So, projected winners of all campaigns (NA)

Lowbei

yet you did play there, in thidranki, and i was a gm of the guild.

so basically, someone from another server who never played there, talks trash about guilds they never competed against? thats so pathetic lol

so you rolled toons there and pvpd in the bgs, but didnt stay. sounds like you couldnt compete there, no offense, just truth.

Lowbei

Asked my pal in the penguins if you were decent on lance... he laughed.

Rylana

My thread was horribly hijacked

Lowbei

doh!

sorry rylana

Lord_Draevan

Rylana wrote: »

My thread was horribly hijacked

I'd comment something along the lines of "welcome to the internet", but I'm still reeling that >8 people = zerg and is skill-less to Permafrost.

Permafrost

You're completely right. You know my guild better than I do. Thanks for being so obsessed you've kept meticulous notes in order to craft the most accurate history to ever be etched into the tablets of time.

Lowbei

... well... as much as he and i disagree on some things, hes absolutely right about zerging.

if you are running one "group", like most/all skilled groups do, and competing against other skilled "groups" (GvG) then if one of them brings more than a group, thats zerging.

you can argue the fact all you want, but to the competitive crowd, the group that decided to bring extra players to the fight, is zerging, no matter if its 1 player or 50.

Permafrost

I clearly am not a fan of Lowbei at the moment, but he's described it pretty well. It's just the way those of us from the old-school competitive scene see things.

Lowbei

Permafrost wrote: »

You're completely right. You know my guild better than I do. Thanks for being so obsessed you've kept meticulous notes in order to craft the most accurate history to ever be etched into the tablets of time.

it doesnt take meticulous notes to know that your guild never competed on killibury haha.

next time, dont trash talk guilds on other servers you havent played on

Lowbei

... due to our similar views, i find it hard to believe we are at such odds lol

we should gvg sometime perhaps, are you on dc or other?

Permafrost

We're DC.

Dekkameron

Well, i guess it's semi Lore accurate as the Aldmeri Dominion was the only alliance to survive into the Third age onwards.

Lowbei

what a dodge!

lol jk

...oh well

SwampRaider

Chrysamere is/was/sometimes fun.

DC has lost their tactical edge there. Even though we Will win the campaign, I find that i have to reteach people have to pvp(even myself). We were the most coordinated and tactical faction when everyone was 10-49. Then *** hit the fan and we lost our mojo. It really sucks when 50% of your A team quits ESO due to crappy pvp support.

The thing about low pop servers like Volendrung, Chrysamere, Goldbrand etc.. is:

THEY ARE THE BEST SERVERS TO LEARN HOW TO PVP CORRECTLY.

Ifthir_ESO

bbevier_ESO wrote: »

This sums up my fight experience vs the EP on Goldbrand.
http://imgur.com/a/toCNv


*** These stats are since mid May when I installed Codex.
*** I have spent maybe 2 hours tops in any other campaign

That add-on doesn't show the level of the enemy you killed?

So your frag list could be you farming the same level 15 noobs every day?

EDIT: Also your list of kills is about 95% EP or am I crazy? My guess is your guild was on a server where EP was getting owned and you did what I said above, farmed noobs who were outnumbered every day.

Avidus

Ifthir_ESO wrote: »

That add-on doesn't show the level of the enemy you killed?

So your frag list could be you farming the same level 15 noobs every day?

EDIT: Also your list of kills is about 95% EP or am I crazy? My guess is your guild was on a server where EP was getting owned and you did what I said above, farmed noobs who were outnumbered every day.

Actually most of his frag list are VR ranks, and are apart of our guild.
And to be honest, he is on a server where EP own it, and DC get dominated every time they set foot. And I mean absolutely dominated.
That is why these stats mean nothing.
It also doesn't show what role each person does, for example healers, and tanks.
It also does not show what players spend their time doing, such as sieging walls down, being a decoy.
All it shows is a list of deaths.

I am just going to go ahead and mention, we do not take the DC seriously, so we don't play properly against them, I personally will t-bag them in open combat even if it results in my death.
Why?
Because they are too easy.

Cody

yall need to calm down, and drink some mead:)

Leaok

The people on my list are the so called elite EP of Goldbrand. They claim to dominate us but so far all they do is call in overwhelming numbers to deal with the fact they cant handle us at even odds.

Hell they just sent around 25 EP to take a outpost from 7 of us. And only their emp kept them from getting wiped for a second time there.

