That's a bold statement. Any factual evidence to back that up?
Well now you can purchase the gold edition with all the DLC for what... 20 bucks? Something like that. I mean yes the correct terminology is B2P, but 20 bucks is really cheap to experience the entirety of Tamriel.
It's difficult to demonstrate unless you've been a part of an MMO community where it has happened and have witnessed it first hand. Basically try any MMO with a crate system and behold as the majority of the "new content" is a trickle feed of items being jammed into crates. STO is my personal example. All of the newest and most highly sought after ships are stuffed into crates. The latest "expansion" was basically just a slightly different way to create a new character that still leads into the existing content. They added new "episodes" (missions) to play, but many of them came AFTER the launch of the expansion. Klingons and Romulans haven't seen any meaningful content updates in ages, and no talk has occurred of adding another race.
I tried The Old Republic after it went F2P and found the restrictions to be ridiculous (having to pay to wear purple gear? kiss my butt), and have seen multiple reports stating that the addition of more content has slowed considerably since their Cartel crates were introduced.
If you think about it, it makes perfect sense. If the players are supplementing your revenue just from buying crates, what incentive is there to take all the time and effort necessary to develop legitimate content?
Sure the people that only design pets, and mounts and stuff can easily now just turn them into crate stuff, because the interface is already there. So yes before you go there that is a possibility. But mounts and pets don't create an in game barrier between players because neither of those things give others a one up from the next.
When the gold edition launched on steam it was 19.99, I remember because i had just bought all the DLC outright and then they release the gold edition WITH all the DLC and i remember not being too happy about that.
You're missing my point. My concern isn't about the barriers or the price of the game or who has what special mounts that I don't have. My one and only concern is whether the presence of crates will help or hurt the creation of future content. Trends indicate the latter.
They're a 250 man team. I doubt the crates, which took them like 6-8 months or more to finalize, took more than 1/10th of that team in total
Sure, but we need to make sure that they don't make so much money off of the crates that they let half of the dev team go and focus more and more on the crate content as time goes on. Less employees = larger profit margins, and if you're making the majority of your money through crate content, what's the incentive to keep paying a lot of people to keep adding meaningful updates?
Waffennacht wrote: »Why aren't you guys yelling at Neverwinter, Vegas, Black Hawk, The lotto or any other thing that has these exact things?
It's simple, you have poor chances, but everyone already knows that.
My friend keeps telling me, "it's the internet, complaining is what it does."
Edit: I just thought of this, and I think it rather clever, "An addict is someone that is unable to turn their habit into a profession."
TequilaFire wrote: »
I know exactly what I am purchasing, a chance to get something with useless crowns I get every month that accumulate with no use for. I did not spend one dollar over what I pay for my monthly subscription anyway.
I feel sorry for the few who can not control their impulses and over buy such items, but some of us can enjoy a beer or a glass of wine without drinking the whole case.
I worked over 30 years owning my own company so I can retire and do what I want, and thank goodness I can.
Now if we could only convert AP to Gems!
Stopnaggin wrote: »
So can I ask you something? And before I get to the question, I'm not totally against the boxes.
Would you have just purchased the items in the boxes if they were offered for a straight price? Or is it the thrill of opening the boxes and not knowing?
I also sub and have bought the crates because of excess crowns, I just prefer to know what I'm buying. To me the investment wasn't worth the 5000 crowns, although I have nothing else to spend them on at the moment.
And I will explain this is not sarcasm as I'm actually interested in the answer.
If you're making the majority of your money through crate content, what's the incentive to keep paying a lot of people to keep adding meaningful updates?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
Because people want the shiny stuff to show it off in the game, but there needs to be stuff to do in the game in order to show it off... Without new content, people will stop playing and therefore stop buying shiny things too ?
Just trying to be logical here.
lordrichter wrote: »
This is true, but my concern is that when the GAME is what is paying the bills, management needs to be doing things that will make people pay for the game. This is increasingly not the situation with ESO. With ESO, the financial purpose of the game is becoming more and more to bring players to the Crown Store.
It is not necessary to make the best game possible when this is what the purpose of the game is. New content only needs to be just average enough to not drive players away.
Well the thing that brings players to play the game is the content, not the store. Nobody is buying the game to just buy things from the store, they buy the game to play it. The stuff in the store is an added bonus that isn't required to play the content.
raidentenshu_ESO wrote: »
This question wasn't directly at me, but I am going to answer it anyways.
The point of me buying crowns with my RL money is to purchase items from the store that I actually want, directly. I don't find it a thrill of opening boxes that will give me random junk that I don't need. This game, ESO, is quite known for the poor RNG... It is a large flaw within the game itself. If I struggle to find the proper BIS gear due to RNG .... How else am I suppose to entrust the crown crate RNG system to give me items that is worthy?
I don't plan on purchasing $100 +++ on a mount that I'm probably wont even get due to the *** poor RNG.
The regulation comes from China's Ministry of Culture, via NeoGAF, and states that "online game publishers shall promptly publicly announce information about the name, property, content, quantity, and draw/forge probability of all virtual items and services.
"The information on draw probability shall be true and effective."
a close call ? http://www.pcgamesn.com/china-loot-box-regulations (china government gonna force all companies to provide chances for items in "loot boxes"
Well this is an interesting turn of events. Here's the official regulation from the Chinese government, Google translate does a pretty good job with it.
Your move ZOS.
Just seen this on massively:
http://massivelyop.com/2016/12/08/china-is-cracking-down-on-mmorpg-lockbox-vendors/
lordrichter wrote: »
a close call ? http://www.pcgamesn.com/china-loot-box-regulations (china government gonna force all companies to provide chances for items in "loot boxes"
China can't control what an American based company does.
China can't control what an American based company does.
Lets not forget that the last Paid DLC ZOS released was Shadows of the Hist I think (?) and how long ago was that??? Then they release One Tamriel and next up is Housing for free in 2+ months. The next Paid DLC probably isnt going to be for another 3 months at least AFTER the Housing update.
It is going to be over a half year in between DLC cash flow for ZOS. These crates will keep large free updates possible along with other large DLCs ( creating all of Vvardenfel aint cheap ). A necessary evil so we all should do our best to live with them. Nothing in them is required for gameplay. Gotta separate our Needs from our Wants.