The Luxury Furnisher Vendor (Zanil Theran) is located north of the bank in the Hollow City, Coldharbour and the Belkarth Festival Grounds in Craglorn.

What does the Luxury Furnisher offer this week?

Bloodmage Crystal, Oblong — 4,000 g
Glass Crystal, Opaque Cluster — 4,500 g
Blue Flame Brazier — 5,000 g
Amethyst Crystals, Bed — 10,000 g
Blue Crystal Spire — 12,000 g
Blue Crystal Spire, Large — 18,000 g
Geode, Citrine — 20,000 g
Geode, Green Garnet — 20,000 g
Glass Crystal, Opaque Pillar — 20,000 g
Soul Gem, Great — 20,000 g
Khajiit Path Marker, Lion — 75,000 g

New:
Amethyst Crystals, Bed

Bloodmage Crystal, Oblong
Price: 4,000 g
Category: Undercroft — Symbolic Decor



Glass Crystal, Opaque Cluster
Price: 4,500 g
Category: Conservatory — Crystals



Blue Flame Brazier
Price: 5,000 g
Category: Lighting — Braziers
Tags: Interactable, Light



Amethyst Crystals, Bed
Price: 10,000 g
Category: Conservatory — Crystals



Blue Crystal Spire
Price: 12,000 g
Category: Lighting — Enchanted Lights
Tags: Light



Blue Crystal Spire, Large
Price: 18,000 g
Category: Lighting — Enchanted Lights
Tags: Light



Geode, Citrine
Price: 20,000 g
Category: Conservatory — Crystals



Geode, Green Garnet
Price: 20,000 g
Category: Conservatory — Crystals



Glass Crystal, Opaque Pillar
Price: 20,000 g
Category: Conservatory — Crystals



Soul Gem, Great
Price: 20,000 g
Category: Undercroft — Soul Gems
Tags: Interactable, Light




Khajiit Path Marker, Lion
Price: 75,000 g
Category: Lighting — Enchanted Lights
Tags: Interactable, Light



All items:

Loved the stream content and format, especially Alec's explanation about refreshed abilities feeling slow. That kind of in-depth technical discussion is what I'd enjoy seeing in a dev stream; announcements already have plenty of their own spotlight. Even if I don't understand all of it, it's interesting to hear about the details of what goes into the game, and it's cool to listen to someone nerd out about what they're interested in.

spartaxoxo wrote: »

Turtle_Bot wrote: »

Excuse me? you want to talk about disrespectful when you are posting stuff such as this?

I didn't say there was a problem with others players feeling differently. I'm saying that I would personally feel zos has disrespected my time if the core character that I have played for about a decade were to be deleted from the game suddenly. A decade is a massive time investment from players. That's what I mean. People felt the same way about things like AWA and quit the game or scaled back how much they played. We all have the things that are core to our gameplay experience and my ability to play my sorc is one of mine.

But in that exact same post, you specifically stated:

I certainly don't think the game should be designed around people who so easily quit over loyal players that have played the game for 10-11 years.

So what you're saying by this statement here is that these players who had played the game for it's entire lifespan up until their characters got gutted by ZOS forcing pets onto Sorcerer as the main focus of the class part way through this games lifespan are somehow lesser than you, and should just be ignored, just because they aren't playing the class the same way you do.

If that's the case, then how about those of us loyal Sorcerers that have stuck with the game for it's entire lifespan (10-11 years), despite the constant repeated gutting of our characters just to appease the few who only enjoy 2-3 skills from a single line and the constant subliminal messaging (by some at ZOS and the community) that we should just give up our characters and move on if we don't like how our characters have been deleted?

Maybe it's time ZOS listened and designed the game around us. We have stuck with this game through much more than some players who would quit the game just because 2 skills (not even an entire line) got moved (not deleted, MOVED) to a global skill line, and that maybe these other players that ZOS has been designing the class around for the past 5+ years weren't that loyal to the game in the first place if moving 2 skills to a globally accessible skill line that focuses and buffs those 2 skills and more was all it would take for them to quit.

I would strongly advise against voice chat in eso for pc. Another game I play frequently often has this request and one of their devs eloquently explained why voice chat is a double edged sword in this short clip here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IRO4TvuTZfw

He is absolutely correct about voice chat causing an increase in harassment and other issues for some players. Given eso's moderation tools when I've dealt with text harassment or player griefing in the past I have zero trust that voice chat will be moderated to the level it needs to be to keep players safe. For some of us, using voice chat with strangers opens us up to a lot of cruelty and unnecessary rudeness or sexual harassment based on how we sound. A lot of people underestimate that. While ESO's community is better than most on these issues, they still exist.

While I used third party voice chats with some guilds and groups, I get to choose whether I do so or not or whether those groups are safe to do so with and I think people underestimate how important that is.. I worry that similar to the issue of free respecs anywhere in the PTS chat, people would try to require use of eso's in game voice chat features even if players do not feel safe and comfortable using them and that is a huge deterrent for me and others who have reason for concern.

If voice chat is on the table, all the pros and cons and risks and rewards have to be weighed and we have to be honest with eachother and not just assume perfect case scenario, because like I said I've had bad enough experiences with some players over text that I fear what voice chat would bring up.

Radiate77 wrote: »

Okay so they remove Subclassing from PvP, what do you propose happens?…

People who have been using Streak switch to Sorcerer and split your head open with the highest burst in the game moving at Mach 5.

People who have been using Incap switch to Nightblade and continue to do exactly what they have been, except they are invisible 90% of the time again.

People who use Shalks go back to building 40k health unkillable Polar Wind spamming Wardens.

Removing Subclassing from PvP would solve none of the problem Classes, because they were a problem before Subclassing. All that would accomplish, would be to reduce the visibility of Skill Lines from Necromancer, Templar, Arcanist, and Dragonknight in PvP.

But even if it goes as you say, that is an improvement.

You can get people to swap to Sorc for streak or NB for cloak and incap or Warden for permablock polar wind.

You don’t have everyone running all at once. People would need to choose.

IMO you have ruined PVP by implementing sublcassing. It's great and alot of fun in PVE

In PVP subclass abilities should be SUBPAR. Stuns should ONLY snare or have their cost increased by 30-50%.
Subclassing should NOT be META it should be a gapfiller for your build with TRADEOFFS.

A warrior of the light aka Templar (my main since BETA btw)Should NOT be as skilled assasin as a Nightblade

FOR THE LOVE OF TALOS Zenimax Online.... Do you play your own game or are you not just caring about it? This is so tiresome

Carcamongus wrote: »

What language is that? I know it's not German, as I studied it for a short while...

I don't know for sure, I just see people talking like that online sometimes. I guess it's goblin language.

RebornV3x wrote: »

The Sorcerer rework needs to make the sorc a full battlemage class or summoner class ZOS needs to choose one or the other in my opinion either remove the pets and give them to necro and make necromancer the summoner class or lean into it and give sorc more pets and synergy with pets.

I truly believe there are better options than an extreme dichotomy– chopping off an entire class identity is not okay. They don't need to "just choose one", they need to actually manage and develop their game to allow for both playstyles. They might have to brainstorm a bit and be willing to work outside of the box on a really small scale, but there have already been a multitude of options and suggestions in this thread alone that would allow for both styles to exist. To ignore this route and lean into only one style would be foolishly damaging, regardless of the fallback that multi/subclassing can partially reaccommodate. The whole reason they're doing this refresh is to not have to rely on multiclassing.