These EP elite will have a sad day once the campaigns end and they have to deal with odds that are even.

Permafrost

I'm also going to mention we don't take EP seriously, because we absolutely destroy them. Thanks for more AP tonight. It was nice of you to at least own up to that being your guild. The "role" each player does hardly matters when our K/D to your members is roughly 45/5.

I don't care if your a decoy, tank or healer. If we're killing you 9-10 times to every 1 time that you kill us, something tells me you may want to step up your game so you can stop pretending you don't take us seriously and can actually compete against us for a change.

demonlkojipub19_ESO

demonlkojipub19_ESO wrote: »

Venithar wrote: »

demonlkojipub19_ESO wrote: »

What makes you think DC will win on wabba.... also the campaigns are supposed to close before their end times, or so ZoS says.

They never said they were going to close before the end date.

ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »

First and foremost, we want to assure you that any Campaigns we close before their natural shutdown time will properly reward players based on their tier reward, alliance placement, and leaderboard status.

As you can see by the part I bolded, it does not say they will close them, just that the ones they do close, if any, will be properly rewarded.

Cool, still doesn't mean DC is going to win by any power of their own.

Gotta ask again, who thinks DC are going to win on wabbajack now?

Zintair

Who thinks AD ever had a say in who was going to win....

See what I did there?

Where you at Gumbicus? Why so quiet? Too much competition?

Halrloprillalar

Zintair wrote: »

Who thinks AD ever had a say in who was going to win....

See what I did there?

Where you at Gumbicus? Why so quiet? Too much competition?

Hey man, you can lead a horse to water, but...

Rylana

The level of e-peen stroking in this thread has reached Murica on the scale.

Avidus

Rylana wrote: »

The level of e-peen stroking in this thread has reached Murica on the scale.

Its not really e-peen stroking, there is a lot of butthurt here, it just looks a lot of e-peen stroking.

Leaok

Not really E-peen stroking.

You have an EP claiming that because of their guild EP will always win a campaign.
Then you have Perma and I who have debunked that EP by showing how much of a joke his guild actually is.

On a second line you have the Wabba people and they believe that unless its a zerg on zerg fighting than it doesn't matter...

So in total the thread is pointless pretty much like every thread.

Avidus

bbevier_ESO wrote: »

Then you have Perma and I who have debunked that EP by showing how much of a joke his guild actually is.

Jokes you on, you're losing mate.

kenpachi480

Rylana wrote: »

AD will win four (Auriels Bow, Dawnbreaker, Hopesfire, and Skullcrusher)
DC will win three (Bloodthorn, Chrysamere, and Volendrung*)
EP will win one (Goldbrand)

Wabbajack is too close to call, but based on current trends is likely to go to DC for a final score of 4AD, 4DC, 1EP

what you on about EP is 10k ahead of DC> only way DC can get back is if AD helps them. and you cant call it decisive win if thats the case

but sure of what i seen AD is filled with exploiters and cheaters so have a great whoopiererdoopi last few days. #care

FireCowCommando

pretty tiring listening to gold brand drama. Not sure who bbevier is but i always see his name pop up randomly in threads throwing out insults. Can everyone just stop epeening here?

This isn't a KDR competition, even numbered fights are going to be scarce in AvA, point leadership doesn't determine talent, ect.

People are here to have fun, really should stop taking this so seriously. Want to be the person who won the fight here? Then stop bickering with the other person.

Edit: And by the way, this thread was about the current status of the campaigns, its not pointless but informative. You just got caught up in your own drama and lost focus.

Shaggygaming

Lowbei wrote: »

GA? thats really funny, since you people couldnt compete on merlin/killi so you only played bgs there, of which i was (probably still am) a gm of your hib guild on my thidranki eldritch named Tinyshots.

tho to be fair, i dont remember you guys fielding 8 on that server, so saying you "couldnt" compete is a bit mean. you simply "didnt" compete.

tell gundorf i said hi

You mean this troll couldn't even compete in 8 mans? Is Ganked Again like a terribad version of Lagged Again?

Shaggygaming

Lowbei wrote: »

... well on the topic of zerging, he is correct

generally speaking, to the competitive crowd, more than a group is zerging. gvg is the goal. if you brought more, then you are zerging.

Except when we say 2 groups of 12-18 we are sending them to different parts of the map to attack or defend different keeps. We just stay coordinated in one TS for communication.