WalkingLegacy wrote: »Nexus 6p duping
Shadowfx1970 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »Nexus 6p duping
Yeah sorry I didn't think there would be too many people that would remember those but I should have included them.
WalkingLegacy wrote: »Shadowfx1970 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »Nexus 6p duping
Yeah sorry I didn't think there would be too many people that would remember those but I should have included them.
I only got to enjoy Arena because Bethesda gave it away on their website a while ago.
Morrowind had a depth of gameplay and immersion that has not been matched since in my opinion. It's really sad to see Bethesda dumb down the franchise in attempt to appeal to the fickle masses simply to make more money. ESO is an abomination in that respect - it's the most superficial and watered down TES title to date. ZOS is lucky the combat is the best I've played in an MMO, I wouldn't have stuck around otherwise.
Ruze is a veteran of the PC Beta, lived through the year one drought, survived the buy-to-play conversion, and has stepped foot in the hells known as Craglorn. He mained a nightlbade when nightblades weren't good, and has never worn a robe. He converted from PC during the console betas, and hasn't regretted it a moment since.
He'd rank ESO:TU (in it's current state) a 4.8 out of 5, loving the game almost entirely.
After I assassinate everyone in DB I will most likely give Skyrim another go, but I will probably have to re-tool all the add-ons I had, or at least update them, make sure they still work right.
Shadowfx1970 wrote: »I must admit Morrowind was the first in the series I played fully I did have a go at Arena that a friend had, but I missed Daggerfall which I hear was really good too.
They should certainly update and redo some of the classic games.
1) I really hate that phrase... it's in no way true, and in no way a good descriptor for the games changes.Morrowind had a depth of gameplay and immersion that has not been matched since in my opinion. [1]It's really sad to see Bethesda dumb down the franchise in attempt to appeal to the fickle masses simply to make more money. [2]ESO is an abomination in that respect - it's the most superficial and watered down TES title to date. ZOS is lucky the combat is the best I've played in an MMO, I wouldn't have stuck around otherwise.
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »1) I really hate that phrase... it's in no way true, and in no way a good descriptor for the games changes.Morrowind had a depth of gameplay and immersion that has not been matched since in my opinion. [1]It's really sad to see Bethesda dumb down the franchise in attempt to appeal to the fickle masses simply to make more money. [2]ESO is an abomination in that respect - it's the most superficial and watered down TES title to date. ZOS is lucky the combat is the best I've played in an MMO, I wouldn't have stuck around otherwise.
2) That's because ESO is an MMO first, Elder Scrolls second. It's an MMO with an Elder Scrolls theme. If you were thinking of ESO as a regular Elder Scrolls game with some "online" thrown in, then the problem is you and not the game. The development staff were very clear, many times, before/during/after ESO launched that this is not going to be "Morrowind/Oblivion/Skyrim Online". If you were still thinking it was going to be that, then you are the problem, not the game.
Take that as you will, but I think stepping back and getting a bit of perspective might do you some good.