@ZOS_Kevin
@ZOS_GinaBruno
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom

I don't see the red writing about "investigations"...
Are you guys aware about this issue this evening?

The agent initially believed this name violated policy as it was using proprietary name character from Elder Scrolls Online and issued an educational warning;

You cant name a Guild after a Character in the game?

Nobody at any company should be allowed to change Production data, unless

1) proper JIT elevation is in place (permissions granted only as needed)
2) a 2nd person observes the change as a witness and provides attestation that everything went as expected

This is basic security and privileged access management. So what is going on with ZOS Customer Service?

amiiegee wrote: »

Playstation EU is a ghost town, wouldnt bother if i was you.

Most people , if they are not quitting, are switching away from the server to NA or PC.

Calling PlayStation EU a ghost town is a bit harse. There are still lots of guilds with lots of members. And in most zones, I always come across other players. It may not be the same levels as on PC-EU, but it is still not "a ghost town" as you call it.

Uh, my ArcTank needs it soooo…

I'll be a PvP main and will be forever...unless vengeance becomes the only mode, then it'll be time to find a new game.

Narvuntien wrote: »

[snip]

Bro what lol

The high elves have literally always been this way. [snip]

[edited for inappropriate content & to remove quote]

Yep, I also am wondering what they changed on June 25th. This is the first update that has ever tanked FPS as far as I can recall, and lag is worse everywhere now, especially after using a wayshrine or in Cyrodiil.

ZOS did something. They know what it is, and they aren't reverting it so the hit to performance remains still.

What ZOS needs to do is introduce Undaunted Basic Training to explain what a taunt is, the value of orbs, don't stand in red, etc..

How would the average player ever learn these things?

It could come in the form of instances. Maybe a series of four, starting with normal base game, normal dlc, vet normal and then vet dlc.

It would have to be WAY better than that brutally bad, nearly irrelevant tutorial they added to the intro quest.

They should need to pass basic tests to become accredited in each role before they can queue into vet dlc dungeons with them.

sarahthes wrote: »

Elsonso wrote: »

DreamyLu wrote: »

In the end, for me, this thread is a good reminder that often, the outcome of a ban wave is that a part of the banned players have done something against game policy. In that case, it was the use of an addon that automates gameplay. So yes, there were some false bans, but they are by now getting corrected.

It shows once more that ban wave rarely happens for nothing.

I think two things. First, false suspensions and bans should never happen. Second, ban waves rarely happen. Period.

I do not think this is possible without AI. I think AI would lower the false positive rate significantly.

After thinking on this for a while... it could amplify it. At our current state of consumable technology, AI is just a tool. The AI will just flag what it has been trained to flag.

I think that the reason that bans and suspensions happen, and get reversed, is that the criteria that is used to detect the infraction is larger than it should be. AI isn't going to narrow that down. If anything, my concern is that it would be able to find more players that fit into the criteria and create more false suspensions and bans.

As implemented by the popular AI companies, AI is neither artificial nor intelligent. The term is opposite of what it actually is.