanza_ESO wrote: »

Excluding those who rejected Vengeance but continued to play in Grey Host also skews your data towards those who view Vengeance positively. Kinda invalidating for the survey ngl.

The survey is about the viability of this version of Vengeance for those who played. If someone did not play Vengeance in this test, you can't really speak to that. So it isn't skewing data based on the general theme of request.

It's not about skewing Vengeance positively. Folks who participated in the campaign can still tell us that the did not like what they played. And if you participated in both Gray Host and Vengeance, that feedback is being captured as well.

If the survey is about the viability of Vengeance then why were there so many questions about Greyhost? If I recall correctly, one question even asked what campaign did you participate in(?). Which from there if you answered Greyhost you’d think all the questions following would pertain to Greyhost. It’s very very hard to trust this is a genuine inquiry on the viability of Vengeance when it was tailored more around the specific campaign you played, which in most cases would be Greyhost.

Why is something as simple as a survey confusing and feel like a trick? Sheesh.

I’d also like to point out that as soon as Greyhost was back, I participated in real Cyrodiil and it was popping, I enjoyed myself, plenty of peeps online and just thought you should know that

Please add this to your data, much appreciated because I didn’t get a survey to vent my frustration towards this abomination

Much love ❤️

Nostalgia reasons for morrowind. Also, going into a tiny clockwork city is just awesome!

This is the official discussion thread for, "ESO Leadership’s 2025 End-of-Year Letters to the Community"

"Read three letters from ESO’s leadership team where they discuss learnings from a busy year and set the tone and expectations for 2026.

ZeniMax Online Studios Studio Head Jo Burba, ESO Game Director Nick Giacomini, and Executive Producer Susan Kath share their thoughts on a challenging 2025 and their early plans for the year to come."