SteveCampsOut wrote: »Alpha_Protocol wrote: »
Maybe just try a little harder?
No offense to you and your awesome wife, but maybe you could learn to, oh you know, give some helpful advice to people who struggle instead of belittling their efforts? I died to Molag Bal for 16 hour straight trying every combination of skills I had but it wasn't until I was given some good advice and respec'd to add two necessary skills that I succeeded in defeating him. Sometimes, it just takes a community!
Do you have one - a logical argument against player choice, that is? If you do, then you'll have been the very first to successfully present one.
So consider it a personal challenge from me to you: I dare you to present a logical argument against allowing players to choice to maintain grouping in instances where it is currently prohibited. I double-dog dare you.
But I have, from the start:Alpha_Protocol wrote: »This is your thread. If we're going to all of the sudden begin to entertain logic, perhaps you should start.
Mentioned that, only because I saw a stream of inter-web speak that meant nothing more than gibberish to me. If folks older than me are engaged in it, then guess I really do belong in the 1940s.Alpha_Protocol wrote: »Mid 40's? Bah, been there done that
For instance, if I find trials too frustrating, I should be able to bring 35 of my best buddies - without changing the rewards or scaling up the trial, of course. Why would anyone oppose that? It won't affect your ability to do the trial with a group of 12!
frwinters_ESO wrote: »OP your just a troll. Your name has appeared on other threads about this same dam topic. Unhappy just move on and leave everyone else alone.
men are better at taking "fix it" instructions from women, than vice versa.
frwinters_ESO wrote: »OP your just a troll.
Personal attack.frwinters_ESO wrote: »OP your just a troll. Your name has appeared on other threads about this same dam topic. Unhappy just move on and leave everyone else alone.