
CameraBeardThePirate wrote: »ZOS was very upfront about needing to group up for this event.
That's not correct. The statement was that it would be hard to solo, so one would probably prefer to follow some other players along. That's not the same as saying "group content". So people had different expectations, obviously.
There was also a statement that it was an attempt at a "soft grouping zone" - which is understood at just tagging along with others who randomly show up - basically like it had been with the Writhing Fortress last year, where you absolutely neither needed a pre-organized group nor use some grouping tool, you could just run with the masses. So also that led to different expectations.
Aces-High-82 wrote: »Aces-High-82 wrote: »Thats not what I wrote at all lol. 20% of encounters (thats vs competent ppl) end up in a stalemate or lag rngjesus swings the favor to one side.
Maybe you misread/misinterpreted that?
No, I understood what you meant. What I wanted to say is that you are using the word "competent" and "perfect" interchangably, which is not true. Just because they are competent players doesn't mean they won't eventually make mistakes. I've had a fair share of stalemate duels vs competent players and the only reason those stalemates even happened was because both of us built tanky enough to survive each other's one shot combo. When a 1 shot combo is powerful enough to 100-0 someone, it is only a matter of time before one person finally dies from a mistake or like you said, lag rngjesus.
True. And thats my point CoE should stay as it is. Ys made very clear how potent Ardent is. The pureclass masteries have at least be feasible to compete.
acanca