Been watching this thread going around in circles now, with an increasing lack of civility. Let's recap and get on the same page:

- Literally no one would be against adding a robust permissions-based system to guild banks. As @wolfie1.0. point out, some of us have been asking for this for a decade.

We do not have that system...yet. As GM's, we have these 3 options:

- Close the guild bank entirely and use it for auction/raffle/whatever storage.

- Have a "by request" system while locking the bank to all members

- Open the bank to whoever you want, but *know that anyone at any time can wipe the bank* and you need to live with it. Or put in a ticket and see if ZOS chooses to act.

There are permissions in place, right now, that allow you to lock the bank to any rank. Hopefully a WAY better system is coming, as ZOS has hinted at but that is what we have today.

If any of us wanna "roll the dice" by opening our banks, knowing the risk, that's on us.

@ZOS_GregoryV @ZOS_Erin can we get some moderation help here?

This thread was recently closed due to @Haki_7 and @Moonspawn derailing any meaningful conversation regarding BGs. They're likely the same person using 2 accounts to bump their pet topic and choke out any other BGs discussion in General, as they have done before.

A big improvement when compared to the constant back and fourth changes from before.

However, it does seems like it's winding down. They are adding things to the game that aren't too much work, but keep us busy and can be marketed as features. Some of these features would be on the level of a hotfix in most other games. I just get the feeling that there are like 5 people working on this game instead of a whole studio.

• Night Market, Gold Coast Bazaar, Tomes feel like busy work
• Dk changes are rushed and unfinished
• Story and zone content heavily reduced
• Repetative in-game events

3 teams were better. Even if our teams gear is bad we could win via tactics. 2 sided games have all been clearly dominated to the point one team just goes afk or runs in circles.

The way I look at it is that we can now choose which "daily" rewards to claim, so for me it's progress. But I guess there are fewer of them now without purchasing the premium unlock.

So get rid of anything that still resembles ESO. I don't know why people play ESO when they dislike what makes ESO ESO.

Earlier today there was an update on reddit from Gina:


Also a few hours ago a guildie of mine got a response saying they were being escalated to a specialist team about their issue, not a denial so hopefully that means you can either continue to reply to your ticket or open a new one with this information.

Emeratis wrote: »

As I said in my original post though, I personally feel the writing has gotten better in some ways in the current writing era and worse in others. I appreciate we're getting more loremaster's archives again and that things feel more varied story wise, but I wish moral dilemmas in questing were more "what does your character value" and less "good/bad" or "right/wrong" answers like some earlier eras of eso were and some of the pop culture references and nods and memes would be toned down a bit. I do like that recently we've had a lot of oblivion lore get some love and fleshing out moreso than just "daedric prince of the month" and we are also getting some cool worldbuilding in general. Like I said I personally feel the current writing era is a mixed bag.

Can you give a few examples of recent lore additions that you enjoyed a lot? I mostly see the same negative aspects that you mention; the positive ones - sadly not so much.

For me personally, in terms of writing, I found the past few years more negative than mixed. There are a few quests I did enjoy (Zerith-var's questline was wonderful, and on Solstice I also enjoyed Corelanya Manor a lot), but I also strongly notice this moral writing, and all those quips, and meme-y things, and I don't enjoy that at all. And then, in the Solstice main story, many aspects that were entertaining at least, were basically just repetitions of the base game main quest or other story elements we've seen before, which is also a bit meh.

But I'm genuinely curious what other people liked. Perhaps there's aspects I've focused too little on (or interpreted differently).

Way I see it is they just need to scrap the earn 20000 tome points requirement to unlock all the pages, they already have the divide between the free and premium items and the cost of the items themselves let people spend the points they earn on what they actually want without having to unlock the specific pages to be able to select those items.